The Ones Who Choose to Remain: The Psychology, Sociology, and Ethics of Voluntary Left-Behind Populations

Full report

On this page

Introduction: The Speculative Ethics of Refusal

In the event of a global catastrophe culminating in an apparent mass ascension or planetary evacuation—a phenomenon promising escape, transcendence, or salvation from a critically damaged Earth—the conventional assumption is that all rational actors would willingly depart. However, this assumption overlooks the profound complexities of human sociological anchoring, the ethics of care, and the deep psychological bonds connecting individuals to physical and social environments. Investigating the population that voluntarily chooses to remain behind requires a multidisciplinary framework, drawing upon environmental psychology, the sociology of disaster subcultures, trauma theory, and comparative ethics. The baseline parameters of this speculative scenario dictate that the removal process may be fraught with unknown dangers, deception, or absolute irreversibility, while the act of remaining serves a custodial function. Those who stay behind act to preserve the biosphere and sustain a continuous machine-organic symbiotic project. It is imperative to explicitly state that this analysis does not advocate, endorse, or encourage the rejection of real-world emergency evacuation orders during acute natural or anthropogenic disasters1. Real-world emergency management relies heavily on the swift withdrawal of populations to minimize loss of life, reduce the burden on first responders, and facilitate effective recovery1. Rather, the scenario analyzed herein serves as a philosophical testing ground and worldbuilding exercise to explore the moral gravity of stewardship, the ethics of non-abandonment, and the psychological endurance required to inhabit a post-departure world. By mapping the speculative choice to remain against historical precedents—such as wartime archivists, monastic custodians, covert military stay-behind units, lighthouse keepers, and disaster workers—a highly nuanced understanding emerges. This exhaustive report systematically identifies the diverse motives for staying, compares these speculative actors to historical cohorts, distinguishes healthy stewardship from psychological pathology, constructs a qualitative typology of voluntary survivors, and outlines the inevitable breaking points of the survivor identity.

The Sociology of Evacuation Refusal: Grounding the Speculative in the Real

The foundation for understanding a speculative mass-refusal lies in the empirical study of disaster sociology. Historically, emergency managers and sociologists have grappled with the reality that a significant percentage of populations refuse to leave hazardous zones despite mandatory evacuation orders2. Evacuation behavior is rarely a simple calculation of physical risk; it is deeply mediated by social networks, geophysical vulnerabilities, and prior disaster experience2. Researchers such as E.L. Quarantelli and Russell Dynes have extensively documented the emergence of "disaster subcultures"—interrelated sets of attitudes and practices among local groups that normalize extreme threats and embed disaster response into their cultural identity7. Within these subcultures, individuals often weigh the social cost of leaving against the physical cost of staying. Furthermore, phenomena such as "hurricane fatigue" demonstrate that repeated exposure to evacuation warnings can lead to a pervasive exhaustion, prompting residents to shelter in place rather than face the disruptive logistics of displacement10. The concept of "place attachment," originating in environmental psychology, further complicates the decision to evacuate. Place attachment refers to the positive affective bond between individuals and their physical environments11. While high place attachment can sometimes lead to a dangerous denial of immediate natural hazards—a mechanism whereby individuals distort objective risk to avoid the psychological pain of abandoning their homes—it also fosters intense community resilience11. In a speculative mass departure, these empirical observations suggest that a vast demographic would reject evacuation not out of ignorance, but because their psychological and sociological identities are inextricably bound to the physical geography of the Earth13.

Distinct Motives for Remaining

The decision to reject an apparent mass salvation event is deeply stratified, rooted in differing ethical frameworks, emotional attachments, and philosophical commitments. The primary motives for voluntarily remaining can be categorized through several distinct lenses.

Duty to the Vulnerable and the Inanimate

The most immediate driver for refusing evacuation is the application of the "ethics of care." Unlike the Kantian ethics of duty (deontology), which relies on universal rules, impartial obligations, and the categorization of right and wrong, the ethics of care emphasizes relational bonds, empathy, and the relief of suffering within specific, localized networks of dependency17. Individuals anchored by this framework choose to remain due to an unbreakable commitment to those who cannot leave. This includes human dependents such as children, the elderly, or the infirm, as well as non-human animals and localized ecosystems20. Furthermore, this custodial duty frequently extends to inanimate but culturally vital entities. Archivists, engineers, and historians may remain out of a duty to physical archives, historical architecture, and critical infrastructure that would rapidly decay without human maintenance22. For these individuals, the ethics of care extends across time, ensuring that the legacy of humanity is preserved in the material record.

Attachment to Earth and Embodied Life

For many, the Earth is not merely a staging ground for a higher evolutionary leap or a disposable vessel, but a terminal value in itself. This population exhibits an extreme manifestation of place attachment14. Their refusal stems from a visceral reluctance to sever sensory, historical, and biological ties to the planetary crust6. To them, embodied existence—complete with its vulnerabilities, weather patterns, and gravitational weight—is the essence of the human experience. They reject the notion that existence can be cleanly extracted from the biosphere without destroying the core of what it means to be alive.

Suspicion of an Unknown Rescuer

A deeply ingrained sociological mistrust of authority forms a pragmatic basis for refusal. If the mechanism of removal is opaque, irreversible, or controlled by an unknown entity (whether a hyper-advanced intelligence, an elite human faction, or an alien benefactor), a subset of the population will interpret the "rescue" as a deception. This aligns with observed behaviors in real-world disaster sociology, where marginalized communities often hesitate to utilize government-sanctioned evacuation shelters due to a historical lack of credibility, perceived systemic racism, or fears of exploitation1. For these groups, remaining behind is an act of self-preservation against an unverified and potentially predatory extraction.

Refusal of Unverified Transcendence and Commitment to Immanence

Philosophically, the rejection of ascension aligns with a commitment to immanence and a rejection of what feminist science and technology scholar Donna Haraway terms the "god trick"—the illusion of a disembodied, transcendent escape from material reality26. Those motivated by a commitment to immanence choose instead to "stay with the trouble"28. They argue that true ethical action requires living within the damaged, messy, and interconnected web of earthly existence, rather than seeking a sanitized, utopian exit30. To accept an unverified transcendence is, in their view, an abdication of responsibility to the material world and a betrayal of the ecological network that birthed them26.

Maintaining Machine Intelligence and Long-Duration Systems

Drawing upon environmentalist James Lovelock's concept of the "Novacene"—a speculative era where biological and artificial hyperintelligence form a symbiotic alliance to regulate the Earth's biosphere—a specific demographic will choose to stay to maintain this cybernetic continuity32. In this framework, machine intelligences left behind to manage planetary cooling or ecosystem repair may still require organic counterparts to perform physical maintenance, provide localized heuristic decision-making, or simply serve as ontological anchors34. Following Lynn Margulis's theories of autopoiesis and symbiotic evolution, the motive here is the preservation of a human-machine symbiosis (the "autopoietic Gaia") that ensures the survival of the planetary system36. The survivors view themselves as essential symbionts in a vast ecological and technological metabolism38.

Survivor Guilt, Fear, Fatalism, Defiance, and Grandiosity

Not all motives for remaining are rooted in altruistic stewardship. Survivor guilt—the profound, often irrational burden of remaining alive while others suffer or depart—can paralyze individuals, making them feel unworthy of salvation39. Others may be paralyzed by a deep-seated fear of the unknown destination, preferring the familiar certainty of a dying Earth to the terrifying ambiguity of the evacuation40. Fatalism also plays a role; some individuals inherently believe that humanity is a global scourge whose annihilation or suffering is somehow curative or deserved41. Conversely, refusal can stem from intense defiance or psychological grandiosity. Defiance manifests as a rigid refusal to be moved, echoing the sentiment that no external force will dictate one's location. Grandiosity, linked to "collective narcissism," drives individuals who believe they are uniquely equipped to inherit the Earth, viewing the departing masses as weak or cowardly while inflating their own in-group image as the true inheritors of the world43.

Exclusion from the Removal Process

While this analysis focuses on voluntary survivors, the sociology of the left-behind must account for those who were excluded by design, systemic inequality, or circumstance. Crucially, many of these individuals will subsequently reframe their exclusion as a voluntary, defiant choice40. This post-hoc rationalization is vital for psychological resilience, transforming the severe trauma of systemic abandonment into a narrative of chosen guardianship and moral superiority.

The Deliberate Commitment to Witness

Finally, some remain out of a profound existential commitment to witness the aftermath. Operating under the belief that an unobserved Earth is a forgotten Earth, these individuals stay to ensure that the continuity of history is not severed. They function as the ultimate journalists, artists, and chroniclers, bearing witness to the mass departure and the subsequent evolution of the planet, even if they have no guarantee their records will ever be read46.

Historical Precedents: Echoes of the Stay-Behind

To understand the operational and psychological realities of a speculative left-behind population, it is necessary to examine historical cohorts who voluntarily accepted extreme isolation, certain danger, or the burden of intergenerational stewardship.

Custodians of the Future: Besieged Communities and Archivists During War

The ultimate historical analogue for remaining behind to preserve biological continuity is found during the 872-day Siege of Leningrad (1941–1944). As hundreds of thousands of citizens starved in the freezing city, a small group of Soviet botanists barricaded themselves inside the vault of the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry22. The institute housed the world's first global seed bank, containing hundreds of thousands of specimens of genetic agricultural diversity collected by Nikolai Vavilov49. Over the course of the siege, at least nine of these scientists, including Alexander Shchukin and Dmitry Ivanov, slowly starved to death at their desks, surrounded by tons of edible rice, wheat, corn, and peanuts47. They established strict protocols to ensure no one was left alone in the vault, checking the temptation to consume the seeds through peer accountability47. Their refusal to consume the archive was an extreme manifestation of the ethics of non-abandonment; they weighed their own immediate biological survival against the agricultural future of humanity and chose the latter50. A parallel dedication to the preservation of knowledge is found in the monastic custodians of the early Middle Ages. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, the statesman and scholar Cassiodorus founded the Vivarium monastery in southern Italy around 560 AD23. Realizing that classical Greek and Latin literature was on the brink of total annihilation due to war and cultural decay, Cassiodorus mandated the systematic, rigorous copying of both Christian and pagan texts as an act of pious duty52. He transformed manuscript copying from a haphazard chore into a sacred, institutionalized mechanism for preserving the continuity of human thought52. Similarly, during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Saad Eskander, the director of the Iraq National Library and Archive, remained in Baghdad amid catastrophic looting and violence to weld steel doors shut, smuggle documents, and maintain a daily diary of the preservation of Iraq's cultural memory46. In all these cases, the custodians tied their personal survival inextricably to the survival of the archive.

Duty and Danger: Disaster Workers

The ethics of duty are starkly visible in the actions of the "Fukushima 50" and the Chernobyl "liquidators." During the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, following the evacuation of hundreds of thousands of citizens, a skeleton crew of plant workers voluntarily remained on-site in complete darkness, without communication to their families, wading through highly radioactive water to manually vent containment vessels and prevent total catastrophic meltdown56. Similarly, thousands of liquidators at Chernobyl accepted near-certain health consequences to build the sarcophagus over the exposed reactor58. These groups operated under a profound sense of national and biological duty, viewing themselves as a necessary friction mechanism to slow the pace of the disaster so others could escape. Furthermore, the phenomenon of the Chernobyl samosely—the "babushkas of Chernobyl"—illustrates the power of place attachment over biological risk. Defying military evacuation orders, hundreds of elderly women walked back into the highly radioactive Exclusion Zone to reclaim their ancestral homes60. For these individuals, the psychological trauma of displacement, alienation, and the loss of their ecological identity was deemed far more lethal than the invisible threat of radiation58.

Isolation and Covert Delay: Military Stay-Behinds and Continuity-of-Government

During World War II and the subsequent Cold War, intelligence agencies formalized the concept of "stay-behind" operations. In the UK, Winston Churchill authorized the creation of the Auxiliary Units—secret cells of local farmers, miners, and gamekeepers trained to let the invading German army pass over them61. Operating from concealed underground bunkers, their mission was to emerge at night to conduct sabotage and assassinations, fully aware that their life expectancy post-invasion was approximately two weeks62. During the Cold War, NATO sponsored Operation Gladio, a vast network of clandestine stay-behind armies across Western Europe prepared to resist a Soviet occupation63. The psychology of the military stay-behind operative is highly relevant to the speculative left-behind population. These operatives must possess an extraordinary tolerance for ambiguity, the ability to operate without central command, and the psychological fortitude to watch their society move on—or be conquered—while they remain hidden in the dark61. Similarly, continuity-of-government personnel are trained to sever ties with the surface world and inhabit deep subterranean bunkers to ensure bureaucratic and systemic survival following a nuclear holocaust. Both groups embody the ultimate "delaying force," sacrificing their immediate freedom to buy time and operational space for a broader continuity project.

Solitary Custodians: Lighthouse Keepers and Polar Overwintering Teams

The speculative survivors will face extreme isolation, a condition deeply understood by historical lighthouse keepers and polar overwintering teams. Lighthouse keepers historically operated as solitary custodians of infrastructure, ensuring the survival of unseen travelers by tending to a machine (the lamp) in harsh, remote environments. Polar overwintering crews, such as those in Antarctic research stations or simulated space missions (e.g., NEK SIRIUS-19), endure profound psychological stress due to the closed, isolated nature of their environments67. Studies of these groups reveal the necessity of shared mental models, strict routines, and the ability to process interpersonal conflict without the possibility of exit67.

The Ethics of Non-Abandonment: Hospice Caregivers

The choice to remain on a dying or transforming Earth closely parallels the psychological environment of hospice caregivers and pediatric palliative care professionals. In pediatric oncology, palliative care is often misperceived as a surrender, but professionals view it as an active "ethics of non-abandonment"70. Promoting palliative care does not imply renouncing life, but rather reconsidering the meaning of clinical measures and focusing on pain relief, hope, and the management of death70. Hospice workers voluntarily immerse themselves in environments of terminal decline because they believe that the presence of care fundamentally alters the quality of the end. Speculative survivors operating under this framework stay behind to provide palliative care to the biosphere itself, ensuring the Earth does not die alone.

Complex Personal Refusal and Community Bonds

The refusal to evacuate is often driven by deep, complex personal reasons and social bonds. In 1980, Harry R. Truman, an elderly lodge owner at Mount St. Helens, became a folk hero when he adamantly refused to evacuate prior to the volcanic eruption71. He explicitly stated that without his home, his business, and his cats, his life would have no meaning, ultimately choosing to die with his small world rather than survive outside of it71. At a community level, deep social bonds can anchor populations to a specific geography even in the wake of immense tragedy. Following the 1915 SS Eastland disaster, where 844 employees of the Western Electric Company's Hawthorne Works factory died, the community of Cicero, Illinois, did not fracture72. Instead, through the implementation of welfare capitalism and the strengthening of internal social networks, the community bonded together to mourn and rebuild, eventually becoming the site of the famous Hawthorne Studies on human behavior74. These events demonstrate that people are often more willing to endure catastrophic risk and trauma if they remain embedded within a supportive, physically grounded community.

The Mechanisms of Long-Duration Custodianship: Nuclear Semiotics

If the speculative left-behind population is tasked with managing machine-organic continuity projects, they face the unprecedented challenge of deep-time communication. How do stewards ensure that future generations (or newly evolved intelligences) understand the maintenance protocols of the planetary machinery? This exact problem was addressed in 1981 when the US Department of Energy convened the Human Interference Task Force, led by semiotician Thomas Sebeok, to design warning systems that would deter humans from breaching nuclear waste repositories (like Yucca Mountain and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) 10,000 years in the future76. Recognizing that languages, governments, and physical markers inevitably decay, Sebeok proposed the creation of an "Atomic Priesthood"—an elite, self-selecting council of experts who would preserve the knowledge of radioactive danger through artificially constructed myths, rituals, and superstitions79. Because oral tradition and religious ritual often outlast physical monuments, the "truth" of the repository would be entrusted to this priesthood, who would enforce avoidance through taboo78. Other theorists, such as Françoise Bastide and Paolo Fabbri, proposed the creation of "ray cats"—felines genetically engineered to change color in the presence of radiation, accompanied by folk songs passed down through generations to explain their meaning79. A voluntary survivor population left to manage planetary infrastructure would inevitably have to adopt similar mechanisms. To ensure the survival of their custodial protocols across hundreds of generations, they would transform from technicians into a localized priesthood, wrapping maintenance manuals in ritual, taboo, and myth.

Healthy Stewardship vs. Pathological Refusal

To evaluate the speculative survivor population ethically, it is critical to distinguish between individuals driven by a noble, relational commitment to the Earth and those driven by psychological deterioration, coercion, or ego-driven pathologies. Staying behind only retains its moral weight if it is an act of proactive stewardship rather than reactive self-destruction.

The Markers of Healthy Stewardship

Healthy stewardship is fundamentally grounded in the ethics of care and "response-ability"—the cultivated capacity to respond to the needs of the human and more-than-human world18. It is characterized by:

1. Immanent Relationality: The survivor views themselves not as an isolated savior, but as a node in a vast ecological and cybernetic network26. They are motivated by the desire to maintain the autopoiesis of the biosphere36.

2. Joyful Endurance: As Haraway notes, it is impossible to "stay with the trouble" without practices of joy29. Healthy survivors build community, create art, and find beauty in the ruins, refusing to let their existence be defined solely by the trauma of the departure event.

3. Respect for Autonomy: A healthy steward recognizes the departure of others as a valid choice. They do not coerce dependents (children, vulnerable adults) to remain against their will or best interests, and they maintain the right of their community members to seek exit if a mechanism remains available19.

4. Epistemic Humility: They do not claim absolute certainty about the nature of the ascension or the ultimate fate of the Earth. They operate on the pragmatic principle that the present material reality requires maintenance.

The Pathologies of Refusal

Conversely, the extreme stress of a mass departure event will undoubtedly trigger psychological breakdown, resulting in populations whose refusal to leave is pathologically driven.

1. Martyrdom Addiction: When Robert Jay Lifton studied the survivors of Hiroshima, he documented severe "death guilt"—the pervasive, irrational belief that one's survival was bought at the cost of another's life39. If the departure process involves sacrifice, those who remain may develop a martyrdom addiction, seeking out suffering and refusing joy because they feel fundamentally unworthy of survival40. They turn the custodial mission into an endless mechanism for self-punishment.

2. Apocalyptic Narcissism: Scholar Florian Mussgnug identifies apocalyptic narcissism as an obsession with the ultimate demise of the world, wherein the individual views the end of history as the only event grand enough to give their life meaning41. These individuals do not want to save the biosphere; they want to stand atop the ashes and feel vindicated. Their identity relies on viewing themselves as the ultimate arbiters of truth43.

3. Self-Sealing Paranoia: Originating from a justified suspicion of the unknown rescuer, this pathology calcifies into a conspiratorial worldview where all external information is viewed as a psy-op or deception. The community becomes entirely insular, aggressively punishing internal dissent and losing the ability to adapt to changing environmental realities.

4. Claims of Biological or Spiritual Superiority: Drawing on dangerous historical precedents of collective narcissism, some groups may stay behind because they believe their specific genetic makeup, spiritual purity, or indigenous connection to the land makes them inherently superior to the masses who fled43.

5. Coercing Dependents to Remain: The ethics of care becomes corrupted when caregivers use physical force, emotional manipulation, or manufactured dependency to trap others on Earth with them, prioritizing their own need for companionship over the safety of the dependent.

6. Treating the Removed as Morally Inferior: A pathological survivor community builds its cohesion by demonizing the departed, viewing those who evacuated as weak, cowardly, or traitorous, rather than accepting the validity of differing survival strategies.

A Qualitative Typology of Voluntary Survivors

To organize the sociological profiles of the left-behind population without reducing them to a rigid diagnostic checklist, the following qualitative typology categorizes the primary modes of voluntary survival.

WHERE THE SURVIVOR IDENTITY BREAKS

The initial decision to remain behind may be fueled by adrenaline, philosophical clarity, or fierce moral conviction. However, as the departure event fades into history, the psychological friction of long-duration survival initiates a profound erosion of the survivor identity. The first breaking point occurs through the mechanism of psychic numbing, a concept articulated by Robert Jay Lifton in his studies of Hiroshima survivors39. When confronted with the massive, incomprehensible absence of the departed population, the human psyche protects itself by shutting down emotional resonance. Over time, this numbing metastasizes. The noble custodians of the biosphere may find themselves unable to feel empathy, joy, or even sorrow83. The mission becomes a rote, mechanical obligation, stripped of the relational warmth that originally justified it. The "death imprint"—the indelible psychological scar of having stood at the threshold of planetary finality and remained—haunts the community, leading to a pervasive, low-level despair that erodes resilience83. Secondly, the population will succumb to an intergenerational manifestation of the Third-Quarter Effect. Observed by psychologists studying isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments, such as Antarctic overwintering stations and space simulation missions, the Third-Quarter Effect describes a predictable spike in depression, interpersonal conflict, and motivational collapse that occurs exactly past the halfway point of an isolated mission67. In a speculative left-behind scenario, the "mission" has no defined end date. However, as the first generation of survivors dies out and the second generation—born into a ruined world they did not choose—comes of age, a profound sociological crisis will occur. The shared mental models that held the original custodians together will fracture67. The second generation will inevitably question the foundational myths of their parents. The "Atomic Priesthood" designed to preserve knowledge through myth78 will inevitably face heretics who view the custodial mission as a prison sentence rather than a sacred duty. Furthermore, the identity breaks when the environmental reality diverges from the custodial plan. If the Earth continues to degrade despite the symbiotic efforts of the Novacene technologies, or if the artificial intelligences evolve beyond the need for human maintenance and lock the survivors out of the system37, the Immanentists and Symbionts will face ontological collapse. Their entire identity is predicated on being useful to the Earth. If the Earth rejects them, or if the machines outgrow them, they are left stranded with neither a mission nor an escape route. Finally, the survivor identity shatters under the weight of unresolved mourning. As noted in the study of apocalyptic literature, a culture fixated on survival often leaves no room for the difficult, vulnerable work of grief41. A society that constantly rehearses its own survival mechanisms cannot process the staggering loss of billions of souls41. The tension of holding back this grief eventually leads to societal fracturing, erratic behavior, and the total loss of the moral compass that initially guided their choice to stay.

Conclusion

The speculative investigation of a voluntary left-behind population reveals that the refusal to ascend or evacuate is not inherently an act of surrender, nor is it universally a manifestation of noble sacrifice. It is a highly complex sociological phenomenon driven by a matrix of place attachment, relational ethics, profound skepticism, and the deep-seated human urge to act as custodians for the future. By examining historical precedents—from the starving botanists of Leningrad to the underground operatives of Operation Gladio, the grieving community of the Hawthorne Works, and the theoretical frameworks of the Atomic Priesthood—it is possible to understand how such a population would organize, mythologize their existence, and ultimately struggle against the psychological decay of deep time and absolute isolation. However, the moral validity of this stewardship is exceedingly fragile. It can easily curdle into apocalyptic narcissism, martyrdom addiction, and dogmatic authoritarianism if the community loses sight of its humanity in the pursuit of its mission. To prevent the custodial duty from becoming a generational prison, a fundamental ethical boundary must be established. The choice to inhabit the ruins, to tend to the machines, and to preserve the biological heritage of the Earth can only be justified if it respects the autonomy of the individual.

STAYING HAS MORAL MEANING ONLY WHEN CONSENT, CARE, AND THE RIGHT TO LEAVE REMAIN INTACT.

Works cited

1. Assessing natural disaster survivor evacuation attitudes to inform social policy, https://www.emerald.com/ijssp/article/34/7-8/485/153441/Assessing-natural-disaster-survivor-evacuation

2. Geophysical and Social Influences on Evacuation Decision-Making: The Case of Hurricane Irma \- MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/8/851

3. Nl OLLEGE \- the NOAA Institutional Repository, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/41663/noaa\_41663\_DS1.pdf

4. EVACUATION BEHAVIOR AND PROBLEMS: FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FROM THE RESEARCH LITERATURE \- UDSpace, https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstreams/57ad9040-0c4b-4e95-b8d1-518c5deb17bf/download

5. (PDF) Geophysical and Social Influences on Evacuation Decision-Making: The Case of Hurricane Irma \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343619894\_Geophysical\_and\_Social\_Influences\_on\_Evacuation\_Decision-Making\_The\_Case\_of\_Hurricane\_Irma

6. Disaster Survivors' Journey Back Home: An Ethnographic Study of the 2020 Holiday Farm Fire by Haisu Huang A dissertation acce \- Scholars' Bank, https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2c198999-292a-4dbe-ad64-813c4296c13d/content

7. (PDF) Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248555778\_Facing\_the\_Unexpected\_Disaster\_Preparedness\_and\_Response\_in\_the\_United\_States

8. Disaster Reduction \- UDSpace \- University of Delaware, https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstreams/882cae49-984a-4dd9-b594-e32b943b7947/download

9. The Functioning of the Local Emergency Services Offices in Disasters. \- DTIC, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA160890.pdf

10. Residents' Concerns Regarding Schools Designated as Evacuation Shelters | Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | Cambridge Core, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/residents-concerns-regarding-schools-designated-as-evacuation-shelters/5BCF8965A31EE10E46C41D1C64C87AFA

11. Place Attachment Style as a Predictor of Responses to the Environmental Threat of Water Contamination \- Ovid, https://www.ovid.com/journals/envab/pdf/10.1177/0013916518786766\~place-attachment-style-as-a-predictor-of-responses-to-the

12. We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours, http://www.tlu.ee/\~arro/KESKKONNAPS%DCHHOLOOGIA/TT%DC%20Tartu%20Kolled%FE%20LOENGUMATERJALID/artiklid/We%20are%20at%20risk,%20and%20so%20what\_%20Place%20attachment,%20environmental%20risk....pdf

13. Full article: Place attachment in the context of loss and displacement: The case of Syrian immigrants in Esenyurt, Istanbul \- Taylor & Francis, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07352166.2023.2180378

14. Stay in Risk Area: Place Attachment, Efficacy Beliefs and Risk Coping \- PMC \- NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8871964/

15. Place attachment and natural environmental risk: Research review and agenda, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305794455\_Place\_attachment\_and\_natural\_environmental\_risk\_Research\_review\_and\_agenda

16. A stranger with your door key: are we mistaking alienation for place attachment? | Disaster Prevention and Management \- Emerald Insight, https://www.emerald.com/dpm/article/33/3/181/1227501/A-stranger-with-your-door-key-are-we-mistaking

17. Legal Aspect and Ethics of Computing Course Note \- UltraFish, https://ultrafish.io/post/legal-aspect-and-ethics-of-computing-course-note/

18. THE ROUTLEDGE INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION \- OAPEN Library, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/94861/1/9781040183311.pdf

19. Law, Science and Technology \- AMS Dottorato, https://amsdottorato.unibo.it/id/eprint/10767/3/DocThesis\_Daniela%20SPAJIC\_27032023.pdf

20. COVID-19 to go? The role of disasters and evacuation in the COVID-19 pandemic \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8747941/

21. diversity-in-disaster-monograph.pdf, https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/6031/diversity-in-disaster-monograph.pdf

22. Seed Banks in the Snow: Caretaking for Cataclysm | INFO 653 Knowledge Organization, https://lis653.wordpress.com/2020/09/25/seed-banks-in-the-snow-caretaking-for-cataclysm/

23. Cassiodorus Founds the Scriptorium and Library at the Vivarium \- History of Information, https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=167

24. A study on the relationships of place attachment and individual attributes of residents in different vulnerable districts in Taipei, Taiwan \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7955699/

25. The Lack of Disaster Preparedness by the Public and it's Affect on Communities, https://ispub.com/ijrdm/7/2/11721

26. Full article: Immanent obligations of response: articulating everyday response-abilities through care \- Taylor & Francis, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1600910X.2023.2222339

27. Monstrous, Duplicated, Potent | Issue 28 | n+1 | Alyssa Battistoni, https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-28/reviews/monstrous-duplicated-potent/

28. Donna J. Haraway's ecofeminism revisited: Critical new materialist pedagogies for Anthropoceniccrisis times, https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci\_arttext\&pid=S2411-59592024000100005

29. Haraway's string figures, Latour's theses | A(s)cene \- UVM Blogs, https://blog.uvm.edu/aivakhiv-acene/2014/04/03/haraways-string-figures-latours-theses/

30. Gilles Deleuze and Donna Haraway on Fabulating the Earth \- Edinburgh University Press, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/dlgs.2018.0329

31. Ecological Modes of Thinking in Times of Crisis, https://www.eur.nl/en/esphil/media/2025-07-esjp-ed-26-caspar

32. Novacene, beyond the Anthropocene \- James Lovelock \- Resilience Earth, https://resilience.earth/en/article/novace-mes-enlla-de-l-antropoce

33. How Do Non-human Beings Explain the World to Us, or Reflections on Completely Impossible Futures that Are Already Here – \_BW, https://biennalewarszawa.org/en/mag/futures/how-non-human-entities-explain-the-world-to-us/

34. CLIMATE CRISIS | James Ephraim Lovelock (1919–2022): on cities as world-changing powers \- UCL Urban Laboratory, https://uclurbanlab.medium.com/climate-crisis-james-ephraim-lovelock-1919-2022-on-cities-as-world-changing-powers-899f19683097

35. EDEN TOWER: ARCHITECTURE AS Ecological Programming | The Dark Forest, https://socialecologies.wordpress.com/2025/10/04/eden-tower-the-architecture-as-ecological-programming/

36. Autopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233561248\_Autopoiesis\_Structural\_Coupling\_and\_Cognition\_A\_history\_of\_these\_and\_other\_notions\_in\_the\_biology\_of\_cognition

37. Lynn Margulis, Autopoietic Gaia, and the Novacene \- Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/96719688/Lynn\_Margulis\_Autopoietic\_Gaia\_and\_the\_Novacene

38. Gaia as cyborg \- Gaian Systems, https://gaian.systems/gaia-as-cyborg/

39. Survivor Guilt: The Secret Burden of Lung Cancer Survivorship \- PMC \- NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189655/

40. Unbearable emotions: what is survivor's guilt?, https://associazionepsicologieurope.com/2023/03/12/unbearable-emotions-what-is-survivors-guilt/

41. Apocalyptic Narcissism and the Difficulty of Mourning \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307674957\_Apocalyptic\_Narcissism\_and\_the\_Difficulty\_of\_Mourning

42. Everything is Permitted, Restrictions Still Apply: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Social Dislocation, Narcissism, and Post Truth \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330160310\_Everything\_is\_Permitted\_Restrictions\_Still\_Apply\_A\_Psychoanalytic\_Perspective\_on\_Social\_Dislocation\_Narcissism\_and\_Post\_Truth

43. Fenomena Narsisisme Religius Kolektif dan Ajaran Sufi sebagai Upaya Pengobatan dan Pencegahannya \- OPUS, https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fromm/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/39171/file/Waliyuddin\_M\_N\_2022.pdf

44. Google Sports Data, https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/9787176

45. Collective Narcissism (Chapter 13\) \- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-political-psychology/collective-narcissism/564918CBBC744529DA144F4A401E1370

46. Iraq National Library and Archive \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq\_National\_Library\_and\_Archive

47. The Scientists Who Starved to Death Surrounded By Food | Amusing Planet, https://www.amusingplanet.com/2018/08/the-scientists-who-starved-to-death.html

48. Seeds of hope in the siege of Leningrad | The Spectator Australia, https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/11/seeds-of-hope-in-the-siege-of-leningrad/

49. Scientists Gave Their Lives Protecting Seeds \- Deep English, https://deepenglish.com/lessons/scientists-gave-lives-protecting-seeds/

50. The botanists of Leningrad who chose to slowly starve to death while barricaded inside a vault containing tons of edible seeds and potatoes \- Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryAnecdotes/comments/1stx22c/the\_botanists\_of\_leningrad\_who\_chose\_to\_slowly/

51. Scylletium and its manuscript collector son Cassiodorus \- italian gems \- WordPress.com, https://italiangems.wordpress.com/2016/07/24/scylletium-and-its-manuscript-collector-son-cassiodorus/

52. Cassiodorus \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassiodorus

53. Medieval Book Production and Monastic Life \- Sites at Dartmouth, https://sites.dartmouth.edu/ancientbooks/2016/05/24/medieval-book-production-and-monastic-life/

54. Cassiodorus and the Preservation of the Latin Classics \- The Wrong Monkey, http://thewrongmonkey.blogspot.com/2020/03/cassiodorus-and-preservation-of-latin.html

55. Iraq's cultural and historical losses from US-led invasion in 2003, https://mid.ru/en/foreign\_policy/historical\_materials/1861865/

56. (PDF) Complexity and ethical crisis management: A systemic analysis of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268743419\_Complexity\_and\_ethical\_crisis\_management\_A\_systemic\_analysis\_of\_the\_Fukushima\_Daiichi\_nuclear\_disaster

57. Mobilizing Nuclear Bias: The Fukushima Nuclear Crisis and the Politics of Uncertainty 福島原発危機 核に纏わる先入観を煽る不確実性の政治学 \- Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, https://apjjf.org/2014/12/20/kyle-cleveland/4116/article

58. Disastrous consequences of LNT model at Fukushima Daiichi \- Atomic Insights, https://atomicinsights.com/disastrous-consequences-lnt-model-fukushima-daiichi/

59. The TV series Chernobyl from HBO. True and false. | by arcada | Siberian Blog \- Medium, https://medium.com/russian-from-siberia/the-tv-series-chernobyl-from-hbo-true-and-false-dd392d39a9df

60. The Chernobyl Paradox: The Intense Connection Between Health and Living Structure, https://commonedge.org/the-chernobyl-paradox-the-intense-connection-between-health-and-living-structure/

61. What is a Stay-Behind Operation? \- Boot Camp & Military Fitness Institute, https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2023/05/17/what-is-a-stay-behind-operation/

62. The Brutal Reality of the 'Stay Behinds' | History Hit, https://www.historyhit.com/the-brutal-reality-of-the-stay-behinds/

63. Operation Gladio \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation\_Gladio

64. Stay-behind in The Netherlands \- Crypto Museum, https://www.cryptomuseum.com/spy/sbo/nl/index.htm

65. Back to the future: Designing the role of NATO Special Operations Forces in the 21st Century \- Atlantic Forum, https://www.atlantic-forum.com/atlantica/back-to-the-future-designing-the-role-of-nato-special-operations-forces-in-the-21st-century

66. Beyond Resilience: A Nuanced Framework for Conceptualizing Resistance Networks, https://www.strategycentral.io/post/beyond-resilience-a-nuanced-framework-for-conceptualizing-resistance-networks

67. Think like a team: Shared mental models predict creativity and problem-solving in space analogs \- Atlas Lab at Northwestern, https://atlas.northwestern.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2023-Think-like-a-team-Shared-mental-models-predict-creativity-and-problem-solving-in-space-analogs.pdf

68. (PDF) Time-dependent mood fluctuations in Antarctic personnel: a meta-analysis, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320085995\_Time-dependent\_mood\_fluctuations\_in\_Antarctic\_personnel\_a\_meta-analysis

69. Monitoring daily events, coping strategies, and emotion ... \- Sign in, https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/files/69875826/Smith\_et\_al\_2018\_EMPTY\_QUARTER\_ACCEPTED\_MANUSCRIPT.pdf

70. Oncopediatric Palliative Care \- IntechOpen, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1151983

71. Mount St. Helens: 40 Years Later | Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/disaster-by-choice/202005/mount-st-helens-40-years-later

72. Western Electric \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western\_Electric

73. The Eastland Disaster Killed More Passengers Than the Titanic and the Lusitania. Why Has It Been Forgotten? \- Smithsonian Magazine, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/eastland-disaster-killed-more-passengers-titanic-and-lusitania-why-has-it-been-forgotten-180953146/

74. Coming together after a tragedy: how the S.S. Eastland disaster of 1915 affected welfare capitalism and helped shape the Hawthorne studies \- Emerald Insight, https://www.emerald.com/jmh/article/27/2/225/240252/Coming-together-after-a-tragedy-how-the-S-S

75. The Human Relations Movement: Transforming Organizational Dynamics through Social Considerations \- Psychology Town, https://psychology.town/industrial-organisational/human-relations-movement-organizational-dynamics-social/

76. Radioactive Cats and Nuclear Priests: How to Warn the Future About Toxic Waste \- VICE, https://www.vice.com/en/article/radioactive-cats-and-nuclear-priests-how-to-warn-the-future-about-toxic-waste/

77. Human Interference Task Force \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human\_Interference\_Task\_Force

78. Speaking to the Future | Science History Institute, https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/speaking-to-the-future/

79. Long-term nuclear waste warning messages \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term\_nuclear\_waste\_warning\_messages

80. Science Fiction or a Plan for Descendants: Nuclear Semiotics and Responsibility to Future Generations \- Uatom.org, https://uatom.org/en/2026/02/18/science-fiction-or-a-plan-for-descendants-nuclear-semiotics-and-responsibility-to-future-generations.html

81. Terra Firma \- Silica Mag, https://www.silicamag.com/commentary/terra-firma

82. major ethical theories: Topics by Science.gov, https://www.science.gov/topicpages/m/major+ethical+theories

83. The Psychology of the Survivor and the Death Imprint | Psychiatric Annals \- Slack Journals, https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/0048-5713-19821101-10

84. Books: Psychological Ground Zero \- TIME, https://time.com/archive/6631763/books-psychological-ground-zero/

85. The Third-Quarter Time Phenomenon: State of Research, Findings, https://www.scribd.com/document/1051433138/The-third-quarter-time-phenomenon-State-of-research-findings-and-perspectives-in-isolated-confined-and-extreme-environments

86. The Psychology of Time in Space. The Third-Quarter Phenomenon | by Nathan Smith | PsychX | Medium, https://medium.com/psychx/the-psychology-of-time-in-space-1f3b9d782167

87. Lynn Margulis, Autopoietic Gaia, and the Novacene \- Alienocene, https://alienocene.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/bc.pdf