The Intersection of Neuro-Ophthalmology and WebGL: Engineering Effective and Safe 3D Hypnotic Visuals in Three.js

Full report

On this page

The Evolution of Hypnotic Induction and Ocular Fixation

The practice of hypnotic induction has undergone a profound evolution from its analog, interpersonal origins to contemporary digital applications driven by advanced generative computer graphics. Historically, visual fixation has served as a primary mechanical vector for inducing altered states of consciousness. The formalization of this concept began in the 1840s when the Scottish surgeon James Braid, widely considered the father of modern hypnotherapy, coined the terms "hypnotism" and "hypnosis"1. Braid's terminology, derived from "neuro-hypnology" or "nervous sleep," was explicitly designed to divorce the phenomenon from the prevailing, pseudoscientific theories of "animal magnetism" and mesmerism championed by figures like Charles Lafontaine1.

Braid discovered that requiring a subject to stare continuously at a fixed, often shiny object positioned slightly above the normal line of sight induced severe ocular fatigue and a paralysis of the eyelid muscles1. This sustained visual focus triggered a state he later termed "monoideism"—the intense concentration upon a single idea or stimulus1. The fatigue of the gaze, combined with the restriction of peripheral awareness, facilitated a transition from normal waking consciousness into a highly suggestible, relaxed state characterized by slowed breathing, muscle softness, and diminished critical analysis3.

In the modern digital era, the principles of ocular fixation and monoideism are frequently implemented through 3D web technologies. Three.js, a prominent JavaScript library built as an abstraction layer over the WebGL API, enables the creation of highly complex, real-time 3D animations directly within a browser5. These digital interfaces can serve as highly controlled, dynamic focal points for hypnotic induction. Among the most historically resonant and neurologically effective geometries utilized for this purpose is the logarithmic spiral. Unlike linear shapes, the logarithmic spiral possesses unique mathematical properties of self-similarity that echo throughout the natural world, making it an ideal continuous stimulus for deep visual tracking7.

Creating an effective 3D hypnotic spiral in Three.js requires a rigorous synthesis of cognitive neuroscience, complex mathematics, low-level graphics programming, and strict adherence to medical safety standards. The engineering of such a visual application must carefully modulate rotation speed, continuous motion, and color saturation via custom fragment shaders to directly influence human neural activity.

The Neurophysiological Basis of the Hypnotic State

To engineer a visual stimulus capable of reliably inducing a hypnotic response, it is crucial to understand the neurological basis of hypnosis itself. The academic study of the phenomenon has long been defined by the "state versus non-state" debate9.

The State vs. Non-State Debate

State theorists, drawing heavily on models such as Ernest Hilgard's Neodissociation theory, argue that hypnosis induces an altered state of consciousness that is qualitatively different from normal waking consciousness9. Hilgard posited that hypnotic phenomena are produced through a dissociation within high-level control systems, where the executive control system (ECS) is split into different streams by an "amnesic barrier"9. In this view, a specialized state—often referred to as a trance—facilitates profound reality distortions, increased suggestibility, and modifications in sensory processing that cannot be replicated in a standard waking state12.

Conversely, non-state theorists, aligned with the socio-cognitive or cognitive-behavioral approaches championed by researchers like Nicholas Spanos and Theodore Barber, argue that hypnotic responses are the product of normal psychological processes9. These theorists suggest that heightened expectation, deep relaxation, role compliance, and goal-directed fantasy can account for all hypnotic behaviors9. According to the non-state view, the phenomena attributed to hypnosis can be achieved without invoking a unique physiological trance, relying instead on the subject's motivation and attitudes12.

Recent advancements in neuroimaging, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and electroencephalography (EEG), have provided empirical evidence that bridges these two perspectives11. Neuroimaging demonstrates that while suggestions can indeed be acted upon in a normal waking state, standardized hypnotic inductions produce measurable, objective changes in brain activity13. These changes effectively alter the background dynamics of the brain to mediate the effects of subsequent suggestions, indicating a distinct physiological shift even if it does not neatly fit the historical definition of a mystical "trance"13.

Cortical Network Reconfiguration

Brain imaging studies reveal that hypnosis significantly alters functional connectivity between large-scale brain networks. Specifically, hypnotic states are associated with modulated activity in the Default Mode Network (DMN), the Salience Network (SN), and the Central Executive Network (CEN)13. Reduced functional integration within the frontoparietal executive control network during hypnosis correlates with the subjective experience of diminished agency and heightened automaticity13. For example, EEG source analysis of subjects processing visual oddball paradigms during hypnosis revealed reduced P3b event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes, indicating a disruption in the coupling within the frontoparietal network implicated in top-down cognitive control and stimulus categorization16.

Decreased activation in prefrontal regions suggests a reduction in goal-directed, critical analysis, which facilitates a state of profound suggestibility17. PET studies have shown that standard hypnotic inductions result in distinct activation patterns involving the brainstem, the thalamus, the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and the right inferior frontal gyrus17. Furthermore, when highly hypnotizable individuals are given suggestions to experience visual hallucinations, multivariate decoding analysis reveals greater top-down activation of sensory processing through lateralized neural mechanisms in the right hemisphere compared to standard mental imagery18.

The Hypnotically Induced Stare

Behaviorally, one of the most reliable markers of a highly hypnotizable individual entering a deep state is the "hypnotically induced stare" (HIS), historically referred to as the trance stare17. Empirical case studies demonstrate that this stare is not merely a social performance but involves objective, involuntary physiological changes17. These include massive alterations in the optokinetic reflex, pupillary reflexes, and the programming of saccades to single targets—changes that non-hypnotized control subjects cannot simulate voluntarily17. By utilizing a continuously moving 3D spiral, digital induction techniques attempt to capture the optokinetic reflex, driving the ocular fatigue originally observed by James Braid while simultaneously overriding normal saccadic exploration of the environment1.

Visual Entrainment and Neural Oscillations

Beyond ocular fatigue, continuous digital visual stimuli interact with the brain through a mechanism known as neural entrainment. The human brain operates via rhythmic fluctuations in the excitability of neuronal populations, manifesting as neural oscillations or brainwaves21. When exposed to rhythmic sensory stimulation—such as a flashing light or a rotating spiral with a specific spatial and temporal frequency—endogenous brain rhythms can synchronize their phase and frequency to match the external stimulus23. This phenomenon is objectively measurable via steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in the electroencephalogram (EEG)23.

To engineer an effective hypnotic visual, developers must target specific oscillatory frequencies that correlate with states of relaxation and heightened suggestibility.

 

Alpha Band Entrainment (8–13 Hz)

Alpha oscillations are the predominant neural oscillation in the posterior cortex and are fundamentally linked to the active inhibition of irrelevant sensory information28. Driving the brain at an individual's peak alpha frequency (Individual Alpha Frequency, or IAF) via visual entrainment induces a state of deep relaxation and heightens the brain's ability to filter out distracting environmental stimuli21. Visual stimuli oscillating at approximately 10 Hz effectively command the visual cortex to enter a relaxed, idling state, which is heavily associated with the early stages of hypnotic induction27. Studies utilizing the Eriksen flanker task demonstrate that visual entrainment at the alpha frequency selectively inhibits the perception of distractors, providing causal evidence for the role of alpha oscillations in attentional filtering32. Prolonged visual entrainment at the IAF can induce long-lasting modulations of resting-state alpha oscillations, increasing phase coherence well after the stimulus is removed21.

Theta Band Entrainment (4–8 Hz)

As a subject moves deeper into a hypnotic state, cortical activity often slows into the theta range27. Theta oscillations, which arise in structures such as the hippocampus and frontal cortex, are crucial for memory consolidation, associative binding, conflict monitoring, and accessing the subconscious22. Rhythmic visual stimulation at 4–6 Hz has been shown to successfully entrain theta rhythms, thereby facilitating periods of vivid, dreamlike imagery and heightened emotional receptivity characteristic of deep trance23. Experimental applications of visual theta burst stimulation (TBS) have confirmed robust theta-band EEG entrainment, mimicking the effects of more invasive procedures like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)33. Furthermore, theta entrainment strengthens theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling, which is responsible for ordering and integrating diverse sensory representations during complex cognitive tasks23.

In the design of a 3D Three.js spiral, the rotational speed and the spatial frequency of the spiral arms directly dictate the temporal frequency of the stimulus passing across the user's retina. By calibrating the visual pulse of the spiral's texture to cycle between 4 and 12 times per second, the developer can programmatically transition the user from an alpha-dominant state of relaxation into a theta-dominant state of hyper-suggestibility.

Perceptual Illusions: Motion Aftereffects and Time Dilation

A 3D spiral generates powerful optical illusions that further distort the user's perception of reality. State theorists argue that these profound sensory distortions bypass critical conscious faculties, deepening the trance12.

The Spiral Aftereffect

The spiral aftereffect is a specialized and potent form of the motion aftereffect (MAE), a robust visual illusion resulting from prolonged exposure to a continuously moving pattern36. When a subject stares at a spiral rotating inward (centripetal motion) for a continuous duration—typically 30 to 60 seconds—and subsequently shifts their gaze to a stationary surface, the stationary surface appears to dramatically expand outward36. Conversely, adapting to an expanding spiral results in a contracting aftereffect39.

This illusion is deeply rooted in the visual cortex36. Cortical cells tuned to the specific direction of the spiral's movement undergo selective adaptation and temporary fatigue36. When the physical stimulus ceases, the baseline firing rate of these adapted neurons remains suppressed relative to the neurons tuned to the opposite direction36. During competitive interactions between these detector outputs, false motion signals arise, causing the brain to perceive movement where none exists36. In the context of a digital induction, the MAE generates a profound sense of disorientation and perceptual detachment from physical reality.

Motion-Induced Duration Dilation

Visual motion also deeply impacts the perception of time, contributing to the "timelessness" often reported during altered states of consciousness10. Research indicates that a moving stimulus is perceived to last significantly longer than a stationary stimulus of identical physical duration, a phenomenon known as motion-induced duration dilation40. Experimental models utilizing Gabor patches and manipulating spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and the raw speed of visual objects demonstrate that speed is the primary determinant of this illusion40.

As the logarithmic speed of a visual stimulus increases, the apparent duration dilates proportionally, heavily engaging the higher-level motion processing stages in the brain's dorsal pathway40. Furthermore, human speed perception can be altered by cross-modal cues. The "beep-speed illusion" demonstrates that a visually presented moving object is perceived to be moving faster if its directional changes occur simultaneously with a short auditory burst41. By combining non-linear speed variations in a 3D spiral with synchronized auditory isochronic tones, developers can maximize perceptual distortion and duration dilation.

Mathematical Formulations for 3D Logarithmic Spirals

To realize these physiological and psychological effects in a digital environment, the geometry of the visual stimulus must be rigorously defined. While an Archimedean spiral possesses a constant distance between successive turns (defined by the polar equation [Figure omitted from source export]), a logarithmic spiral grows outward at a continuously accelerating rate42. Governed by the polar equation [Figure omitted from source export], this geometric progression naturally draws the eye toward the singularity at the center, facilitating the ocular fixation required for induction42.

In a 3D Cartesian coordinate system, the parametric equations for a logarithmic spiral mapped along a Z-axis depth vector can be expressed as:

[Figure omitted from source export]

[Figure omitted from source export]

[Figure omitted from source export]

Where:

• [Figure omitted from source export] is the parametric variable representing the angle (typically mapped from [Figure omitted from source export] to [Figure omitted from source export] multiplied by the desired number of revolutions)43.
• [Figure omitted from source export] defines the initial starting radius43.
• [Figure omitted from source export] controls the rate of exponential expansion43.
• [Figure omitted from source export] controls the linear displacement along the Z-axis, transforming a flat 2D spiral into a 3D conical or tubular structure43.

By adjusting the parameter [Figure omitted from source export], the visual density of the spiral near the center can be modulated. This creates higher spatial frequencies in the center of the visual field, which in turn influences the rate of optical flicker as the object rotates, directly impacting the SSVEP response40.

Three.js Implementation Strategies for Spiral Geometry

Implementing a mathematically precise 3D logarithmic spiral in WebGL via Three.js requires navigating the library's geometry generation paradigms. There are two primary approaches for generating a hypnotic spiral: constructing a volumetric physical mesh using THREE.TubeGeometry, or utilizing a custom THREE.ShaderMaterial applied to a simple plane to compute the spiral on a per-pixel basis.

Constructing Volumetric Meshes via TubeGeometry

To generate a volumetric 3D spiral tube, the developer must first define the path of the tube by extending the base THREE.Curve class44. The base curve class requires the implementation of a getPoint(t, optionalTarget) method, which accepts a parameter [Figure omitted from source export] strictly normalized between [Figure omitted from source export] and [Figure omitted from source export]44.

The custom curve method maps the normalized [Figure omitted from source export] value to the required number of revolutions and applies the logarithmic parametric equations43. The [Figure omitted from source export] and [Figure omitted from source export] coordinates incorporate the exponential function, while the [Figure omitted from source export] coordinate applies linear depth mapping43. This custom curve instance is then passed into the tube constructor: new THREE.TubeGeometry(curve, tubularSegments, radius, radialSegments, closed)45. To maintain high visual fidelity and smooth curvatures, tubularSegments must be set sufficiently high, often requiring 256 or 512 segments47.

Modern Three.js architecture strictly utilizes THREE.BufferGeometry over the deprecated THREE.Geometry class48. BufferGeometry stores vertex positions, indices, normals, colors, and UV mappings in contiguous memory arrays (such as Float32Array), severely minimizing the data transfer bottleneck between the CPU and the GPU48. TubeGeometry inherently returns a BufferGeometry, ensuring optimal handling of the complex vertex data required for a smooth spiral44.

Texture Flow and Infinite Motion

A highly effective technique for generating hypnotic motion without physically rotating massive geometry arrays on the CPU is to translate the texture along the UV coordinates of the TubeGeometry47. Because the UV mapping of a TubeGeometry perfectly follows the mathematical curve, offsetting the texture mapping linearly inside the render loop (material.map.offset.x \-= speed) creates the illusion of infinite inward or outward motion47. This technique engages the motion aftereffect without the computational overhead of recalculating vertex positions every frame, maintaining the smooth flow required for entrainment47.

Advanced GLSL Shaders: Implementing Optional and Selective Colors

While static textures mapped to a TubeGeometry are effective, the most powerful, flexible, and visually striking hypnotic visuals are generated entirely on the GPU using custom shaders. WebGL relies on the OpenGL Shading Language (GLSL), a C-like typed language that allows developers to manipulate vertices and pixels directly on the graphics card6.

In Three.js, custom GLSL is implemented via THREE.ShaderMaterial or THREE.RawShaderMaterial6. ShaderMaterial provides the developer with built-in uniforms and attributes (such as projection matrices and camera positions) while allowing complete control over the final pixel output via the fragment shader49.

Fragment Shader Log-Polar Mapping

Rather than computing thousands of vertices for a 3D tube on the CPU, a perfectly smooth 2D or pseudo-3D spiral can be calculated on a per-pixel basis within the fragment shader using a log-polar coordinate transformation53. The fragment shader takes the standard Cartesian UV coordinates provided by a simple plane geometry and converts them into polar coordinates—specifically, a radius and an angle53.

In GLSL, this is achieved by normalizing the coordinates to the center of the screen, determining the radius using the length() function, and determining the angle using the atan() function53. To create the logarithmic spiral effect, the natural logarithm of the radius is combined with the angle and a time uniform. By wrapping this calculation in a fractional function (fract()), the shader creates an infinitely repeating spiral pattern that zooms inward or outward based on the progression of time53.

Designing Selective and Dynamic Color Uniforms

A core requirement for advanced clinical or recreational hypnotic visuals is the ability to provide optional and selective colors. Different individuals respond better to different color temperatures, and specific palettes must be avoided for safety reasons. The mathematical precision of the fragment shader allows for flawless implementations of selective coloring without requiring texture swaps.

To make colors dynamically changeable without recompiling the GLSL code, data is passed from the JavaScript CPU environment to the GPU shader via uniforms5. A uniform acts as a bridge, allowing real-time variables to dictate shader behavior57.

A standard implementation in Three.js passes multiple THREE.Color vectors and a control state to the shader5:

 

 

 

JavaScript

const uniforms \= {     uTime: { value: 0.0 },     uColorPrimary: { value: new THREE.Color(0x00ffcc) },     uColorSecondary: { value: new THREE.Color(0x003399) },     uColorMode: { value: 1.0 } // 0.0 for grayscale, 1.0 for bichromatic, 2.0 for custom };

Within the fragment shader, gl\_FragColor is responsible for setting the final RGBA output of each pixel6. To map selective colors to the procedurally generated spiral bands, the shader utilizes the mix() function. This function interpolates between uColorPrimary and uColorSecondary based on the floating-point value of the spiral calculation5. Furthermore, smoothstep() functions can be applied to the spiral output to create sharp, hard-edged bands of color or ultra-smooth, hypnotic gradients57.

If the user desires a monochrome experience, the uColorMode uniform can act as a logic gate. When set to grayscale, the shader strips the color saturation calculations and maps the spiral output strictly to a varying luminance channel, multiplying the base white vector by the spiral float. This level of programmatic control is vital for mitigating sensory overload and tailoring the induction to the user's specific neurological profile.

Performance Optimization for Sustained Entrainment

The efficacy of neurophysiological entrainment relies entirely on the temporal stability of the visual stimulus. If the goal is to entrain the brain's alpha rhythm at precisely 10 Hz, the application must run at a flawless 60 frames per second (fps), which represents a strict rendering budget of 16.67 milliseconds per frame58. Frame drops, micro-stutters, or GPU-induced jank will immediately disrupt the rhythmic sensory stimulation, breaking the SSVEP synchronization and pulling the user out of the trance state24.

While Three.js is highly optimized, complex procedural geometry and unoptimized textures can quickly exhaust GPU resources, particularly on mobile devices59.

Minimizing Draw Calls via Instancing

The primary enemy of WebGL performance is the draw call—the command sent from the CPU to the GPU instructing it to render a specific mesh with a specific material59. Rendering hundreds of individual 3D spiral segments as separate meshes forces the CPU to issue hundreds of draw calls per frame, leading to severe thermal throttling59.

If the visual requires multiple spirals or complex overlapping geometric structures, the architecture must utilize THREE.InstancedMesh59. Instancing allows the renderer to draw thousands of copies of a single BufferGeometry in a single draw call59. The CPU provides an array of transformation matrices (position, rotation, scale) for each instance, and the GPU handles the placement natively59. For moving instances along a curve, modern Three.js extensions such as InstancedFlow allow developers to perfectly animate hundreds of objects along a defined spline with virtually zero CPU overhead, allowing complex galaxy-like spiral formations to render at a strict 60fps61.

Texture Compression and VRAM Management

If the spiral relies on image textures rather than purely mathematical fragment shaders, standard web image formats (PNG, JPEG) present a severe bottleneck. While a JPEG may have a small file size over the network, the browser must decompress the image into raw bitmap data before uploading it to the GPU's Video RAM (VRAM)59. A standard high-resolution PNG can easily consume 50MB to 100MB of VRAM, leading to catastrophic garbage collection pauses and out-of-memory crashes on mobile GPUs59.

To maintain the 60fps budget, developers must implement GPU-compressed texture formats, such as KTX2 utilizing the Basis Universal standard59. These formats remain mathematically compressed directly within the VRAM and are decoded natively by the GPU hardware during the rendering pipeline. This drastically reduces memory bandwidth consumption and ensures smooth, uninterrupted visual flow59.

Neurological Safety Protocols and WCAG Compliance

While engineering powerful visual inductions, developers must remain acutely aware of the neurological hazards associated with rhythmic visual stimulation. Photosensitive Epilepsy (PSE) affects approximately 1 in 4,000 individuals, triggering seizures in response to visual stimuli that form specific temporal or spatial patterns, such as flashing lights or bold regular movements62.

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) establishes clear, strict mandates within the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 to protect users from photosensitive triggers62. Failure to adhere to these guidelines transforms a therapeutic or experimental visual tool into a dangerous digital hazard.

Regulatory Thresholds for Photosensitivity

WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 2.3.1 (Three Flashes or Below Threshold, Level A) dictates that web pages must not contain any content that flashes more than three times within any one-second period, unless the flash remains below the general flash and red flash thresholds63. If a developer seeks the stricter Level AAA conformance (Success Criterion 2.3.2), the content must categorically not flash more than three times per second, regardless of contrast63.

The following table synthesizes the international safety standards and expert consensus for mitigating PSE hazards, drawing from ITU-R, ISO, and WCAG guidelines:

 

Designing Safe Hypnotic Spirals

To safely target the alpha (8–13 Hz) and theta (4–8 Hz) brainwave bands without triggering seizures, the visual stimuli must bypass the strict definition of a "flash" while still providing a rhythmic sensory drive. A general flash is defined as a pair of opposing changes in relative luminance—an increase followed by a decrease, or vice versa69.

If a Three.js spiral alternates rapidly between high-contrast black and white frames at 10 Hz to entrain alpha waves, it constitutes 10 flashes per second. This blatantly violates WCAG 2.1 SC 2.3.1 and risks immediate seizure generation in susceptible individuals65. Such content would fail automated analysis tools like the HardingFPA system, which detects high-contrast scene changes and inversions67.

To engineer a safe stimulus, developers must substitute harsh luminance flickering with smooth spatial translation. A continuous, smoothly rotating 3D logarithmic spiral does not "flash" on and off; rather, it presents continuous spatial motion across the retina. As long as the contrast ratio between the spiral bands remains low and the transitions between colors are handled by smooth gradient interpolation (utilizing the GLSL smoothstep() function rather than harsh step() cutoffs), the visual cortex still registers the temporal frequency of the passing bands. This enables neural entrainment without triggering the rapid paroxysmal depolarizing shifts associated with PSE.

Furthermore, regarding selective coloring, the use of saturated red must be explicitly avoided or severely limited. Transitions involving high-saturation red wavelengths cause significantly larger cortical excitation than blue-green transitions and dramatically lower the threshold for seizure induction67. When offering optional color palettes via shader uniforms, the default states should rely on low-contrast, cool-temperature palettes (such as deep blues, muted cyans, or grayscales), completely isolating red channels unless explicitly and safely controlled by the user.

Conclusion

The construction of effective 3D hypnotic visual techniques utilizing Three.js represents a highly sophisticated convergence of neurophysiology, mathematical geometry, and advanced GPU programming. By understanding the historical precedent of ocular fatigue and integrating it with modern neurobiological mechanisms of alpha and theta entrainment, developers can manipulate spatial frequencies and animation speeds to profound effect. These techniques directly modulate the user's perception of time and agency through the spiral motion aftereffect and duration dilation. The implementation of true logarithmic spirals, achieved through customized BufferGeometry tubes or highly optimized log-polar fragment shaders, allows for seamless infinite scaling. Furthermore, leveraging GLSL uniforms grants exact programmatic control over selective and optional color palettes, allowing for dynamic customization. Crucially, the pursuit of maximum visual efficacy must be balanced by an uncompromising commitment to hardware performance at 60 frames per second and rigorous adherence to WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards, ensuring that the alteration of consciousness remains both a safe and deeply engaging digital experience.

Works cited

1. Braid, James (1795–1860) \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319375966\_Braid\_James\_1795-1860

2. Orne & Hammer 1974 Encyl. Brit \- School of Arts & Sciences, https://www.sas.upenn.edu/psych/history/orne/ornehammer1974encybrit133140.html

3. History of hypnosis \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History\_of\_hypnosis

4. The Eye Fixation Method Explained, https://discoveringhypnosis.com/the-eye-fixation-method-explained

5. Creating a custom shader in Three.js \- DEV Community, https://dev.to/maniflames/creating-a-custom-shader-in-threejs-3bhi

6. Writing a WebGL Shader, https://www.ownkng.dev/thoughts/writing-a-webgl-program

7. To Life\!: Eco Art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet 9780520954236, https://dokumen.pub/to-life-eco-art-in-pursuit-of-a-sustainable-planet-9780520954236.html

8. Secrets in The Fields \- Freddy Silva | PDF \- Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/825107926/OceanofPDF-com-Secrets-in-the-Fields-Freddy-Silva

9. Hypnosis State vs. Non-State Flashcards in Meida ... \- Brainscape, https://www.brainscape.com/flashcards/hypnosis-state-vs-non-state-5194400/packs/7666645

10. States of consciousness: The state \- nonstate debate in hypnosis, https://hypnosisandsuggestion.com/states-of-consciousness.html

11. opinion paper \- LJMU Research Online, https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28590/1/State\_or\_Non-State\_accepted\_manuscript\_130526.pdf

12. The Big Hypnosis Debate \- State or Nonstate? \- Adam Eason, https://adam-eason.com/the-big-hypnosis-debate-state-or-nonstate/

13. Hypnosis and neuroscience: Implications for the altered state debate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286784731\_Hypnosis\_and\_neuroscience\_Implications\_for\_the\_altered\_state\_debate

14. Segregated brain state during hypnosis \- Oxford Academic, https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2021/1/niab002/6166137

15. empirical resolution of the altered state debate | bscah, https://bscah.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/EMPIRICAL-RESOLUTION-OF-THE-ALTERED-STATE-DEBATE-221-part-5.pdf

16. Suggested visual blockade during hypnosis: Top-down modulation, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8443036/

17. The Existence of a Hypnotic State Revealed by Eye Movements \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3200339/

18. Hypnotic visual hallucination induces greater lateralised brain, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34146711/

19. What is hypnosis and how might it work? \- PMC \- NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357291/

20. Hypnosis And Neuroscience: Understanding The Powerful Link, https://hypnosistrainingacademy.com/hypnosis-and-neuroscience/

21. Prolonged Visual Entrainment Induces Long-Lasting Alpha-Band, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42144890/

22. The rhythm of memory. Does theta frequency audio/visual flicker, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1555081/full

23. Assessing Rhythmic Visual Entrainment and Reinstatement of Brain, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7378394/

24. Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3142861/

25. Visually Entrained Theta Oscillations Increase for Unexpected, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6843601/

26. Measuring contrast processing in the visual system using the steady, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40318606/

27. 43 Alpha, Theta, Delta Brainwave Entrainment Benefits \- EOC Institute, https://eocinstitute.org/meditation/brainwave\_charts\_brainwave\_patterns/

28. Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3507158/

29. eeg alpha oscillations represent a pulsed inhibition of ongoing cortical, https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/26498/bitstreams/90660/data.pdf

30. Alpha-tACS Improves Executive Function and Alpha... : CNS, https://journals.lww.com/01445395-202606000-00020

31. The spatial localization of targeted alpha modulations in concurrent, https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30659/8/Jaeger\_Cilia.pdf

32. Rhythmic visual stimulation enhances visual search via occipito, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13125035/

33. Theta burst entrainment of human EEG using flickering light, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41026883/

34. The role of alpha oscillations in visual processing \- Enlighten Theses, https://theses.gla.ac.uk/82644/1/2021coldeaphd.pdf

35. Brief personalized rhythmic auditory stimulation facilitates cognitive, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/293/2063/20251857/479608/Brief-personalized-rhythmic-auditory-stimulation

36. The motion aftereffect \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21227087/

37. The motion aftereffect reloaded \- PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18951829/

38. Motion Aftereffect and Perceptual Design in Video Games Involving, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42368816\_She's\_a\_Waterfall\_Motion\_Aftereffect\_and\_Perceptual\_Design\_in\_Video\_Games\_Involving\_Virtual\_Musicianship

39. ‍Optical Illusions ‍ ❇️ ✳️ \- SoundEagle ೋღஜஇ, https://soundeagle.wordpress.com/2017/09/28/optical-illusions/

40. Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed | JOV, https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2122203

41. Not proportional after all: Investigating speed perception with ... \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12795862/

42. Equation of a 3D curve shaped like a logarithmic spiral, https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1599238/equation-of-a-3d-curve-shaped-like-a-logarithmic-spiral

43. Connecting two points with a 3D logarithmic spiral (Julia), https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73072738/connecting-two-points-with-a-3d-logarithmic-spiral-julia

44. The Curve class in threejs a general overview \- Dustin Pfister, https://dustinpfister.github.io/2022/06/17/threejs-curve/

45. TubeGeometry – three.js docs, https://threejs.org/docs/pages/TubeGeometry.html

46. Threejs TubeGeometry: Applying custom curve causes unexpected, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31660099/threejs-tubegeometry-applying-custom-curve-causes-unexpected-twisting

47. Infinite Tubes with Three.js \- Codrops, https://tympanus.net/codrops/2017/05/09/infinite-tubes-with-three-js/

48. BufferGeometry – three.js docs, https://threejs.org/docs/pages/BufferGeometry.html

49. Writing GLSL with three.js — Part 1 | by Dusan Bosnjak \- Medium, https://medium.com/@pailhead011/writing-glsl-with-three-js-part-1-1acb1de77e5c

50. Improve Performance on Three.js Scenes Using Custom Meshes, https://57blocks.com/blog/improve-performance-on-threejs-scenes-using-custom-meshes-and-buffergeometry

51. Material Vertex Color and the buffer geometry attribute used for, https://dustinpfister.github.io/2023/01/20/threejs-buffer-geometry-attributes-color/

52. ShaderMaterial – three.js docs, https://threejs.org/docs/pages/ShaderMaterial.html

53. A tutorial on logarithmic spirals : r/GraphicsProgramming \- Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/GraphicsProgramming/comments/1p3vlw3/a\_tutorial\_on\_logarithmic\_spirals/

54. Log-spherical Mapping in SDF Raymarching \- osar.fr, https://www.osar.fr/notes/logspherical/

55. GLSL for Builders: A Shader Lab You Can Actually Use, https://blakecrosley.com/blog/glsl-shader-lab

56. notes/content/logspherical/logpolar\_polka.glsl at master \- GitHub, https://github.com/pac-dev/notes/blob/master/content/logspherical/logpolar\_polka.glsl

57. The Study of Shaders with React Three Fiber \- Maxime Heckel's Blog, https://blog.maximeheckel.com/posts/the-study-of-shaders-with-react-three-fiber/

58. Three.js Performance Optimisation: 60fps Patterns | IGC, https://www.intelligentgraphicandcode.com/development/threejs-interfaces/performance

59. WebGL at 60fps: Optimizing Three.js for Production \- Vedansh Danot, https://www.vedanshh.dev/blog/optimizing-threejs-webgl-performance

60. Three.js Performance Optimization: 60fps on Any Device | XR, https://tobias-weiss.org/content/xr/threejs-performance-optimization/

61. Curve Modifiers in Three.js \- Medium, https://medium.com/samsung-internet-dev/curve-modifiers-in-three-js-1ada72c61677

62. Photosensitive epilepsy \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosensitive\_epilepsy

63. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 \- W3C, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

64. Animations and Visual Effects \- University of Illinois, https://publish.illinois.edu/accessibility-training/2017/08/09/animations-and-visual-effects/

65. Blinking or Scrolling Content: Just Don't Do It\! Accessibility Guide, https://equalizedigital.com/accessibility-checker/blinking-or-scrolling-content/

66. Strobe Light for Stage: Beginner FAQ — Flash Rate, Safety & DMX, https://www.meanreal.com/guides/strobe-light-for-stage-beginner-faq.html

67. International Guidelines for Photosensitive Epilepsy: Gap Analysis, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872230/

68. Myths about Epilepsy and Digital Accessibility, https://www.boia.org/blog/myths-about-epilepsy-and-digital-accessibility

69. Web accessibility for seizures and physical reactions \- MDN Web Docs, https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/Guides/Seizure\_disorders