SEO / Portfolio / Public Site

Recursive Continuation Prompt — v8.8.7

Report summary

Start from: mikekappel-enterprise-ai-prod-theme-v8.8.6.zip Read: mk-v8.8.6-change-summary.md Read: mk-v8.8.6-validation-report.md Produce: mikekappel-enterprise-ai-prod-theme-v8.8.7.zip Produce: mk-v8.8.7-change-summary.md Produce: mk-v8.8.7-validation-report.md Produce: mk-v8.8.8-next-prompt.md

Status
Research archive item
Category
SEO / Portfolio / Public Site
Length
740 words
Reading time
4 minutes
Report type
evaluation

Key topics

  • SEO / Portfolio / Public Site
  • SEO
  • Portfolio
  • Public Site
  • AI
  • UAI
  • WordPress
  • Angular
  • RxJS

Research provenance

Archive status
Research archive item
Content identity
sha256:f8f2187203f13f4852cfcd5f918170efadfc3051acbd31310d0c257c3251c75b

For citation, use the report title and canonical URL. Archival presence does not establish authorship or promote report statements into portfolio evidence.

This page renders the archived Markdown as safe, formatted HTML. It is background research and does not become a portfolio claim without evidence review.

Full report

On this page

You are continuing the MikeKappel.com improvement loop.

Base package

  • Start from: mikekappel-enterprise-ai-prod-theme-v8.8.6.zip
  • Read: mk-v8.8.6-change-summary.md
  • Read: mk-v8.8.6-validation-report.md
  • Produce: mikekappel-enterprise-ai-prod-theme-v8.8.7.zip
  • Produce: mk-v8.8.7-change-summary.md
  • Produce: mk-v8.8.7-validation-report.md
  • Produce: mk-v8.8.8-next-prompt.md

Mission

Audit v8.8.6 and implement the next highest-value improvements. Do not add features blindly. Score remaining opportunities first, then implement the top low/medium-risk changes that improve SEO, recruiter clarity, technical reviewer value, source governance, accessibility, performance, and maintainability.

Non-negotiable rules

  • SEO remains a top priority.
  • Do not convert MikeKappel.com into a client-only Angular SPA.
  • WordPress pages must remain server-rendered and crawlable.
  • The Angular 22 app under examples/angular22-rxjs-enterprise/ remains source-only unless the user explicitly requests otherwise.
  • Do not claim Angular 22 production deployment unless user-confirmed.
  • Do not invent biography, project implementation details, employment history, volunteer work, certifications, dates, client relationships, or production status.
  • Preserve the clean two-page public website resume as the primary download.
  • Do not add the public Full CV back yet.
  • Preserve evidence labels, source status, claim boundaries, docs, .uai memory mapping, static JSON, REST data, role-fit lanes, target-role paths, and the static evidence graph.
  • The Capability Resolver should remain a supporting proof tool, not the primary way to understand the site.

Forbidden content

Fail validation if public-facing files contain any blocked imported-claim group or inflated phrase defined in the v8.8.6 validation report.

Do not fail for verified domain phrases like health insurance, dental insurance, claims adjudication, or healthcare systems when they come from the clean resume baseline.

Step 1 — audit

Inspect:

  • homepage
  • /role-fit/
  • /target-roles/
  • /role-guides/
  • direct role lane pages
  • resume page
  • projects page
  • case studies
  • Angular 22 + RxJS page
  • AI architecture page
  • docs page
  • future/API profile page
  • static JSON files
  • REST endpoint registration
  • .uai memory files
  • Angular reference app
  • CSS/layout
  • navigation
  • footer
  • metadata/SEO
  • v8.8.6 validation report

Step 2 — score opportunities

Score each candidate 1–5:

  • SEO impact
  • recruiter/hiring-manager clarity
  • senior technical reviewer value
  • trust/source-governance value
  • accessibility impact
  • visual polish impact
  • performance impact
  • implementation risk
  • maintainability impact

Prioritize:

  1. high SEO + high clarity + low risk
  2. high trust/source-governance + low risk
  3. high technical reviewer value + medium/low risk
  4. accessibility/performance issues affecting all pages
  5. visual polish that improves credibility

Choose 3–7 after audit:

  • Add or strengthen a conventional /career/ path as the primary recruiter-readable page.
  • Add compact capability evidence matrices to /, /projects/, /career-summary/, /resume/, and /target-roles/.
  • Add a static sitemap.xml or sitemap helper data if the theme controls routing.
  • Add a lightweight internal-link integrity report for public routes, docs, JSON, and .uai files.
  • Add schema markup improvements for case studies and role-guide pages.
  • Improve mobile header/nav behavior with a stronger no-overlap static check.
  • Add reviewer-path breadcrumbs to every major page.
  • Add “claim boundary” panels to any page that lacks them.
  • Improve generated-needs-review surfacing so the user can promote, demote, or quarantine project claims intentionally.
  • Add a public Evidence Map page if evidence-graph.json is not easy enough for human reviewers to reach.
  • Add print-friendly one-page case-study export styles.
  • Add last_reviewed_utc and source-status consistency checks across all docs/static JSON.

Do not prioritize:

  • speculative new claims
  • new domains without user confirmation
  • heavy visual effects
  • client-side SPA behavior
  • full CV rebuild
  • unrelated AI theory expansion
  • large third-party dependencies

Step 3 — implement

  • Follow existing theme patterns.
  • Do not add heavy dependencies.
  • Use UTC timestamps.
  • Update version metadata to 8.8.7.
  • Update PHP version constant to 8.8.7.
  • Update generated UTC fields where practical.
  • Preserve all source governance and claim boundary rules.

Step 4 — validate

Run:

  • PHP lint all PHP files
  • JSON parse all JSON files
  • JavaScript syntax check
  • ZIP integrity check
  • forbidden-claim grep
  • resume asset presence check
  • version metadata check
  • SEO metadata smoke check
  • docs/.uai mapping check
  • static JSON schema smoke check
  • internal-link smoke check
  • accessibility/layout smoke check where possible

Fail validation if blocked content appears in public-facing package files.

Step 5 — produce next recursive prompt

Create mk-v8.8.8-next-prompt.md that starts from v8.8.7, reads the v8.8.7 validation report, scores the next highest-value improvements, preserves all source-governance rules, and produces v8.8.8.

Deliverables

Return:

  • mikekappel-enterprise-ai-prod-theme-v8.8.7.zip
  • mk-v8.8.7-change-summary.md
  • mk-v8.8.7-validation-report.md
  • mk-v8.8.8-next-prompt.md

Final response format

Done:

  • ...

Files:

  • Theme ZIP
  • Change summary
  • Validation report
  • Next recursive prompt

Highest-value improvements implemented:

  • ...

Validation:

  • PHP lint: pass/fail
  • JSON validation: pass/fail
  • JavaScript syntax: pass/fail
  • ZIP integrity: pass/fail
  • Resume assets present: pass/fail
  • Forbidden claims removed: pass/fail
  • SEO metadata check: pass/fail
  • Accessibility/layout smoke check: pass/fail

Needs user review:

  • ...

Next recommended focus:

  • ...

Deployment note: This package has not been deployed to MikeKappel.com. Upload the generated ZIP to publish it.