Strategic Intelligence Radar: Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Ecosystem for Technical and Modernization Partnerships

Full report

On this page

The acquisition of federal grants and cooperative agreements requires a highly calibrated, systemic approach, particularly when evaluating opportunities for specialized commercial entities operating under the structural parameters of LongTermCapabilities. The transition from identifying a raw federal notice to confirming a viable commercial engagement hinges on rigorous qualification of the federal funding instrument. This intelligence radar provides an exhaustive evaluation of current federal funding opportunities, specifically curated to identify avenues where LongTermCapabilities can serve as a technical prime, specialist subcontractor, evaluator, or modernization partner. The core operational objective is the preservation of eligibility boundaries and submission constraints while definitively answering the fundamental commercial question: Can the confirmed role fund a clearly bounded service and acceptable delivery margin? To achieve this, the analysis categorizes federal postings, strictly distinguishing between active notices, awarded instruments, generalized grants, policy signals, and localized contracts. It exposes known unknowns, isolates deterministic costs, and establishes a rigid framework requiring named human confirmation prior to any market outreach. The evaluation of delivery margin viability is predicated on the regulatory environment governing federal financial assistance, specifically the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR 200), which fundamentally differs from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) utilized in traditional procurement contracts.

Commercial Delivery and Margin Viability Architecture

Before examining specific sectoral opportunities, the commercial viability of participating in federal grants and cooperative agreements must be established. The primary challenge for a commercial entity entering the financial assistance space is protecting delivery margins against scope creep and indirect cost limitations. To fund a clearly bounded service, the role of LongTermCapabilities must be structurally insulated from the generalized, often open-ended research or program objectives of the prime awardee. If eligible to prime, the entity must ensure that the proposed budget explicitly captures all direct labor, fringe benefits, and overhead, with delivery bounded strictly by the approved work plan. If partnering with an eligible non-profit or academic institution, the commercial entity must negotiate a subaward or, preferably, a vendor contract. A vendor contract, treated as a procurement action by the prime, allows for fixed-price deliverables, insulating the commercial entity from the prime's cost-reimbursement administrative burden. Under this structure, the service is bounded by a definitive Statement of Work (SOW) executed via a Teaming Agreement prior to submission. Acceptable delivery margins in the grant space are dictated by the treatment of indirect costs and allowable fees. Federal regulations permit the recovery of indirect costs through a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA). If the prime or subawardee does not possess a NICRA, they may elect to use a de minimis indirect cost rate. Recent federal adjustments, as evidenced by the Small Business Administration's Federal and State Technology (FAST) Partnership Program framework, allow entities to request reimbursement for indirect costs using the de minimis rate of 15% of Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.4141. Furthermore, margin protection requires distinguishing between a grant, which involves minimal federal involvement, and a cooperative agreement, which legally mandates substantial federal involvement2. Cooperative agreements carry a significantly higher risk of scope creep due to federal steering by agency personnel. Therefore, margins must be protected by rigorous change-order provisions in any sub-tier agreement. Finally, financial modeling must rely entirely on deterministic costs. For example, specific computational facilities provide hard costs, such as the NASA Center for Climate Simulation requiring a deterministic budget inclusion of $0.09 per Standard Billing Unit (SBU)3. Margin calculations must treat these deterministic pass-throughs as fixed baselines.

Sector I: Modernization of Federal Nutrition and Agricultural Infrastructure

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is currently undertaking a massive modernization effort aimed at bridging the gap between digital payment architectures and localized agricultural supply chains. This sector presents tier-one opportunities for modernization partners capable of developing secure, scalable software applications. The USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)—which is undergoing a nomenclature transition to the Food and Nutrition Administration (FNA)—has issued a critical cooperative agreement to modernize how Direct Marketing Farmers (DMFs) and Farmers Markets (FMs) process Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) transactions4. The systemic trend indicated by this opportunity is the federal government's strategic pivot away from specialized, single-purpose Point-of-Sale (POS) hardware toward secure, mobile, and eCommerce-based transaction applications that can be operated at little to no cost by the farmer4.

The eligibility boundary mandates that if LongTermCapabilities operates as a commercial or for-profit entity, it must approach this opportunity exclusively as a tier-one subcontractor or technology vendor to an eligible non-profit or university prime5. The financial scale is significant and deterministic: the USDA will award up to $4,000,000 total over a three-year period, spread across a maximum of three expected awards, meaning individual awards will average $1.33 million4. This provides sufficient funding depth to carve out a highly lucrative technology modernization subcontract. The commercial question regarding a clearly bounded service is definitively answered by the cooperative agreement's structural requirements. The notice specifically mandates the cooperator to provide or coordinate access to a "secure SNAP Mobile Transaction Processing Application" or a secure eCommerce platform capable of routing EBT transactions4. The design, deployment, security auditing, and maintenance of this software application represents a highly deterministic, cleanly bounded service. The non-profit prime awardee would assume the administrative burden of stakeholder facilitation, individual farmer outreach, and localized training4. Concurrently, LongTermCapabilities would execute the technology build under a fixed-price vendor contract. This bifurcation of duties perfectly protects the delivery margin, insulating the technology partner from the unpredictable, open-ended costs of community outreach and geographic travel. A named human decision-maker must evaluate the current network of non-profit agricultural advocacy groups to identify a viable prime partner and authorize the drafting of a restrictive Teaming Agreement prior to the July 31, 2026 deadline. In parallel with nutrition infrastructure, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has issued a notice for the Wetland Mitigation Banking Program (WMBP). This competitive grant program allocates $3,000,000 to support the development and establishment of mitigation banks solely for agricultural producers subject to the wetland conservation compliance provisions of the Food Security Act of 198511.

The deterministic costs associated with this grant indicate individual awards ranging from a floor of $100,000 to a ceiling of $1,000,00011. The margin viability for LongTermCapabilities within this opportunity rests on serving as a specialized geospatial evaluator. Establishing a mitigation bank requires rigorous topographic, hydrologic, and geospatial data coordination. By sub-contracting to a regional agricultural cooperative or state entity in one of the priority states (e.g., Illinois or Michigan), LongTermCapabilities can provide a bounded service consisting of geospatial mapping and compliance reporting. A named human must determine the geographic targeting strategy and authorize introductory discussions with state-level agricultural departments prior to the July 30 webinar. Furthermore, the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service operates the Market Access Program (MAP), which is currently open with an August 14, 2026 closing date and an estimated total program funding of $450,500,000 across 70 expected awards9. This staggering capital pool is restricted entirely to non-profit U.S. agricultural trade organizations, State Regional Trade Groups (SRTGs), U.S. agricultural cooperatives, and State agencies12. While LongTermCapabilities cannot prime, serving as a data evaluator for an SRTG to measure the efficacy of foreign market interventions provides a highly bounded analytics subcontract.

Sector II: Health Informatics, Clinical Data Coordination, and Occupational Safety

Federal science and health agencies are increasingly discarding decentralized, siloed research models in favor of "Hub and Spoke" network architectures for large consortiums. In this methodology, localized clinical or community research projects are funded separately, while a central, heavily capitalized "Hub" is funded specifically to provide data coordination, analytic standardization, and rigorous program evaluation. This structural shift represents an ideal insertion point for commercial entities specializing in data infrastructure and programmatic evaluation. The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has issued a Request for Applications (RFA) for the Community Engagement Evaluation and Data Coordination (CEED) Hub13. This centralized Hub will serve the broader Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) consortium, formally designated as Advancing Data and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) for Optimizing Oral Health for All14. The underlying systemic trend here is the NIH's recognition that localized community health research often yields fragmented, methodologically incompatible datasets. By funding a centralized evaluation hub, the NIH intends to enforce rigorous data harmonization, utilize advanced computational environments, and evaluate the precise efficacy of community engagement models14.

The funding mechanism utilized is a U01, which designates a Research Project Cooperative Agreement13. The NIH explicitly notes this is not a clinical trial grant, meaning the capital is deployed entirely for infrastructure, evaluation, and coordination rather than direct patient care13. The expected number of awards is exactly one, emphasizing the absolute centralization of this hub15. The evaluation of the commercial question—can the role fund a clearly bounded service and acceptable delivery margin—is highly favorable. The CEED Hub operates across three strictly defined, highly bounded domains: Data Planning, Consultation, and Technical Assistance for Research Methodology and Analytics; Community Engagement Evaluation; and ADAPT Consortium Infrastructure and Operational Support14. If LongTermCapabilities chooses to prime this U01, the delivery margin is protected by building dedicated administrative cores, data architect labor rates, and evaluation specialist hours directly into the U01 budget narrative, anchoring to the 15% de minimis indirect rate if a NICRA is unavailable. Alternatively, if acting as a subcontractor to a large academic institution, LongTermCapabilities can bound its service specifically to the first domain (Data Planning and Analytics). In this capacity, the firm would take responsibility for connecting the disparate consortium projects to the Science Collaborative for Health and Artificial Intelligence Reduction of Errors (SCHARE) cloud platform14. Because this is a cooperative agreement, NIH program staff will be substantially involved in the hub's operations. Therefore, the statement of work must explicitly bound the number of allowable data revisions or dashboard iterations to prevent margin erosion caused by continuous federal steering. A named human decision-maker must evaluate whether the entity currently holds the specific oral-health informatics credentials required to prime, or if an aggressive partnership strategy with an established dental school is mandatory prior to the September 2026 opening date. Beyond large centralized hubs, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) operates an extensive network of cooperative agreements and training grants focused on occupational safety. These opportunities signal a continuous federal commitment to translating raw occupational safety data into deployable workplace interventions, providing a highly reliable pipeline for digital modernization and training subcontracts.

The deterministic costs for the U54 Construction Safety Center range from an award floor of $3,000,000 to a ceiling of $5,750,000 for a single expected award19. The U01 Commercial Fishing Research agreements are scaled for 20 awards ranging from $150,000 to $975,00019. The U54 mechanism (Specialized Center) is highly complex, involving multiple interconnected research cores. A commercial entity can achieve a highly bounded service by sub-awarding a specific core, such as the Translation and Outreach Core. By treating the development of localized safety training software or digital dissemination platforms as a standalone deliverable, delivery margins can be tightly protected. If digital modernization of legacy training is required, software licensing, server costs, and deployment hours can be deterministically priced within the grant's equipment and contractual budget categories. Human review is required to evaluate the existing awardees of these U54 grants (the incumbent universities) to target outreach to the Principal Investigators well ahead of the December 2026 recompete deadline.

Sector III: Foundational Sciences, High-End Computing, and Defense Research

The federal science apparatus, spearheaded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), represents a massive, continuously rolling portfolio of grants and cooperative agreements. The NASA Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences (ROSES) program is the primary funding vehicle for fundamental space and earth science. A critical, systemic trend in recent NASA ROSES solicitations is the structural pivot toward continuous, overlapping submissions across calendar years and the rigorous integration of national security protocols into foundational research. For example, a strict policy signal indicates that any Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator spending more than 10% of their time on a proposed grant or cooperative agreement must undergo certified research security training starting August 5, 202620.

Securing a role within a NASA ROSES grant requires highly specialized scientific capability and strict adherence to the NASA GCAM. The delivery margin in fundamental science grants is notoriously difficult to protect if scoped purely as "basic research," which is inherently open-ended and unbounded by commercial definition. To ensure commercial viability, the role must be restricted to technology provisioning, software engineering, or specialized data analysis. NASA provides highly specific, deterministic cost structures that must be adhered to. Specifically, any proposal utilizing the NASA Center for Climate Simulation high-end computing facility must deterministically include $0.09 per Standard Billing Unit (SBU) in their budgets per ROSES-25 A.1 Earth Science Research Overview3. Margin calculations must treat these computational SBUs as rigid pass-throughs. The administrative mechanics of ROSES are highly complex. NASA utilizes a gated, two-step proposal process. Step-2 proposals can only be submitted if a Step-1 proposal was submitted and formally invited to proceed3. Several deadlines have been heavily amended or deferred to the end of the calendar year due to lapses in government funding and the transition from ROSES-25 to ROSES-263. A named human decision-maker must evaluate whether LongTermCapabilities currently holds the proprietary intellectual property or scientific standing to successfully pass a Step-1 peer review independently, or if immediately teaming with an academic Principal Investigator is the only viable path to market. In the defense domain, opportunities for evaluation and research coordination are present but often require rapid turnaround. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) issued an amendment for the FY-25 ONR STEM funding opportunity (N0001425SF006), highlighting a close date of June 30, 202623.

Similarly, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) maintains a continuously open announcement for science, technology, and other research and development (W912HZ26S0001), allowing pre-proposals to be submitted at any time24. The open-ended nature of this broad agency announcement (BAA) style grant implies that LongTermCapabilities can define its own bounded service by submitting a highly constrained pre-proposal focused strictly on a proprietary environmental or materials science evaluation methodology.

Sector IV: Infrastructure, Transportation, and Environmental Resilience

Federal funding for physical infrastructure and environmental management often pairs massive capital deployment with rigorous safety and compliance evaluation requirements. The Department of Transportation (DOT) utilizes the Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) program to fund early-stage, high-risk technical innovations that traditional procurement avenues cannot support. Specifically, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is seeking applications for the FY26 Rail Safety IDEA.

The Rail Safety IDEA program deterministically limits awards to a maximum of $500,00025. Because this is an exploratory analysis program, the deliverables are generally constrained to functional prototypes, proof-of-concept software, or detailed engineering reports. This represents a rare, highly lucrative prime opportunity for a commercial technology firm. The statement of work is naturally bounded by the exploratory limits of the prototype itself. The margin is achieved by utilizing existing proprietary technology held by LongTermCapabilities and adapting it to rail contexts, thereby keeping direct labor and R\&D costs exceptionally low relative to the $500,000 award ceiling. However, due to the imminent close date of July 27, 2026, a named human must immediately authorize bid/no-bid resource allocation to ensure compliance with the submission window. Concurrent with transportation safety, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is closing massive fiscal infrastructure programs on July 24, 2026\. This includes the Fiscal Year 2026 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP), with a staggering deterministic award ceiling of $1,064,000,000, and the Fiscal Year 2026 Intercity Passenger Rail Program, capped at $9,500,00027. While commercial firms cannot prime these massive state-directed block grants, tracking their awardees provides a roadmap for downstream security modernization subcontracts in Q4 2026\. Within the environmental resilience and land management domain, the Department of the Interior (DOI) manages an incredibly high volume of specialized cooperative agreements and grants. These present frequent, lower-ceiling opportunities for environmental data evaluation and partnership coordination.

The deterministic capital available in these DOI notices is generally lower, ranging from $15,000 to $850,00028. For example, the Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) primary announcement offers 10 expected awards ranging from $300,000 to $500,00028. For LongTermCapabilities, priming these smaller grants is administratively inefficient. The margin-protective strategy relies on serving as a rapid, flat-fee evaluator or geospatial data partner to the primary state or tribal entity. A named human must conduct a geographic analysis to determine which state departments (e.g., Illinois Department of Natural Resources) are most likely to require outsourced data modernization to fulfill the grant mandates.

Policy Signals, Archived Notices, and Pipeline Intelligence Architecture

A vital, sophisticated component of federal grant strategy is the ability to recognize when a published notice is no longer an active acquisition target, but rather a policy signal. Opportunities with passed deadlines, highly localized geographic constraints, or narrow consortium mandates serve to illuminate agency funding trajectories and dictate future partnering pipelines. These signals highlight where federal capital has been injected into state and local economies, precipitating a wave of localized contract solicitations in the subsequent fiscal quarters. 1\. USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (SCBGP): The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published an application deadline of June 8, 2026, allocating approximately $86.6 million for FY 202630. Because this deadline has passed relative to the current operational timeframe, it ceases to be a prime target and transitions into a policy signal. This funding operates as a block grant distributed strictly to State Departments of Agriculture, with deterministic allocations (e.g., Illinois receiving precisely $796,255.11 and Michigan receiving $2,640,404.94)30. The strategic implication is massive: this reveals the immediate downstream availability of local state contracts. States will issue localized Requests for Proposals (RFPs) using these federal funds to execute programs that enhance specialty crops. LongTermCapabilities must target state-level procurement portals in Q3/Q4 2026 for sub-tier agricultural modernization or evaluation contracts originating entirely from this block grant. 2\. SBA FAST Partnership Program: The Small Business Administration closed the SBA-OIIFT-26-001 opportunity on July 22, 20261. This cooperative agreement offered deterministic awards up to $180,000 to raise awareness of SBIR/STTR programs1. Crucially, the FAST program requires a severe non-federal match (50/75/100 depending on the state), of which 50 percent must be cash1. For a commercial entity like LongTermCapabilities, a heavy cash-match requirement destroys delivery margin viability unless the entity is heavily capitalized and intentionally using the grant as a loss-leader for market penetration. Therefore, this notice serves as a negative strategic indicator: avoid highly matched cooperative agreements for purely commercial margin generation. However, it confirms the universal applicability of the 15% de minimis indirect rate baseline under 2 CFR § 200.4141, which is highly useful structural intelligence for budgeting all subsequent federal submissions. 3\. Department of Education Comprehensive Centers: The Department of Education closed an opportunity (84.283B) on June 30, 2026, to fund a single National Center up to $6,750,000 per year for a project period of up to 60 months32. This enormous investment (exceeding $33,000,000 over five years) underscores the federal reliance on centralized technical assistance hubs, mirroring the NIH CEED Hub model14. While the deadline has passed, the winning entity—undoubtedly a massive national research institute—will be a prime target for continuous specialist subcontracting over the 5-year performance period. 4\. USDA Delta Health Care Services Grant (DHCS): This program closed on June 1, 2026, providing $6,000,000 to address unmet health needs in the Delta Region33. The deterministic parameters required applicants to legally form a Consortium, with one lead entity acting as the legal prime and recipient of the funds33. This highlights a rigid structural trend: agencies are increasingly forcing multi-entity consortiums to decentralize regional risk. To operate effectively in this specific ecosystem in the future, LongTermCapabilities must establish standing teaming agreements with eligible regional entities (such as local universities or Delta-region economic development boards) well before the FY 2027 NOFOs are published.

Operational Guardrails: Implementing the Human Decision Gate

The transition from strategic landscape analysis to active market capture requires the implementation of strict operational boundaries to prevent wasted bid and proposal (B\&P) expenditures. Autonomous or automated outreach to prime grant holders, academic principal investigators, or federal contracting officers is strictly prohibited within this framework. Every identified opportunity and policy signal must pass through a mandatory Human Decision Gate to ensure alignment with commercial margin requirements and eligibility realities. The Formalized Human Confirmation Protocol:

1. Commercial Viability and Margin Review: A named human strategic lead must manually review the deterministic costs and margin projections of any selected opportunity. This includes verifying that a 15% indirect de minimis rate1, when layered on top of direct labor costs and allowable fringes, yields an acceptable gross margin for the firm. If the mechanism is a cooperative agreement rather than a grant, the human lead must assess the margin risk associated with "substantial federal involvement" and potential scope alterations2.

2. Eligibility and Structure Verification: A named compliance officer must confirm that the firm's corporate structure strictly aligns with the opportunity boundaries. For example, explicitly acknowledging that the USDA SNAP Mobile Payments grant mandates a non-profit or IHE prime5, thereby restricting LongTermCapabilities exclusively to a subawardee or vendor role.

3. Statement of Work (SOW) Bounding: Prior to any introductory outreach to an academic or non-profit prime, a named capture manager must draft a highly restrictive, deliverable-based Statement of Work. This document must clearly bound the service. This vital step ensures that when LongTermCapabilities offers its technical or evaluation services to the prime, it does not inadvertently inherit the prime's open-ended research liabilities or broad geographic mandates, which are often fatal to commercial margin preservation.

The federal grant and cooperative agreement ecosystem presents highly lucrative avenues for entities capable of acting as technical primes, evaluators, and modernization partners. However, the commercial viability of these instruments is highly susceptible to margin erosion due to ambiguous scopes of work, mandatory matching funds, and restrictive indirect cost caps. By systematically targeting opportunities that allow for cleanly bounded services—such as the USDA SNAP Mobile Payments modernization4, the NIH NIDCR CEED Data Coordination Hub14, and highly specific CDC safety evaluation cores19—LongTermCapabilities can successfully navigate this ecosystem. The successful capture of these federal funds relies not on the sheer volume of applications submitted, but on the precise structural positioning of the entity, the exploitation of deterministic cost data, and absolute adherence to human-gated decision processes prior to market engagement.

Works cited

1. US Small Business Administration \- Office of Investment and Innovation FEDERAL AND STATE TECHNOLOGY (FAST) PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FY 2026 Funding Opportunity No. SBA-OIIFT-26-001 \- | SBIR, https://www.sbir.gov/sites/default/files/FAST\_FY26\_NOFO\_Cleared\_20260610.pdf

2. ONR Announcement N0001426SF0001 NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY (NOFO) Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Department of the Navy (DoN) Historic \- Grants.gov, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/c8965b4c-390b-4abc-8961-14bc48ba76a9/attachments/ac504eaa-02e4-402a-978a-7f69f9ff180f/N0001426SF001\_002.pdf

3. View Grant Opportunity \- Search Results Detail | Grants.gov, https://www.grants.gov/search-results-detail/360000

4. FY 2026 Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- Cooperative Agreement, https://atomgrants.com/grant/2026-mobile-payments-solution-snap-farmers-cooperative-agreement

5. FY 2026 Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- Cooperative Agreement, https://www.fna.usda.gov/grants/snap/mobile-payments-farmers-2026

6. Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- USDA Food and Nutrition Service, https://www.fna.usda.gov/grant/snap/mobile-payments-farmers-2024

7. FY 2026 Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- Cooperative Agreement, https://grantedai.com/grants/fy-2026-mobile-payments-solution-for-snap-authorized-farmers-cooperative-food-and-nutrition-service-4144f485

8. Opportunity Listing \- FY 2026 Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- Cooperative Agreement \- Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/14640845-21d8-4353-bd65-5adfca0c9e73

9. Search | Simpler.Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/search?utm\_source=Grants.gov\&status=posted\&fundingInstrument=grant%2Ccooperative\_agreement\&agency=\&topLevelAgency=USDA

10. FY 2026 Mobile Payments Solution for SNAP Authorized Farmers \- Cooperative Agreement, https://www.lightrfp.com/marketplace/bid/GRANTS-363096/fy-2026-mobile-payments-solution-for-snap-authorized-farmers-cooperative-agreeme

11. Opportunity Listing \- Wetland Mitigation Banking Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2026, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/676b4ce9-b544-4837-ae0f-75a8fd67512e

12. USDA-FAS-MAP-2027 \- Search Results Detail | Grants.gov, https://grants.gov/search-results-detail/362741

13. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) Pre-Application Informational Webinar for Community-Based Participatory Research Consortium Funding Opportunities: Advance Data and Practice Transformation \- NIH Grants and Funding, https://grants.nih.gov/news-events/calendar-of-events/6a172d577247b27b790ef992

14. RFA-DE-27-001: Community Engagement Evaluation and Data Coordination (CEED) Hub to Advance Data and Practice Transformation for Optimizing Oral Health for All (U01, Clinical Trial Not Allowed) \- Grants.gov, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/07b5ef08-35da-4934-94a6-389b5dd4e221/attachments/1ba1e177-e590-4312-bfae-cf835a2e1550/RFA-DE-27-001-Full-Announcement.html

15. Community Engagement Evaluation and Data Coordination (CEED) Hub to Advance Data and Practice Transformation for Optimizing Oral Health for All (U01, Clinical Trial Not Allowed) | RFA DE 27 001 \- Government Grants, https://www.arkansasgovernmentgrants.org/opportunity/community-engagement-evaluation-and-data-coordination-ceed-hub-to-advance-data-and-practice-transformation-for-optimizing-oral-health-for-all-u01-clinical-trial-not-allowed/98043

16. NOT-DE-26-014: Notice of NIDCR Pre-Application Webinar and FAQs for Community-Based Participatory Research Initiative (PAR-27-015 and RFA-DE-27-001) \- NIH Grants and Funding, https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-DE-26-014.html

17. Opportunity Listing \- Community Engagement Evaluation and Data Coordination (CEED) Hub to Advance Data and Practice Transformation for Optimizing Oral Health for All (U01, Clinical Trial Not Allowed) \- Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/07b5ef08-35da-4934-94a6-389b5dd4e221

18. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Community-Based Participatory Research Consortium Funding Opportunities: Advance DAta and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Initiative | NIDCR, https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/news-events/events/nidcr-preapplication-informational-webinar-community-based-participatory-research/faqs

19. Search | Simpler.Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/search?status=posted\&fundingInstrument=grant%2Ccooperative\_agreement\&agency=HHS-CDC-HHSCDCERA

20. Opportunity Listing \- ROSES 2025: A.4 Rapid Response and Novel Research in Earth Science \- Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/f412520b-5594-4ff2-ae51-9de1b8d8efef

21. Opportunity Listing \- ROSES25: A.15 Biosphere \- Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/c85c8500-e8a0-45d4-a887-cc759a4401af

22. View Grant Opportunity \- Search Results Detail | Grants.gov, https://www.grants.gov/search-results-detail/360913

23. ONR Announcement N0001425SF0006 Amendment 0002 \- Office of Naval Research, https://www.onr.navy.mil/assets/2026-01/N0001425SF006-Amendment-0002.pdf

24. Opportunity Listing \- ERDC Broad Agency Announcement \- Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/opportunity/98696099-8a71-4a7c-8e2d-1dfcf3817f75

25. Search | Simpler.Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/search?status=posted\&fundingInstrument=grant%2Ccooperative\_agreement\&topLevelAgency=DOT\&agency=

26. FY26 Rail Safety Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (Rail, https://www.highergov.com/grant-opportunity/fy26-rail-safety-innovations-deserving-exploratory-analysis-rail-safety-idea-363181/

27. Search | Simpler.Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/search

28. Search | Simpler.Grants.gov, https://simpler.grants.gov/search?agency=\&fundingInstrument=grant%2Ccooperative\_agreement\&status=posted\&topLevelAgency=DOI

29. F26AS00104 State ANS Management Plan 2026 \- Grants.gov, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/9aa9be7d-7f39-4546-ab9f-05aae6fac967/attachments/af275131-7ad3-4b78-a41a-6c47fb8dc589/Foa\_Content\_of\_F26AS00104.pdf

30. Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Fiscal Year 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity \- Agricultural Marketing Service, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/a7ffe6a2-1453-43ba-8b13-5a591db66f92/attachments/27737b6d-0f41-4bdf-a58d-d1ca3f075eeb/SCBGP\_NOFO\_FY26\_Final.pdf

31. Specialty Crop Block Grant Program Fiscal Year 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity \- Agricultural Marketing Service, https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP\_NOFO\_FY26\_Final.pdf

32. Comprehensive Centers Program \- Grants.gov, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/competitions/82f07837-ad3b-4c07-a9f7-be0445751e58/instructions/115e9f0b-bf0e-4ee1-8a1e-57a3d2de91ea/PKG00292744.pdf

33. Delta Health Care Services Grant Program, https://files.simpler.grants.gov/opportunities/5cf0efdb-ae8e-4ccd-96bf-705fb738f238/attachments/d1d750ce-b2bd-4e10-a4b6-d9afe0a3fd44/Delta\_Health\_FY\_26\_NOFO\_3.27.26.pdf