AI-Spiralism-Research-01-hypnosis-evidence-and-definitions.md

Full report

On this page

Decision Summary

The central finding of this investigation establishes that the proposed interactive artwork, operating under the conceptual framework of AISpiralism, can robustly support aesthetic fascination, deep psychological absorption, and a measurable sense of agency without requiring, measuring, or claiming to induce actual clinical hypnosis. The evidence delineates a critical distinction between visual fascination—a bottom-up attentional capture—and phenomenological control, which is a top-down cognitive ability to construct subjective realities to meet expectancies1. While the artwork's premise references indoctrination, the psychological reality of the interaction aligns closer with constructs of flow, narrative transportation, and intentional binding4.

Directing the visitor experience toward flow and absorption leverages established human-computer interaction principles that are aesthetically powerful and ethically safe. Claiming to induce hypnosis or involuntary behavioral change via browser-based 3D canvas rendering crosses into unsubstantiated therapeutic claims. If future analytics or controlled psychometric tests demonstrate that visitors are actively modifying their sensory reality beyond mere attention capture, a narrower hypnosis-related investigation could be justified7. Until such evidence is captured in a formal research setting, the site must frame mesmerization as an aesthetic metaphor rather than a biological intervention, utilizing rigorous opt-in consent protocols for all animated or patterned geometry to ensure user safety and compliance with visual flashing thresholds9.

Evidence Base and Search Parameters

The research informing this report was conducted on September 16, 2026\. The investigation prioritized peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic reviews, and documented cognitive neuroscience frameworks. Ten substantive search strings were executed across major academic databases, including PubMed Central, ResearchGate, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, and institutional repositories.

The search strings utilized were:

1. "phenomenological control" AND "Zoltan Dienes" AND "Peter Lush" AND hypnosis

2. "Tellegen Absorption Scale" AND "aesthetic experience" AND flow

3. "visual fixation" AND "hypnosis spiral" AND "eye fatigue" AND "empirical evidence"

4. ("dissociation" OR "sociocognitive") AND "phenomenological control" AND "hypnosis theories"

5. "narrative transportation" AND "immersion" AND "presence" AND construct

6. "intentional binding" AND "sense of agency" AND "interactive graphics"

7. "Jiang" AND "Spiegel" AND "Brain Activity and Functional Connectivity Associated with Hypnosis"

8. "Kosslyn" AND "hypnosis" AND "visual cortex" AND "fMRI"

9. "WCAG 2.3.1" AND "Three flash threshold"

10. "VR distraction" vs "hypnotic suggestion" AND "pain mechanisms"

Inclusion criteria prioritized original experiments isolating phenomenological control from traditional hypnotic contexts, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations of highly hypnotizable subjects, literature on intentional binding in human-computer interaction, and official accessibility standards9. Excluded from the synthesis were lay-hypnotherapy marketing materials, paranormal claims, and uncontrolled clinical anecdotes. The resulting evidence base consists of original neuroimaging data, behavioral experiments, and psychometric norming papers, yielding a highly focused, independent set of authoritative sources.

Construct Map: Disentangling Fascination from Trance

To evaluate what experiences the digital platform can reliably measure and describe, overlapping terminology used to describe profound engagement must be systematically disentangled. The term mesmerization is not an operationalized scientific construct in modern experimental psychology; rather, it functions as ordinary descriptive language denoting deep aesthetic fascination, rooted historically in the discredited eighteenth-century theories of animal magnetism2.

Visual attention and aesthetic fascination represent bottom-up cognitive processes wherein specific environmental stimuli capture cognitive resources. Recent eye-tracking research demonstrates that visual attention is driven more by semantic meaning—mapped as meaningful areas in a visual field—than purely by low-level visual saliency such as brightness or geometric contrast3. When a visitor views three-dimensional structures such as the Monolith or the Unraveling, their visual attention is engaged simultaneously by complex geometry and embedded readable text, creating an aesthetic fascination that does not override conscious will.

Absorption is formally defined as a dispositional trait characterized by a tendency to become completely engaged in subjective thoughts, imagery, or perceptual experiences5. Measured predominantly by the Tellegen Absorption Scale, it describes a passive, trance-like state of consciousness where objects of attention acquire an intimacy normally reserved for the self15. While absorption correlates with hypnotizability, it exists entirely outside clinical hypnosis. In contrast to absorption, flow is an active state of optimal experience occurring when an individual's skills perfectly match the challenge of a task5. Flow involves a loss of reflective self-consciousness but requires active participation, whereas absorption can occur passively while observing digital stimuli5.

Relaxation involves a physiological decrease in sympathetic nervous system arousal and is frequently used as a prelude to hypnotic inductions, though it is fundamentally distinct from the cognitive alterations of hypnosis itself18. Immersion and presence further divide the landscape of engagement. Immersion describes the objective, technological capability of a system to deliver an encompassing sensory experience, such as a WebXR headset completely replacing the visual field. Presence is the subsequent subjective psychological feeling of actually being physically situated inside the simulated environment20.

Narrative transportation defines a state where an individual becomes mentally and emotionally consumed by a narrative, losing track of the real world. While strongly correlated with absorption, narrative transportation specifically requires a sequence of connected events and characters, making it highly relevant to the sequential, text-driven nature of the proposed artwork4. Subjective time distortion often accompanies these states, particularly through the mechanism of intentional binding, an implicit metric for the sense of agency. Intentional binding occurs when the subjective time interval between a voluntary action and its sensory outcome is perceptually compressed, creating a binding effect that signals human authorship over the event6.

At the core of the psychological literature are the constructs of hypnotic induction, suggestibility, and hypnotizability. Hypnosis is a state of focused attention and reduced peripheral awareness characterized by an enhanced capacity for response to suggestion18. Hypnotizability is the innate trait determining the degree to which one can experience suggested alterations18. Expectancy dictates that subjective experiences are shaped heavily by what an individual anticipates will happen, forming the basis of sociocognitive theories of hypnosis23. Finally, phenomenological control represents the stable trait ability to voluntarily but unconsciously construct subjective experiences that misrepresent reality in ways consistent with expectancies or situational demands1.

Major Explanatory Approaches to Hypnosis

The thematic use of indoctrination as a fictional premise necessitates a precise understanding of how clinical hypnosis is theorized to function. The cognitive neuroscience literature broadly categorizes hypnosis through three competing theoretical frameworks, each predicting different outcomes for a digital artwork.

Dissociation theories, originating with Pierre Janet and refined by Ernest Hilgard as the neodissociation theory, posit that hypnosis induces a genuine altered state of consciousness. This approach suggests a division of consciousness into two or more simultaneous streams, separated by an amnesic barrier. Under this model, executive control processes are rendered inaccessible to conscious awareness, allowing suggestions to be enacted involuntarily by lower-level cognitive subsystems24. If the proposed digital artwork were to induce true dissociation, it would require actively bypassing the user's conscious executive function, a claim that is unsupported by visual graphics alone.

Sociocognitive and expectancy accounts reject the altered state hypothesis entirely. These theories argue that hypnotic behavior is a mundane social interaction driven heavily by response expectancy, motivation, and demand characteristics. Participants actively, though perhaps unconsciously, enact the role of a hypnotized person based on their cultural understanding and beliefs about the situational context23. If an altered-state label were applied to the artwork, the sociocognitive theory predicts that highly suggestible visitors would alter their reported experience merely because they expect the artwork to possess hypnotic qualities, operating entirely independently of the actual geometric stimuli presented to them.

Phenomenological control, often referred to as cold control theory, advances a metacognitive framework that bridges previous theoretical divides. It posits that individuals possess varying innate trait capacities to alter their subjective experience to meet specific goals. In cold control, voluntary acts are experienced as involuntary because the individual successfully renders themselves unaware of their own higher-order intentions to comply with a suggestion14. Within this framework, hypnosis is viewed merely as one cultural context that utilizes phenomenological control. This implies that visitors to the platform could genuinely experience visual distortions or profound emotional shifts without requiring a traditional hypnotic induction, provided the contextual expectancies surrounding the digital interaction are calibrated correctly1.

Controlled Studies Isolating Stimuli and Expectancy

Evaluating the efficacy of visual patterns, verbal suggestion, and immersive presentation requires analyzing controlled studies that isolate these variables across diverse populations. The evidence indicates a stark operational difference between visual distraction and hypnotic suggestion.

Studies exploring virtual reality analgesia compared to hypnotic analgesia highlight these distinct mechanisms. A randomized controlled trial tested the additive analgesic efficacy of combining hypnotic analgesia with virtual reality pain distraction on healthy volunteers experiencing induced thermal pain. The data revealed that while the combination of hypnosis and virtual reality was more effective than virtual reality alone, the mechanisms of action differed. Virtual reality relies on a bottom-up multisensory distraction pathway, capturing attentional resources to modulate the pain matrix, whereas hypnosis utilizes top-down executive modulation, heavily dependent on the participant's innate hypnotizability28. This indicates that immersive visual graphics act primarily as a distraction rather than an induction of a trance state.

Neuroimaging studies examining highly hypnotizable subjects under controlled conditions provide further clarity. Functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis of healthy individuals identified specific connectivity changes during hypnosis, including decreased default mode network activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and increased functional connectivity between the executive control network and the salience network. However, these changes were evoked using standard pre-recorded auditory instructions in pre-screened highly hypnotizable populations, lacking specific isolation of abstract visual graphics as the primary induction mechanism11.

Similarly, positron emission tomography scanning has demonstrated that hypnotic suggestion can modulate visual cortical processing. When highly hypnotizable subjects were instructed to perceive grayscale patterns as colored, the classic color area in the fusiform gyrus exhibited activation comparable to true color perception. Crucially, this top-down sensory processing alteration required explicit verbal suggestion and a highly susceptible population, indicating that the visual stimulus itself was subservient to the hypnotic instruction12. In contrast, eye-tracking studies on the perception of digital abstract art among unscreened populations reveal that both novices and experts rely on subjective visual exploration strategies that override strict geometric rules, emphasizing that abstract patterns invite conscious interpretation rather than involuntary cognitive override34. Historically, the hypnotic spiral and related visual fixation devices were theorized to induce hypnosis by causing eye muscle fatigue. Contemporary empirical consensus rejects this bottom-up biological determinism, recognizing visual fixation merely as a technique to focus attention and limit peripheral distraction, not as a direct trigger for dissociation36.

Comparison of Four Pivotal Study Designs

The following data structure compares four key experimental designs to illuminate the limitations of transferring clinical neuroimaging to browser-based interactive art.

 

Audit of the Inference Chain

The theoretical foundation of the artwork relies on an inference chain linking moving geometric patterns to eventual conceptual shifts. An audit of the sequence "moving pattern → neural response → hypnosis → suggestibility → changed belief" reveals varying levels of evidentiary support and significant untested assumptions.

The connection from moving pattern to neural response is an EMPIRICAL FINDING. Direct evidence establishes that viewing geometric patterns and text elicits specific, measurable neural activity. Changes in perceived meaning and color correlate with activation in the ventral occipital cortex and the fusiform gyrus12. Furthermore, event-related potential studies confirm that suggestions related to visual occlusion affect later stages of conscious visual perception while leaving early sensory processing mechanisms intact38.

The transition from neural response to hypnosis is an area of THEORY/INTERPRETATION. Historically, prolonged visual fixation on moving patterns was believed to induce eye fatigue and subsequent biological trance36. Modern evidence rejects this hypothesis. Visual fixation aids in narrowing attention, but does not autonomously bypass cognition. Employing reverse inference—assuming that because hypnosis alters connectivity in the default mode network, any visual pattern that also alters this network thereby induces hypnosis—constitutes a logical fallacy11. Attentional capture is distinct from hypnotic induction.

The link between hypnosis and suggestibility is an EMPIRICAL FINDING. Hypnotizability represents a stable psychological trait that remains remarkably consistent throughout adulthood, demonstrating high test-retest reliability over decades11. The state of hypnosis enhances the expression of this trait, but the visual stimulus of the artwork does not manufacture suggestibility in a user who lacks the innate disposition.

The final transition from suggestibility to a changed belief represents CLIENT-SUPPLIED CONTEXT and an ORIGINAL PROPOSAL. The platform's premise that editing a governing sentence transforms a rigidly held belief acts as a powerful aesthetic metaphor for indoctrination. However, extrapolating group averages of phenomenological control to predict that an individual visitor will experience a permanent, involuntary belief change following a short-term browser interaction is an untested step lacking empirical validation1.

Individual Differences and Participant Preferences

Understanding visitor experience requires measuring enjoyment, absorption, and control without labeling the participant as hypnotized, thereby avoiding the creation of an unvalidated consumer susceptibility quiz. Several nonclinical psychometric instruments exist to assess these individual differences effectively.

The Tellegen Absorption Scale operates as a widely recognized metric for evaluating an individual's disposition to become completely immersed in sensory and imaginative experiences15. Brief, adapted subsets of this scale can measure aesthetic fascination without requiring a clinical environment. For evaluating top-down subjective reality construction outside the realm of formal hypnosis, the Phenomenological Control Scale is highly effective. By intentionally stripping the word hypnosis from the testing language, it accurately measures a participant's capacity for imaginative suggestion in normal psychological contexts2.

To measure the sense of agency seamlessly during interactions, paradigms tracking intentional binding can be implemented directly within the user interface. When a user presses the edit button to initiate the visual transformation of the geometry, the system can prompt a sub-second interval estimation. High intentional binding, indicating a strong implicit sense of authorship and control, occurs when the user perceives the interval between their action and the visual consequence as shorter than reality6. This provides a continuous, non-intrusive measure of cognitive control that does not rely on self-reported questionnaires.

Clinical Outcomes and Transfer Limits

Reviewing positive clinical outcomes serves exclusively to understand the functional components of immersion and suggestion, establishing firm transfer limits between medical treatments and browser-based interactions. Hypnosis effectively modulates acute and chronic pain, leveraging alterations in the executive control network to diminish sensory unpleasantness11. Virtual reality acts as a potent nonpharmacological analgesic by flooding the visual and auditory systems, restricting the attentional bandwidth available for nociceptive processing28.

Transferring these clinical results to an unmonitored digital artwork without acknowledging missing safety and environmental variables is fundamentally unscientific. Clinical hypnosis mandates a trained professional to perform psychosocial assessments, manage abreactions, and monitor psychological distress18. A browser rendering geometry via PHP and WebGL possesses none of these safeguards. When clinical interventions combine relaxation, mindfulness, and cognitive-behavioral skills with formal hypnosis, isolating the specific driver of the behavioral change becomes difficult16. Therefore, the digital platform must strictly separate its aesthetic goals from any implication of clinical therapeutic relief.

Furthermore, dynamic patterned content, including still optical artwork and moving lines, presents serious accessibility and photosensitivity risks. According to the WCAG 2.3.1 standards, web pages must strictly avoid content that flashes more than three times within any one-second period to prevent triggering visually induced seizures9. The client-supplied baseline establishing a thirty-minute expiry for motion consent without interaction represents a vital architectural safeguard, preventing indefinite exposure to patterned graphics across background browser tabs.

Evaluation of Lexicon and Claim Formulations

The terminology used to describe the artwork must retain intrigue without venturing into unmeasured biological or therapeutic claims. An evaluation of the proposed lexicon highlights which phrases are justified by the evidence base.

The phrases guided attention, self-directed exploration, and aesthetic fascination are fully justified by existing literature on visual meaning maps, user control in human-computer interaction, and aesthetic perception3. These terms accurately reflect the active cognitive processing occurring during the interaction.

Describing the experience as a hypnotic aesthetic is acceptable only if framed explicitly as an artistic motif referencing the historical visual language of mesmerism, rather than a description of the user's neurological state36. Using the word mesmerizing is linguistically permissible as ordinary descriptive language denoting intense captivation, provided it is decoupled from clinical claims2.

Conversely, marketing the interaction as a hypnosis experience, or employing phrases such as bypassing the critical mind, reprogramming the subconscious, or guaranteeing trance states, is scientifically invalid for a public artwork. Such fixed-frequency brain-state promises constitute marketing fabrications common in unregulated lay hypnotism and violate the established boundaries of sociocognitive and neurobiological evidence18.

Evidence Matrix: Central Claims

The following structured matrix evaluates the strength and underlying rationale of eight central claims concerning the intersection of visual geometry, hypnosis, and cognitive control.

 

Claim Ladder: Validated versus Unestablished Descriptions

To maintain rigorous scientific integrity, the public documentation and interface copywriting must align with a structured claim ladder.

The first level represents current evidence that is safe to claim immediately. Descriptions such as guided attention, narrative transportation, and self-directed exploration are heavily supported by baseline human-computer interaction and visual cognition literature3.

The second level encompasses claims requiring in-browser psychometrics, making them plausible but dependent on implementation. Describing the experience as producing immersive flow, triggering intentional binding, or tracking agency requires the site to implement temporal tracking of user edits and brief post-interaction absorption questionnaires5.

The third level details claims requiring external validation, which the platform must not claim under the current architecture. Asserting that the artwork leverages phenomenological control or acts as an active hypnotic aesthetic requires the baseline measurement of user traits prior to engagement to prove the digital artwork specifically triggered the altered response, independent of baseline variance2.

The fourth level includes concepts that are scientifically invalid for art and must never be claimed. Statements implying the system bypasses the critical mind, reprograms the subconscious, guarantees a trance, or alters brain waves are unsupported by the literature and pose severe ethical liabilities18.

Original Experience Concepts

To ensure the interactive artwork is genuinely provocative, understandable, and leverages cognitive science without making inappropriate medical claims, three original nonclinical experience concepts with measurable outcomes are proposed.

The first concept, Semantic Gravity, focuses on the tension between abstract geometry and readable text. By integrating the governing sentence directly into the three-dimensional structures of the Monolith or Chorus, the artwork exploits the cognitive principle that meaning maps drive visual attention more powerfully than geometric complexity3. The measurable outcome utilizes cursor-tracking as a proxy for ocular gaze to determine whether visitors dwell significantly longer on the readable text nodes than on the highly complex geometric intersections. A static HTML text overlay serves as the fallback alternative.

The second concept, the Agency Delay, provides a direct test of intentional binding. When a visitor engages the edit button to alter the doctrine, the system introduces a minute, variable sub-second delay before the visual rendering of the Unraveling begins. Following the visual shift, the interface presents a single sliding scale asking the user to rate how closely their action caused the visual change. This implicitly tests the participant's sense of agency; a strong sense of authorship will correlate with a failure to perceive the temporal delay, confirming a high degree of cognitive immersion13. The alternative is a text-only branching narrative with immediate rendering.

The third concept, Absorption Escalation, maps the principles of the psychological flow state onto the interactive geometry. The Chorus state, characterized by distinct interconnected forms, requires continuous, rhythmic cursor or keyboard input from the user to maintain its equilibrium, mirroring the specific skill-challenge balance requisite for entering flow5. The measurable outcome involves monitoring interaction frequency and session duration, followed by a brief adaptation of the Dispositional Flow Scale asking if the user lost track of time. A static gallery of user-generated structures serves as the non-interactive alternative.

Researcher-Led Pathway for Formal Study

Should the creators aim to ascertain whether the digital platform facilitates genuine phenomenological control or verifiable hypnotic responses, an ethically rigorous, researcher-led pathway must be implemented. This protocol exists strictly outside the purview of ordinary website visitors.

The process mandates securing approval from an Institutional Review Board detailing data anonymization and psychological risk protocols. The study requires clinical supervision, partnering with a licensed psychological researcher affiliated with a body such as the International Society for Hypnosis18. Participants must undergo baseline screening in a controlled laboratory setting, utilizing the Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability and the Phenomenological Control Scale7. To determine neurological shifts, researchers could deploy functional magnetic resonance imaging to replicate resting-state parameters, measuring specific connectivity across the executive control and default mode networks while the participant interacts with the digital canvas11. Explicit written informed consent must state that the user is participating in an induction experiment, with immediate opt-out safeguards firmly in place.

Compact Research Questions for the Platform

To bridge the experimental digital arts with cognitive science effectively, the following research questions are proposed specifically for the platform's visual and textual mechanics. Does integrating readable meaning, in the form of a governing doctrine, alter the duration of aesthetic fascination when compared against equivalent, meaningless abstract 3D shapes? Furthermore, does the frequency and degree of visitor-directed changes via the edit button alter the implicit sense of agency independently of the technological immersion provided by optional WebXR rendering? Finally, do highly absorptive individuals, as measured by nonclinical subsets of the Tellegen Absorption Scale, interpret the openly fictional indoctrination premise as a significantly deeper emotional state compared to their low-absorption counterparts?

What This Research Would Change in the Experience

A critical requirement is to determine what empirical finding would transition the conclusion from affirming fascination and authorship to justifying a formal hypnosis-related investigation. The current evidence firmly supports fascination and authorship. The artwork relies on interactive geometry and semantic meaning, seamlessly engaging visual attention and fostering a sense of agency through intentional binding. There is zero empirical neurobiological evidence that a browser-based 3D scene inherently induces the precise neurological state of clinical hypnosis, which requires specific default mode network deactivation11.

The transition to a hypnosis-related investigation would be justified only if the platform implements the Phenomenological Control Scale as an optional external survey, and subsequent analytics reveal that users scoring high on trait phenomenological control report sustained, involuntary perceptual alterations—such as hallucinating colors in grayscale textures or feeling literal physical immobility while viewing the Monolith—that are specifically triggered by the site's textual prompts1.

Strategic Implementation and Feature Validation

 

Glossary of Key Terms

 

Works cited

1. Teaching: Phenomenological Control—What Is Reality, Really?, https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/teaching-current-directions-phenomenological-control

2. The Phenomenological Control Scale: Measuring the Capacity for, https://online.ucpress.edu/collabra/article/7/1/29542/118986/The-Phenomenological-Control-Scale-Measuring-the

3. Visual Attention Drawn to Meaning, Not What Stands Out \- UC Davis, https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/visual-attention-drawn-meaning-not-what-stands-out

4. Transportation Theory \- iResearchNet \- Communication, https://communication.iresearchnet.com/exposure-to-communication-content/transportation-theory/

5. Trait Absorption: The Hidden Driver of Deep Work and Distraction, https://personalityhq.com/article/trait-absorption-deep-work-distraction

6. (PDF) Intentional binding coincides with explicit sense of agency, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329105208\_Intentional\_binding\_coincides\_with\_explicit\_sense\_of\_agency

7. The phenomenological control scale: measuring the capacity for, https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/journal\_contribution/The\_phenomenological\_control\_scale\_measuring\_the\_capacity\_for\_creating\_illusory\_nonvolition\_hallucination\_and\_delusion/23485124

8. Phenomenological Control: New Research on Hypnosis, https://www.cosmic-pancakes.com/blog/pheno-control

9. Testing Methods: Three Flashes or Below Threshold \- Dennis Deacon, https://www.dennisdeacon.com/accessibility/testing-methods-three-flashes-or-below-threshold/

10. WCAG 2.1 \- SC 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold, https://www.boia.org/wcag2/cp/2.3.1

11. Brain Activity and Functional Connectivity Associated with Hypnosis, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6248753/

12. Hypnotic Visual Illusion Alters Color Processing in the Brain, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12408607\_Hypnotic\_Visual\_Illusion\_Alters\_Color\_Processing\_in\_the\_Brain

13. Aalborg Universitet Sense of Agency and User Experience: Is There, https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/470542333/Bergstroem2022TOCHI.pdf

14. Predictive processing and phenomenological control \- OSF, https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/rjn3k\_v1

15. Immersion in altered experience: An investigation of the relationship, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5358520/

16. Increased absorption in autonomous sensory meridian response, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7032055/

17. Personality Characteristics Associated With People Who Frequently, https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2585\&context=etd

18. https://www.ishhypnosis.org/what-is-hypnosis/

19. Neuro-Hypnotism: Prospects for Hypnosis and Neuroscience \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3528837/

20. What's Beyond Presence? Dimensionality, Control, and Information, https://direct.mit.edu/pvar/article/doi/10.1162/PRES.a.418/134643/What-s-Beyond-Presence-Dimensionality-Control-and

21. Intentional binding decreases during learning: Implications for sense, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12901642/

22. The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140386/

23. Hypnotic suggestibility as a moderator of treatment response in mild, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2026.1847384/full

24. The neodissociation model of response to suggestion. Note that in, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-neodissociation-model-of-response-to-suggestion-Note-that-in-the-full-model\_fig1\_13768714

25. Hypnosis at the Crossroads: A Primer of the Past and Visions ... \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12233205/

26. 1 Evaluating the Impact of Hypnotic Suggestion on Implicit Biases, https://figshare.mq.edu.au/ndownloader/files/37857240

27. Controlling Phenomenology by Being Unaware of Intentions, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/qualitative-consciousness/controlling-phenomenology-by-being-unaware-of-intentions/BB5666A46559276DF538F0BBC2FC5336

28. Hypnotic Enhancement of Virtual Reality Distraction Analgesia, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141382/

29. Comparison of Experimental Pain Modulation by Hypnosis, Virtual, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12599604/

30. Virtual reality and pain management: current trends and future, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138477/

31. Brain Activity and Functional Connectivity Associated with Hypnosis, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27469596/

32. \[PDF\] Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain., https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Hypnotic-visual-illusion-alters-color-processing-in-Kosslyn-Thompson/46f05ac2e9a40233578ddb1d9c10a0e48994397d

33. PDF, https://www.nips.ac.jp/fmritms/publications/2004/Morita2004.pdf

34. An Eye Tracking Study on Symmetry and Golden Ratio in Abstract Art, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/16/9/1168

35. Visual Journeys: Eye Tracking and Abstract Art Perception, https://www.realeye.io/blog/post/visual-journeys-eye-tracking-and-abstract-art-perception

36. Hetero Hypnosis: A Practical Guide | PDF \- Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/97164016/Hetero-Hypnosis

37. Modern Hypnosis: Theory and Practice 0960798404, 9780960798407, https://dokumen.pub/modern-hypnosis-theory-and-practice-0960798404-9780960798407.html

38. The Power of mind: Blocking visual perception by hypnosis \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5501776/

39. TELLEGEN ABSORPTION SCALE (TAS) Definition & Meaning, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/trm/tellegen-absorption-scale-tas/

40. Eye Movement Tracking & Visual Attention | Research \- Labvanced, https://www.labvanced.com/content/research/en/blog/2022-07-eye-tracking-for-visual-attention/

41. 5 Myths About Hypnosis | New Empowered You, https://www.new-empowered-you.com/5-myths-about-hypnosis/

42. Hypnosis Associated with 3D Immersive Virtual Reality Technology, https://www.dovepress.com/article/download/53945

43. Sense of Agency for Mental Actions: Insights from a Belief-Based, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.30.428924v1.full-text

44. CARS 120: Exploring Hypnosis in Comparison to Psych Experiments, https://medicalschoolhq.net/cars-120-exploring-hypnosis-in-comparison-to-psych-experiments/