Grant and cooperative-agreement radar for LongTermCapabilities

Full report

On this page

Scope and answer

This scan uses the current official Grants.gov search ecosystem, specifically the public Simpler.Grants.gov opportunity listings that Grants.gov now directs users to for federal opportunity discovery. I treated those official listing pages as the source boundary for this radar, then filtered for opportunities where a technical prime, evaluator, specialist subcontractor, or modernization partner role is plausible.

The headline commercial answer is cautious: several current opportunities can fund a clearly bounded technical service, but a clean direct-award delivery margin is usually not available in this shortlist if LongTermCapabilities would be the direct HHS or NIH recipient. HHS rules say, except for SBIR/STTR, no HHS funds may be paid as profit to a recipient, even if it is a commercial organization. NIH separately states that, except for SBIR/STTR, no profit or fee will be provided to a for-profit organization under an NIH grant, whether as a recipient or as a consortium participant. The cleaner commercial path is therefore usually contractor to an eligible lead recipient, not direct recipient or consortium-style subawardee, because federal assistance recipients may still buy goods and services through procurement contracts, and contractor relationships are distinct from subawards.

As of July 24, 2026, the strongest live targets are the open RCORP-Technical Assistance competition for a nationally scoped technical-assistance operation and the open NIH cooperative-agreement data-center opportunities, especially INTERACT, CEED, and GREGoRi. The ACL opportunities are attractive for a nonprofit-led bid with LongTermCapabilities in a modernization or platform-support role, but they are not obvious direct-prime fits for a for-profit firm.

Current shortlist

Rural Communities Opioid Response Program-Technical Assistance — HRSA-26-038 Agency: Health Resources and Services Administration. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: July 27, 2026. Published funding: $10,000,000 total, one expected award, award maximum $10,000,000. Eligibility boundary: domestic public or private, nonprofit or for-profit entities; the listing is effectively unrestricted across businesses, governments, nonprofits, and education organizations. Possible role: direct technical prime for a national TA platform, training operation, data/reporting layer, community support workflows, or implementation support backbone; also viable as a specialist contractor to another eligible lead. Public value: tailored technical assistance to rural communities implementing behavioral-health, prevention, treatment, and recovery services addressing opioid and related substance-use concerns. Commercial fit: strong on bounded scope, but only conditional on economics. If LongTermCapabilities is the direct HHS awardee, profit is barred; the cleaner margin case is a contractor relationship under an eligible recipient. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether the intended work package would be treated as recipient operations, a consortium-style project role, or a procured contractor role; whether LongTermCapabilities has the national TA delivery footprint HRSA expects for a single-award hub.

Lifespan Respite National Technical Assistance and Resource Center — HHS-2026-ACL-AOA-LRLT-0056 Agency: Administration for Community Living. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: July 27, 2026. Published funding: $420,000 total, one expected award, award range $350,000 to $420,000, with cost sharing required. Eligibility boundary: awards may only be made to public or private nonprofit entities. Possible role: specialist subcontractor or modernization partner to an eligible nonprofit lead, especially for database modernization, web resource architecture, technical-assistance systems, or measurement/reporting support. Public value: maintaining a national respite database, providing training and technical assistance to state, community, and nonprofit respite programs, and improving public information and referral. Commercial fit: viable only as a nonprofit-led contractor path if LongTermCapabilities is a for-profit. This is not a natural direct-prime target for a commercial entity. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether the lead would structure technology and database work as procurement rather than programmatic subaward activity; how the cost-share burden would be met; whether the center wants a refresh of the data architecture or only incremental support.

ACL National Falls Prevention Resource Center — HHS-2026-ACL-AOA-FPSG-0005 Agency: Administration for Community Living. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: July 29, 2026. Published funding: $7,500,000 total, one expected award, published award range $750,000 to $2,500,000. Eligibility boundary: government entities, institutions of higher education, and specified nonprofits; for-profit firms are not listed as eligible direct applicants. Possible role: specialist subcontractor, evaluator-support partner, or modernization partner for data collection, metrics/reporting, technical-assistance workflows, portal tooling, and partner-engagement systems. Public value: expanding evidence-based falls prevention by serving as a national connector, providing tiered technical assistance, supporting data collection and reporting metrics, and strengthening sustainability across the network. Commercial fit: conditional and best pursued behind an eligible lead. The scope is very suitable for a bounded service package, but not as a straightforward commercial prime. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether the eventual lead wants a technology contractor or a substantive program subawardee; whether data/reporting modernization is central enough to budget explicitly in year one; whether accessibility and multilingual requirements will expand the technical scope.

Community Engagement Evaluation and Data Coordination Hub to Advance Data and Practice Transformation for Optimizing Oral Health for All — RFA-DE-27-001 Agency: National Institutes of Health. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: October 19, 2026. Published funding: $1,000,000 total, one expected award; no published award minimum or maximum beyond that total. Eligibility boundary: broad and explicitly includes for-profit organizations other than small businesses and small businesses, alongside governments, nonprofits, and higher education. Possible role: direct technical prime, evaluator, or data-methodology lead if LongTermCapabilities can credibly supply the required scientific and program leadership; alternatively, contractor to an academic or nonprofit prime. Public value: the CEED hub coordinates communications and consortium operations across three distinct functions: data planning and technical assistance for research methodology and analytics, community engagement evaluation, and infrastructure/operational support. Commercial fit: attractive on mission fit and role clarity, but only conditionally attractive commercially. A for-profit can apply directly, yet NIH does not allow profit or fee to a for-profit recipient or consortium participant outside SBIR/STTR, so a direct prime only works if cost recovery without fee is acceptable. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether LongTermCapabilities can credibly front the scientific leadership expected in an NIH cooperative agreement; whether the opportunity is best pursued as prime, contractor, or analytics specialist to a university lead; whether the unpublished min/max award bounds hide a tighter usable services budget than the $1.0M total suggests.

HEAL INITIATIVE: INTERACT Data Coordination and Integration Center — RFA-AR-27-002 Agency: National Institutes of Health. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: October 1, 2026. Published funding: $4,000,000 total, one expected award; no published award minimum or maximum. Eligibility boundary: broad and explicitly includes for-profit organizations other than small businesses and small businesses, alongside governments, nonprofits, and higher education. Possible role: direct technical prime for a data-coordination and web-accessible information system build-out, or contractor to a research-heavy lead if LongTermCapabilities is stronger on delivery than on academic standing. Public value: the center must coordinate and integrate complex pain-related data across the INTERACT consortium and establish a web-accessible information system for dissemination and re-use. Commercial fit: one of the best functional matches in the current radar, because the work package is naturally bounded around data integration and platform operations; however, direct-recipient fee/profit is still barred under NIH rules, so the economically cleaner structure is often contractor-to-prime rather than direct NIH awardee. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether LongTermCapabilities has, or can partner for, the expected NIH scientific leadership and governance; whether this will demand protected research labor beyond a normal platform-services model; whether security, curation, and long-term data-hosting costs can be cleanly separated into a contractor work package.

GREGoRi Data Coordination and Outreach Center — RFA-HG-27-011 Agency: National Institutes of Health. Status: Open cooperative agreement. Close date: October 30, 2026. Published funding: $2,000,000 total, one expected award, published award minimum $1,250,000. Eligibility boundary: broad and explicitly includes for-profit organizations other than small businesses and small businesses, along with governments, nonprofits, and higher education. Possible role: direct technical prime or lead technical partner for protocol, data, metadata, tools, and public-resource coordination; alternatively, delivery partner to a genomics-heavy academic lead. Public value: the center is the central coordination point for the GREGoRi rare-disease program and must make protocols, data, metadata, computational tools, and program resources available to the broader research community. Commercial fit: very good bounded-service shape, especially for data coordination, tools, outreach, and platform operations; still conditional commercially because NIH direct awards to for-profits do not include profit or fee outside SBIR/STTR. Source link: official listing. Open eligibility questions: whether LongTermCapabilities has enough genomics and rare-disease credibility for direct-prime review; whether outreach and resource dissemination activities are expected to be research-governed rather than procured services; whether the project would classify LongTermCapabilities as science-carrying subawardee versus contractor if paired with a university lead.

Cellular Senescence Network Data Coordination and Integration Center — RFA-RM-27-025 Agency: National Institutes of Health. Status: Forecasted cooperative agreement, not yet open. Estimated post date: August 1, 2026. Estimated application due date: October 1, 2026. Published funding: $3,500,000 total, one expected award; no published minimum or maximum. Eligibility boundary: broad and explicitly includes for-profit organizations other than small businesses and small businesses, along with governments, nonprofits, and higher education. Possible role: direct technical prime or data-infrastructure/orchestration partner once the NOFO is formally posted. Public value: consortium-wide standards, harmonization, release workflows, portal enhancement, and organizational/outreach support for the SenNet program. Commercial fit: useful watchlist, not yet an outreach target. The work is highly aligned to data-infrastructure modernization, but it remains forecast-only today and would still carry the same NIH no-fee economics for direct for-profit recipients. Source link: official forecast listing. Open eligibility questions: whether the final posted NOFO holds the current scope and dates; whether LongTermCapabilities wants to invest pre-positioning effort before the final text is issued; whether the work will emphasize scientific coordination enough to require an academic prime partner.

Commercial implications

Across this shortlist, the best answer to the commercial question is: yes, several opportunities can fund a clearly bounded service, but only some structures create an acceptable delivery margin. The bounded-service side is strongest where the listing itself centers on a national technical-assistance provider, a data coordination center, a portal/information system, or a dissemination/evaluation hub. RCORP-TA, CEED, INTERACT, and GREGoRi all fit that pattern especially well.

The margin side is where the constraint appears. For direct HHS recipients, profit is barred except in SBIR/STTR. For direct NIH awards, NIH says no profit or fee goes to a for-profit recipient or consortium participant except in SBIR/STTR. That means LongTermCapabilities should treat direct-prime applications under these HHS/NIH assistance mechanisms as cost-recovery businesses, not fee-bearing contracts. If the firm needs a clear commercial margin above allowable direct and indirect cost recovery, the most defendable route is usually to be procured as a contractor by an eligible prime, because contractors are in a procurement relationship rather than a federal-assistance subaward relationship.

That distinction matters operationally. If LongTermCapabilities provides standardized goods or services within its normal business operations, a contractor classification is easier to defend. If instead it is carrying part of the federal program itself, shaping programmatic objectives, or functioning like a consortium research partner, the lead recipient may have to classify it as a subrecipient or equivalent assistance partner, which is much less attractive for margin protection and often operationally heavier. This is especially important on the NIH center-style opportunities in this radar.

The practical readout is therefore straightforward. Best direct-prime targets if a no-fee model is acceptable: RCORP-TA, CEED, INTERACT, GREGoRi. Best contractor-to-lead targets if margin is required: Lifespan Respite, Falls Prevention Resource Center, and likely the NIH centers when paired with a university or nonprofit prime. Watchlist only: SenNet, because it is still forecasted rather than open.

Exclusions and non-opportunity signals

I excluded one common false positive from this radar: DE-FOA-0003166, “Challenges and Opportunities at the Interface of Wind Energy and Radar Technology.” It is an RFI/policy signal, not a fundable grant or cooperative agreement opportunity. The Grants.gov record shows a January 12, 2024 close date and $0 program funding, and the Federal Register notice identified it as a request for information to solicit public comment. It is relevant only as a market signal, not as deployable funding.

I also did not treat recently closed HRSA implementation-provider competitions as actionable current opportunities, even though they are strategically relevant benchmarks. For example, Nutrition Security for People with HIV: Implementation Technical Assistance Provider closed July 10, 2026, with one $2.5 million cooperative agreement and a scope that included selecting an intervention, creating demonstration sites, providing implementation TA, and supporting evaluation. That is valuable as a pattern for future recompetes, but not for immediate outreach today.

No local contracts are included here. The source boundary was federal Grants.gov opportunity listings for organizational assistance opportunities, not state, county, city, or institutional procurement portals.

Required human decision gate

This radar should remain a watchlist, not an outreach list, until a named human decision-maker is assigned on the LongTermCapabilities side. That named person needs to confirm, opportunity by opportunity, all of the following before anyone contacts an agency, a potential lead applicant, or a teaming partner:

LongTermCapabilities’ intended role must be named explicitly: direct recipient, consortium/subaward partner, or contractor. That choice drives both eligibility and economics.

LongTermCapabilities’ entity posture must be confirmed: for-profit, nonprofit affiliate, university affiliate, or joint team. Several of the ACL and HRSA opportunities change meaning completely depending on that answer.

The economic model must be accepted in writing: cost-recovery only for direct HHS/NIH assistance awards unless the opportunity is an SBIR/STTR case, versus margin-bearing contractor work if the firm is procured by an eligible lead.

For the NIH center-style opportunities, a named human must confirm whether LongTermCapabilities truly wants to compete as a scientifically reviewed prime, or instead wants to sell a bounded delivery package to a university/nonprofit lead.

Without that named human decision, the commercially safest reading is: do not outreach yet.