The Architecture and Implications of the Bare JavaScript Runtime: A Paradigm Shift in Embedded and Peer-to-Peer Computing

Full report

On this page

The Historical Evolution of JavaScript Execution Environments

The trajectory of JavaScript execution architectures has undergone a series of profound tectonic shifts over the past three decades. The language originated in 1995 when Brendan Eich created a rudimentary interpreter for the Netscape Navigator web browser, a foundational engine that eventually evolved into Mozilla’s SpiderMonkey.1 For over a decade, JavaScript remained firmly confined to client-side scripting, severely limited by the performance constraints of basic tree-walking interpreters.1 The landscape was permanently altered in 2008 when Google introduced the Chrome browser, featuring the V8 JavaScript engine.1 V8 abandoned traditional interpretation in favor of Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, inline caching, hidden classes, and generational garbage collection, sparking an intense performance arms race among browser vendors.1 Apple swiftly followed by releasing the JIT-enabled Nitro engine for Safari, achieving a thirty percent performance increase over its predecessors.1 However, the most consequential architectural shift occurred in 2009 with the creation of Node.js. Node.js liberated JavaScript from the browser by wrapping the high-performance V8 engine with libuv, a powerful cross-platform C library designed to handle asynchronous I/O operations.2 This architecture introduced a single-threaded, non-blocking, event-driven paradigm that fundamentally revolutionized backend web development, allowing applications to handle thousands of concurrent network connections efficiently.2 Over time, the server-side runtime ecosystem diversified to address specific operational constraints. Modern runtimes such as Deno and Bun emerged to refine the developer experience, introducing native TypeScript support, alternative engine architectures (such as Bun’s utilization of Apple's JavaScriptCore), and memory-safe implementation languages like Rust and Zig.5 Simultaneously, cloud providers began developing specialized runtimes to optimize their proprietary infrastructure. Amazon Web Services (AWS) engineered the Low Latency Runtime (LLRT), which utilizes the lightweight QuickJS engine embedded within Rust and the Tokio event loop to achieve up to ten times faster startup speeds and lower cold-start latency for Serverless Lambda functions compared to standard Node.js environments.9 Despite these remarkable advancements, the overarching design philosophy of mainstream JavaScript runtimes has consistently gravitated toward centralization and monolithic feature sets. Standard libraries have expanded exponentially, tightly coupling the core language execution with high-level networking, file system management, and cryptographic APIs.12 This monolithic approach introduces what systems engineers describe as "upgrade anxiety." When developers are forced to update the runtime binary to patch a core V8 engine vulnerability, they must simultaneously adopt sweeping changes to the bundled standard library, which frequently breaks legacy application logic.12 Furthermore, while Node.js, Deno, and Bun excel in highly provisioned cloud environments, their massive binary footprints and architectural assumptions regarding host operating systems render them largely unsuitable for ubiquitous deployment across constrained environments. Devices such as mobile phones, embedded microcontrollers, and localized Internet of Things (IoT) hardware lack the vast memory and CPU resources necessary to sustain these heavy runtimes.14 In direct response to these structural limitations, the Holepunch development team engineered Bare—a minimalist, highly modular JavaScript runtime designed explicitly for ubiquitous cross-device deployment and decentralized, peer-to-peer (P2P) computing networks.12 By completely stripping away the monolithic standard library and abstracting the underlying execution engine via a stable Application Binary Interface (ABI), Bare fundamentally reimagines the relationship between the runtime environment, the application code, and the underlying network topology.16

The Triad of Execution: Restructuring Engine, I/O, and Bindings

The Bare runtime represents a deliberate architectural homecoming to the original asynchronous, event-driven vision of early Node.js, but executed with an uncompromising adherence to minimalism and modularity.14 To operate successfully outside the confines of a web browser, modern JavaScript runtimes require three foundational components: an execution engine to parse and interpret ECMAScript, an asynchronous I/O library to manage hardware interactions and the event loop, and a sophisticated C++ binding layer that seamlessly bridges the two environments.2 Bare utilizes libuv for platform I/O operations, deliberately maintaining architectural parity with Node.js in its handling of network sockets, file system descriptors, and background thread pooling.16 The operating system inherently provides services allowing applications to register resources awaiting asynchronous data; on Unix-like systems, this is achieved via epoll or select system calls that monitor file descriptors.17 libuv serves as the critical abstraction layer over these OS-specific mechanics, providing a uniform interface across Linux, macOS, Android, iOS, and Windows.17 When an asynchronous operation is initiated in JavaScript, it is delegated to libuv, which may execute the task in a background C++ thread pool to prevent blocking the main V8 execution thread.2 Where Bare diverges significantly from its predecessors is within the critical binding layer. Traditional runtimes tightly couple their execution flow directly to the V8 engine’s rapidly evolving and highly complex C++ API. Bare, conversely, introduces libjs (developed and maintained by Holepunch), a low-level abstraction layer that provides bindings to the underlying JavaScript engine in a completely engine-agnostic manner.16 This engine abstraction establishes a stable C ABI. Therefore, the runtime itself, alongside any compiled native C/C++ addons, interacts exclusively with libjs rather than grappling with the specific memory management idiosyncrasies of V8, QuickJS, or JavaScriptCore.16 To further facilitate safe and efficient interaction with this low-level API, the Holepunch team also developed libjstl, a C++ template library for libjs designed to allow developers to interact with the engine without writing excessively verbose raw C code.20 The synergistic utilization of libuv alongside the libjs abstraction layer allows userland module authors to implement native hardware addons that can compile and run flawlessly on any operating system supported by libuv and any JavaScript engine that successfully implements the libjs ABI.12 This architectural triad effectively insulates user-space code from upstream engine volatility, fundamentally solving the widespread issue of Application Binary Interface breakage that plagues Node.js native module ecosystems during major engine version upgrades.16

Deep Dive: The Mechanics of Engine Embedding and Event Loops

To fully comprehend the structural engineering advantages of the Bare runtime and its libjs abstraction, one must rigorously examine the underlying mechanics of how C++ code interacts with a JavaScript execution context and manages the asynchronous event loop. Educational projects, such as Erick Wendel’s custom runtime tutorial (often referred to as the CapivaraBR project or "myownnode"), provide an invaluable structural breakdown of how runtimes map these complex internal interactions from scratch.3

The Anatomy of V8 Embedding

When a runtime boots utilizing the V8 engine, it must meticulously establish a secure, isolated execution environment using specific C++ abstractions. The highest level of this hierarchy is the Isolate (v8::Isolate). An Isolate is an independent instance of the V8 virtual machine, containing its own heap memory and an isolated garbage collector.4 Multiple Isolates can theoretically operate in parallel across different operating system threads without locking each other; however, a single Isolate is strictly bound to a single thread of execution.22 Within this Isolate, developers must instantiate a Context (v8::Context). A Context acts as a sandboxed execution environment, allowing completely unrelated JavaScript applications to run within the same V8 virtual machine instance without cross-polluting global objects or shared variables.4 Memory management presents the most significant hurdle when bridging C++ and JavaScript. Because the V8 garbage collector continuously moves objects within the heap to prevent memory fragmentation, C++ code cannot safely hold raw memory pointers to JavaScript objects.22 Instead, V8 enforces the use of Local handles (v8::Local), which are pointers to objects managed by a HandleScope.22 A HandleScope acts as a container for any number of local handles. When a C++ function finishes executing, the HandleScope is destroyed, signaling to the V8 garbage collector that all associated JavaScript handles are no longer required and their memory can be safely reclaimed.22 Alternative engines employ similar but distinctly implemented memory protection mechanisms. For example, when embedding Mozilla's SpiderMonkey engine, developers utilize a JSContext which maps one-to-one with a JSRuntime.23 Instead of HandleScopes, SpiderMonkey requires precise rooting via JS::Rooted to explicitly protect local variables on the C++ stack from being swept or relocated during garbage collection cycles.23 SpiderMonkey also utilizes a JS::Handle class, which acts as a protected pointer (JSObject) guaranteeing that the underlying object is shielded from premature collection.23 To assist the garbage collector in understanding memory pressure, SpiderMonkey requires developers to explicitly declare the exact amount of native memory associated with a specific JavaScript object using JS::AddAssociatedMemory(), a call that must be meticulously matched with JS::RemoveAssociatedMemory() upon destruction.24 To expose native C++ functions to the JavaScript environment, V8 utilizes templates. A FunctionTemplate (v8::FunctionTemplate) serves as the blueprint for a single function. The runtime creates a JavaScript instance of this template by calling the GetFunction method from within the specific Context where the function is meant to reside.22 Developers associate a C++ callback with the FunctionTemplate, which V8 automatically invokes whenever the corresponding JavaScript function is called.22 Similarly, an ObjectTemplate configures the properties and prototype chains of complex objects.22 Developers frequently utilize wrapper libraries, such as v8pp, to abstract this extensive boilerplate, allowing them to bind standard C++ free functions, lambdas, and class instance members directly to V8 using streamlined syntax like v8pp::wrap\_function(isolate, "f", \&f).26

Event Loop Mapping and Asynchronous Callbacks

JavaScript is inherently synchronous in its execution model, yet it relies heavily on asynchronous behavior for non-blocking I/O. This paradox is resolved by delegating blocking operations to the C++ layer via libuv.2 When a developer invokes an asynchronous operation—such as a custom setTimeout implementation in a barebones runtime—a highly choreographed sequence of cross-language events is initiated.21

1. The JavaScript engine encounters a global function mapped to a native C++ method via a v8::FunctionTemplate.4
2. The runtime extracts the JavaScript callback function passed as an argument. To prevent the V8 garbage collector from destroying this callback while the asynchronous operation is pending in the background, the C++ layer must store the callback persistently. This is typically achieved by casting the local handle to a v8::Persistent or v8::Global handle, which survives beyond the immediate HandleScope.21
3. The runtime instantiates a C++ data structure to hold this persistent callback reference alongside any necessary state variables, and then invokes a libuv function, such as uv\_timer\_start (for timeouts) or uv\_queue\_work (for heavy CPU or I/O tasks).17
4. If the task involves heavy file reading or DNS resolution, libuv immediately delegates the operation to its internal C++ worker thread pool, bypassing the main JavaScript thread entirely.2 Meanwhile, the main uv\_loop\_t continues executing, continuously listening for other system events.17
5. Once the background thread completes its task, or the operating system signals that the timer has expired, libuv pushes an event notification into its completion queue.2
6. During the subsequent "tick" of the event loop, the main thread processes this completion queue. The runtime retrieves the persisted V8 JavaScript function from the C++ struct, converts any resulting C++ data back into V8 primitive types, and invokes the callback, passing the data back into the active V8 Context for execution.21

Bare utilizes this exact architectural flow to achieve non-blocking concurrency. However, by strictly abstracting the V8 interactions behind libjs, Bare completely shields native module developers from writing manual v8::FunctionTemplate or HandleScope boilerplate. Instead, module authors write against a highly stable C interface. libjs seamlessly translates these C calls into the underlying engine's specific API requirements—whether that translates to V8 Handles underneath, or QuickJS JSValue structs.16

The Rust Alternative: Deno Core and Tokio

It is highly illustrative to contrast this C++ based architecture with the methodology employed by Rust-based runtimes like Deno. Rather than writing raw C++ bindings, Deno abstracts V8 through a Rust crate named deno\_core.5 deno\_core encapsulates a V8 Isolate within a JsRuntime struct and utilizes the tokio asynchronous runtime to function as the event loop, replacing libuv entirely.5 Tokio is responsible for interacting with operating system abstractions like network sockets and file systems. The combination of deno\_core and tokio allows JavaScript Promises to be mapped effortlessly onto Rust Futures.29 However, the embedding application retains the responsibility of manually driving this execution; developers must explicitly execute the JsRuntime::run\_event\_loop method within the context of the Rust future executor to process the event queue.5 Rust functions are registered into the JavaScript environment using the deno\_core::extension\! macro, providing a safer, memory-managed approach to engine binding compared to raw C++.5 This deno\_core architecture is so robust that other runtime bundlers and plugins frequently embed it into their own Rust binaries to execute JavaScript extensions securely.30

The "Everything is a Module" Philosophy

Perhaps the most defining and consequential characteristic of Bare is its total rejection of the monolithic standard library. Bare ships with absolutely no built-in modules beyond the fundamental ECMAScript APIs and a core global Bare namespace.12 In a traditional Node.js environment, functions for file system access (fs), HTTP networking (http), and cryptography (crypto) are bundled directly into the heavy runtime binary. Bare shifts this entire ecosystem entirely into userland. If an application developer requires file system access, they must explicitly install the bare-fs module via a package manager.12 If HTTP routing is required, bare-http1 must be installed.12 This hyper-modular approach yields profound technical, operational, and security advantages:

1. Eradication of Upgrade Anxiety: Because the standard library is completely decoupled from the runtime executable, engineering teams can upgrade the Bare binary to receive critical V8 security patches or performance optimizations without inadvertently breaking complex application logic that depends on specific legacy fs or http behaviors.12 Library dependencies can be refactored and gracefully upgraded strictly in sync with the application's unique lifecycle.12
2. Minimized Attack Surface: By only loading the precise primitives required for execution, Bare significantly reduces the attack surface of the application. If a decentralized application does not require HTTP networking, the HTTP parsing logic simply does not exist within the application’s memory space, eliminating entire vectors of potential exploitation.14
3. Dramatically Reduced Binary Footprint: Without the burden of a massive standard library, the bare-runtime binary is exceptionally small.18 This facilitates rapid distribution over networks and enables effortless embedding within native mobile applications or highly constrained IoT devices.12

Interoperability and Advanced Module Resolution

Despite its minimalist core, Bare integrates a highly sophisticated module resolution algorithm capable of seamless bidirectional interoperability between CommonJS (CJS) and ECMAScript Modules (ESM).12 The runtime natively supports importing CJS modules directly from ESM contexts, and require()-ing ESM modules from CJS contexts, utilizing the exact same underlying resolution logic.12 This structural decision ensures that the vast, pre-existing ecosystem of npm packages remains largely compatible with Bare, provided those packages do not rely on hardcoded Node.js specific global variables. The Holepunch team maintains bare-module, a dedicated repository that handles this logic.32 This module system utilizes distinct module IDs for lookups and implements specific handlers like require.addon() for seamlessly loading native C++ bindings into the runtime without relying on Node’s legacy binding infrastructure.32 It additionally supports advanced configurations, such as bypassing the module cache via cache: false flags, affording developers granular control over module lifecycle evaluation.32 To further assist with Node.js ecosystem compatibility, the bare-node-runtime package provides polyfills and global mappings (such as unsupported API stubs) to bridge the gap for legacy codebases attempting to transition into the Bare environment.33

Engine Swappability: Execution Strategies and Memory Footprints

Because Bare interfaces with its JavaScript engine exclusively via the libjs abstraction, the runtime possesses a rare and highly powerful capability: true engine swappability.12 By default, Bare compiles against github:holepunchto/libjs, which acts as the stable wrapper for V8.16 However, the runtime can be explicitly configured via CMake options during the build phase (specifically using the BARE\_ENGINE flag) to compile against entirely alternative engines, such as QuickJS (via the libqjs abstraction) or JavaScriptCore.12 This swappability is not merely an academic exercise in architectural flexibility; it represents a fundamental mechanism for advanced hardware targeting. Different JavaScript engines employ vastly different strategies for parsing, compiling, and garbage collection, making them uniquely suitable for different physical deployment targets.

V8: High Throughput and Heavy Constraints

V8, maintained by Google, is ruthlessly optimized for maximum peak throughput and sustained long-running performance.8 It achieves this via a highly complex multi-tiered architecture. JavaScript is initially parsed and executed by the Ignition interpreter, which begins execution rapidly but unoptimized. As code execution continues, the engine profiles the code and identifies "hot" execution paths.8 These hot paths are fed into the TurboFan Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler, which dynamically generates highly optimized machine code tailored to the specific variable types observed during runtime.8 Furthermore, V8 manages memory using a generational, incremental, and concurrent garbage collector. It divides the memory heap into young and old generations, utilizing a highly complex mark-sweep-compact algorithm to pause execution as minimally as possible while reclaiming dead memory across background threads.8 While V8's computational performance is undeniably unparalleled for heavy server workloads, its JIT compilation infrastructure and concurrent garbage collector incur a massive baseline memory footprint. A standard V8 binary can easily consume upwards of 28 MB of disk space and significant baseline RAM before executing a single line of JavaScript.15 For well-provisioned cloud instances, this overhead is entirely negligible; for an embedded microcontroller or a lightweight mobile thread, it is a prohibitive constraint.14

QuickJS: Determinism and Extreme Memory Efficiency

To directly address the extreme limitations of V8 on constrained devices, Bare natively supports QuickJS via the libqjs implementation.34 Authored by Fabrice Bellard, QuickJS is a highly embeddable engine that deliberately sacrifices the peak throughput generated by JIT compilation in favor of extreme memory efficiency and practically instantaneous startup times.35 QuickJS operates strictly as a fast interpreter, completely bypassing complex JIT compilation architectures.11 Despite supporting almost the complete ES2025 specification—including Modules, asynchronous generators, proxies, and BigInt—its entire x86 compiled code footprint for a basic program is approximately 210 to 367 KiB.6 Furthermore, it includes a qjsc compiler, allowing developers to compile JavaScript sources directly into standalone executables with zero external dependencies, or export the bytecode as raw binary JSON for immediate execution.36 More importantly, QuickJS employs a fundamentally different memory management strategy: Reference Counting supplemented by a cycle removal algorithm.36 In a reference counting system (a strategy similarly used in C++ std::shared\_ptr or Rust's Rc), every instantiated object maintains a numerical count of active pointers referencing it. When a variable references the object, the internal JS\_DupValue C function is called, incrementing the reference count.37 When a reference goes out of scope, JS\_FreeValueRT is invoked, decrementing the count.37 When the count reaches exactly zero, the memory is instantly and deterministically freed.37 However, reference counting alone suffers from memory leaks when two isolated objects reference each other, creating an unbreakable cycle where neither count reaches zero.37 QuickJS solves this by implementing a cyclic collection algorithm utilizing a targeted mark-and-sweep approach to periodically identify and eliminate these stranded islands of memory.37 This deterministic memory behavior provides massive advantages for embedded systems. There are no unpredictable, long-running garbage collection pauses typical of V8.36 Developers building Bare applications for strict hardware environments can swap V8 out for QuickJS, ensuring that memory usage remains strictly bounded.12 For ultra-constrained environments, modified forks such as MQuickJS exist. MQuickJS forces a stricter subset of ES5, avoids utilizing the CPU stack for the VM, stores strings entirely in UTF-8, and relies exclusively on a tracing garbage collector to run complex JavaScript programs using as little as 10 KB of RAM, with the entire engine occupying roughly 100 KB of ROM.38

Comparative Architectures in the Embedded Ecosystem

While Bare focuses primarily on V8, QuickJS, and JavaScriptCore, the broader embedded JavaScript engine ecosystem provides essential context regarding the extreme optimization strategies necessary for microcontroller deployment. Understanding these engines highlights precisely why Bare’s swappable architecture is critical for long-term hardware compatibility.

Duktape and JerryScript

Duktape is a deeply embedded ECMAScript engine prioritizing portability and a compact footprint.39 Conforming primarily to ES5.1, Duktape provides highly optimized fast paths for ASCII string operations (avoiding expensive Unicode processing where possible) and dense array numeric indices.39 When accessing array buffers, Duktape avoids coercing numeric indices into strings before attempting a lookup, vastly improving loop performance.40 Furthermore, it stores object properties in a linear key/value list to retain insertion order, only allocating hash lookup tables when an object exceeds 32 properties to save RAM.40 JerryScript, conversely, is designed specifically for the absolute constraints of the Internet of Things (IoT). It is capable of running on ARM Cortex-M4 processors with less than 128 KB of total RAM.41 By compiling the engine using a strict "compact profile" that omits heavy ECMAScript features like RegExp and UTF-16 strings, JerryScript can boot in under 8 KB of RAM.41 The following table demonstrates Duktape's relative Octane Benchmark sub-scores against other engines, illustrating how execution speed varies significantly depending on the specific computational task (higher scores indicate better performance, highest of 10 runs) 42:

Moddable XS and Hermes

The Moddable XS engine pioneers advanced Read-Only Memory (ROM) utilization. During the build process, the XS linker constructs built-ins and preloads complex user modules, saving the resultant state directly into native data flashed into ROM.43 Applications boot instantaneously because large initialization structures are never copied to RAM.43 To conform to JavaScript semantics allowing runtime object modification, XS maintains an initially empty table of aliases in RAM. When an application modifies a ROM object, it is cloned into RAM and inserted into the alias table.43 However, applying the Object.freeze standard JavaScript method to objects physically instructs the XS linker to exclude them from the aliasable index entirely, completely eliminating the 4-byte RAM pointer overhead for that variable.43 This allows complex hardware frameworks to be deployed on an ESP32 microcontroller using partition maps reserving a mere 256 KB of flash storage.45 Moddable also extensively utilizes Compartments—a sandboxing methodology from Secure ECMAScript (SES)—to securely isolate third-party IoT mods, ensuring malicious scripts cannot break out of their designated security rules to access unauthorized hardware.45 Alternatively, Hermes, developed by Facebook, focuses heavily on mobile app latency.47 Rather than optimizing for runtime execution speed, Hermes forces Ahead-Of-Time (AOT) bytecode compilation during the build process.47 This ensures the mobile device does not waste critical CPU cycles and battery life parsing raw JavaScript text at runtime, resulting in vastly superior React Native application startup times.47

By establishing the libjs API, Bare's architecture theoretically allows any of these sophisticated, highly-targeted engines to be incorporated into the runtime in the future, establishing a highly versatile foundation for embedded computing.12

Native Addons and Dynamic Linking Stability

One of the most profound benefits of the libjs abstraction is its impact on native C/C++ addons. Bare fully supports both statically and dynamically linked native addons.16 Due to the ABI stability provided by the intermediate libjs layer, developers can successfully utilize the Node-API (N-API) standard to write cross-platform addons.12 The Holepunch team explicitly engineered the system so that virtually all N-API symbols are available and built directly on top of libjs.12 This presents a monumental paradigm shift in software maintenance overhead. In traditional Node.js environments, a minor upgrade to the underlying V8 engine frequently breaks the binary interface, forcing open-source maintainers to meticulously recompile all C++ native addons via tools like node-gyp. Bare completely circumvents this systemic fragility. An addon compiled against the libjs ABI will continue to execute flawlessly even if the Bare runtime dynamically swaps the underlying V8 engine for QuickJS, or if V8 undergoes a massive internal architectural revision.16 This ensures that hardware drivers, cryptographic libraries, and native file system hooks written in C++ remain universally compatible across runtime versions.

Bare Kit: Mobile Embedding and Concurrency

A core deficiency of Node.js has consistently been its fundamental inability to embed cleanly into native mobile applications. The massive binary size, coupled with the assumption of a host OS environment heavily dependent on accessible environment variables, unrestricted file system access, and virtually unlimited RAM, makes running standard Node.js on highly constrained iOS or Android environments wholly impractical. Bare resolves this limitation directly via the introduction of Bare Kit.12

Mobile Worklets and Inter-Process Communication (IPC)

Bare Kit provides comprehensive bindings specifically designed to embed the Bare runtime directly into native Android and iOS applications.12 It introduces the architectural concept of "Worklets"—which are strictly isolated Bare threads running entirely independently of the mobile application's main User Interface (UI) thread.12 For example, when an engineering team integrates Bare with React Native utilizing the react-native-bare-kit package, developers can programmatically instantiate a Worklet directly from their React code and pass an inline payload of JavaScript for the embedded Bare runtime to execute autonomously in the background.12 To bridge the highly restricted communication gap between the embedded Bare JS runtime and the host mobile OS, Bare Kit exposes a robust Inter-Process Communication (IPC) system.12 This is achieved by serializing messages—often enforcing a strict UTF-8 string encoding via IPC.setEncoding('utf8')—and transmitting them asynchronously between the JavaScript execution context and the native Swift, Kotlin, or Java host contexts using standard event emission protocols (e.g., IPC.on('data') and IPC.write()).12

Advanced Threading Mechanics and Suspension APIs

Beyond mobile integration, Bare provides native support for highly efficient multi-threading. While the standard ECMAScript specification is inherently single-threaded, Bare circumvents this limitation by supporting lightweight threads heavily integrated with SharedArrayBuffer.16 SharedArrayBuffer allows multiple isolated execution threads to read and write to the exact same block of binary memory concurrently, bypassing the expensive serialization overhead typically required for message passing between threads. Crucially, Bare introduces the concept of synchronous joins to its threading model.16 This implementation permits the main execution thread to rapidly spawn an isolated background thread, execute a highly intensive CPU task (such as on-the-fly video re-encoding or complex cryptographic hashing algorithms), and synchronously halt and wait for the background thread's termination without having to architect the program around complex, callback-heavy asynchronous state machines. Furthermore, the core runtime integrates deeply with process lifecycle and suspension APIs, allowing the runtime to elegantly handle OS-level signals (like app backgrounding on mobile devices) using tools like suppressSignals and structured exit codes.18 This precise threading architecture, combined directly with the native mobile IPC, enables developers to write true "write-once-run-anywhere" logic. Complex, proprietary algorithms can be written in a single JavaScript module, executed via the Bare CLI on a standard desktop CPU, and subsequently embedded directly into an iOS application using a Bare Kit worklet without modifying a single line of the underlying business logic.12

Decentralization and The Pear Peer-to-Peer Stack

The technical innovations encapsulated within the Bare runtime—aggressive modularity, engine swappability, embedded stable ABIs, and mobile worklets—are not simply optimizations for standard web servers; they act as the foundational substrate for a much larger operational objective: the total eradication of centralized server infrastructures.12 Bare is fundamentally tethered to the broader Holepunch stack and the Pear Runtime.14 Pear operates as a comprehensive open-source framework designed explicitly to facilitate the creation of serverless, decentralized, peer-to-peer (P2P) applications.12

Overcoming the Client-Server Orthodoxy

In a standard contemporary web application architecture, client software running on browsers or mobile applications connects via HTTP to a centralized server. The server acts as the ultimate arbiter of truth: computing the business logic, querying the database, and returning the structured response. This topology incurs perpetual, escalating cloud hosting costs, creates massive single points of failure, and necessitates that users surrender their private data entirely to third-party corporate entities.14 Bare, operating in tandem with the Pear framework, effectively transforms the end-user's device into both the client and the server simultaneously. Because the Bare runtime can run embedded within a standard mobile phone or desktop application with near-native efficiency, it possesses the capability to execute the heavy backend processing logic directly on the user's localized hardware.14

Direct Data Sharing and Holepunch Network Topology

The complete Pear stack provides the complex network layer mechanisms—such as highly optimized decentralized peer discovery via Distributed Hash Tables (DHTs), sophisticated Network Address Translation (NAT) hole-punching, and secure end-to-end encryption protocols—that allow two isolated instances of the Bare runtime to independently locate and connect to each other directly over the public internet, bypassing firewalls.12 This peer-to-peer architecture enables profound operational capabilities:

1. Zero-Cost Infrastructure: By fundamentally removing the centralized server from the execution flow, development teams are completely absolved of AWS, GCP, or Azure hosting costs. Bandwidth and computational resources are sourced directly and organically from the localized user network.14
2. Absolute Data Privacy: Because the architecture forces data to travel exclusively between verified peers, there is no intermediate corporate server to aggregate, store, index, or mine user communications or metadata.14
3. High-Efficiency Binary Data Streaming: Bare's libuv-backed asynchronous architecture is heavily optimized for extremely fast binary data transmission via custom streams. This enables the creation of decentralized, peer-powered media libraries, hyper-fast live video streaming platforms, and real-time collaborative tools that operate without centralized latency bottlenecks.12 Keet, a flagship P2P application developed internally by the Holepunch team, heavily utilizes this exact Bare architecture for real-time, high-definition video communications.14

Furthermore, the Pear Runtime acts as a deployment container for these Bare applications. It natively handles automatic cryptographic updates via decentralized append-only logs, ensuring that both the proprietary application logic and the underlying Bare runtime binary are kept seamlessly up-to-date across the entire decentralized swarm without ever relying on traditional, centralized app store distribution models.14

Compilation, Tooling, and Package Distribution Strategy

Because Bare is fundamentally engineered as an un-opinionated engine wrapper, the compilation, linking, and customization process is exposed heavily to the engineering teams utilizing it.

The C++ Build System

Bare utilizes a comprehensive CMake build infrastructure, which is intelligently abstracted via a dedicated userland tool called bare-make.48 This tool functions similarly to node-gyp but is built specifically for the intricacies of the Bare ecosystem. It allows developers to programmatically generate, build, and install C++ configurations either via an interactive Command-Line Interface (bare-make generate, bare-make build, bare-make install) or directly via top-level JavaScript API calls (await make.generate()).49 Bare also frequently leverages cmake-fetch for managing external dependencies cleanly within this ecosystem.19 When an engineer compiles the runtime itself from the raw source code, they pass specific command flags to bare-make generate to meticulously tailor the resulting runtime binary:

• BARE\_ENGINE: Specifies the specific GitHub repository of the target engine abstraction (defaulting to github:holepunchto/libjs for V8 implementation).16
• BARE\_PREBUILDS: A configuration toggle to enable downloading pre-built binaries for supported third-party dependencies, drastically accelerating local compilation times.16
• BARE\_MEMORY\_LIMIT: Defines a strict numerical upper bound for the JavaScript heap allocation, preventing the engine from consuming excessive system RAM.16

This degree of granular configurability is critically important for embedded systems engineers who must compile highly static binaries that respect strict, unyielding hardware memory limitations on localized devices.12

Packaging, Optimization, and CLI

Despite its architectural divergence from the Node.js ecosystem, the Holepunch team pragmatically leverages the ubiquitous npm ecosystem for distribution.13 The primary runtime executable can be installed globally onto any machine via a simple npm i \-g bare command.16 However, downloading massive, raw source files and compiling complex C++ binaries locally during an npm install phase is famously error-prone across different operating systems and compiler versions. To systematically circumvent this friction, the Bare team distributes the bare-runtime package utilizing prebuilt binaries securely hosted via GitHub Releases.18 When a user installs the npm package, a sophisticated post-installation script executes to detect the host operating system (macOS, iOS, Linux, Android, or Windows) and the specific CPU architecture (x64, arm64).18 It then dynamically fetches only the precise, minimal binary required from GitHub.18 This highly optimized distribution strategy reduces the total npm package weight dramatically—for example, shrinking a generalized 100MB package down to a localized 20MB payload—allowing the runtime to act as an incredibly lightweight, frictionless dependency inside much larger software applications.50 Once successfully installed, the Bare Command-Line Interface provides a standard suite of flags for rapid execution and debugging. This includes \-e or \--eval for evaluating inline JavaScript scripts, \--print for printing immediate results, \--inspect for activating the V8 inspector protocol for debugging (defaulting to port 9229), and \--expose-gc for manually exposing internal garbage collection APIs to the JavaScript context to assist memory profiling.16

Strategic Implications and the Future of Decentralized Computing

The introduction of the Bare runtime signals a much broader philosophical and technical divergence occurring within the global software engineering community. For over a decade, the prevailing industry paradigm has rigidly dictated that computational complexity and heavy processing strictly belong in centralized cloud environments, while localized user devices serve merely as thin-client rendering engines displaying data. This monolithic model directly birthed the heavy JS runtimes optimized exclusively for horizontal server scaling. Bare directly challenges this ingrained orthodoxy by asserting that modern user hardware—ranging from powerful desktop laptops to incredibly capable multi-core mobile phones—possesses immense, completely underutilized computational capacity.12 By unapologetically prioritizing cross-device embeddability via tools like Bare Kit, introducing stable, unbreaking ABI layers through the libjs abstraction, and actively leveraging highly deterministic, memory-efficient engines like QuickJS, Bare equips developers with the foundational tools to push complex backend logic back to the absolute edge of the network: the user's physical device. When symbiotically paired with the Pear P2P stack and Holepunch's advanced NAT traversal technologies, the implications of the Bare architecture extend far beyond mere application startup speed or memory efficiency. It provides the literal execution engine for the creation of robust, entirely serverless communication networks where bandwidth and complex compute costs are distributed dynamically and equitably across the localized swarm. This entirely bypasses the massive financial hosting tolls and the systemic privacy violations frequently exacted by centralized cloud infrastructure providers.14 As the Internet of Things (IoT) continues to proliferate into every facet of the physical world, and as global concerns regarding corporate data privacy, surveillance, and platform monopolization inevitably escalate, monolithic cloud-first software architectures will face intense technical and ideological scrutiny. The Bare runtime—with its strict adherence to modularity, its unparalleled hardware adaptability across engines, and its foundational integration into decentralized peer-to-peer networking topologies—provides a technically viable, highly efficient, and incredibly disruptive blueprint for the next generation of computing. By guaranteeing that software developers can write highly secure, deeply modular code exactly once and execute it everywhere with near-native performance, Bare is not merely another JavaScript engine wrapper; it is the infrastructural substrate required to build an entirely new, decentralized web topology.

Works cited

1. List of JavaScript engines \- Wikipedia, accessed July 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_JavaScript\_engines
2. Building a JavaScript Runtime from Scratch | PDF | Java Script | Computing \- Scribd, accessed July 1, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/689616726/creating-your-own-js-runtime
3. Recreating Node.js from Scratch \- YouTube, accessed July 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynNDmp7hBdo
4. JavaScript's Asynchronous Execution: V8 and the Event Loop \- DEV Community, accessed July 1, 2026, https://dev.to/\_\_whyd\_rf/javascripts-asynchronous-execution-v8-and-the-event-loop-4if5
5. deno\_core \- crates.io: Rust Package Registry, accessed July 1, 2026, https://crates.io/crates/deno\_core
6. js engine benchmark 2025-7-8 \- DEV Community, accessed July 1, 2026, https://dev.to/ahaoboy/js-engine-benchmark-2025-7-8-163b
7. ahaoboy/js-engine-benchmark \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/ahaoboy/js-engine-benchmark
8. JavaScript Engines Explained—Comparing V8, SpiderMonkey, JavaScriptCore, and More, accessed July 1, 2026, https://frontenddogma.com/posts/2025/javascript-engines-explained/
9. GitHub \- awslabs/llrt: LLRT (Low Latency Runtime) is an experimental, lightweight JavaScript runtime designed to address the growing demand for fast and efficient Serverless applications., accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/awslabs/llrt
10. Using the High-Speed JavaScript Runtime LLRT (Beta) for AWS Lambda | Mamezou Developer Portal \- 豆蔵デベロッパーサイト, accessed July 1, 2026, https://developer.mamezou-tech.com/en/blogs/2024/02/21/aws-lambda-llrt-intro/
11. Unlocking Next-Gen Serverless Performance: A Deep Dive into AWS LLRT, accessed July 1, 2026, https://dev.to/aws-builders/unlocking-next-gen-serverless-performance-a-deep-dive-into-aws-llrt-5f3f
12. Bare | Fast, Lightweight Runtime for Modular JavaScript Apps, accessed July 1, 2026, https://bare.pears.com/
13. Bare: Run JavaScript Everywhere | Hacker News, accessed July 1, 2026, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43558352
14. Introducing Bare: Actually run Javascript Everywhere \- Pears, accessed July 1, 2026, https://pears.com/news/introducing-bare-actually-run-javascript-everywhere/
15. Having used both QuickJS and Duktape, I have to say that QuickJS is a lot better... | Hacker News, accessed July 1, 2026, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31968265
16. GitHub \- holepunchto/bare: Small and modular JavaScript runtime for desktop and mobile, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/bare
17. In node.js and browsers. How does Javascript engine like V8 delegate event loop to libuv, accessed July 1, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/pfjiyt/in\_nodejs\_and\_browsers\_how\_does\_javascript\_engine/
18. GitHub \- holepunchto/bare-runtime: Prebuilt Bare binaries for macOS, iOS, Linux, Android, and Windows, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/bare-runtime
19. GitHub \- holepunchto/libjs: Simple and ABI stable C bindings to V8 built on libuv, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/libjs
20. holepunchto/libjstl: C++ template library for https://github.com/holepunchto/libjs · GitHub \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/libjstl
21. ErickWendel/myownnode: Bun? Deno? Node.js? Creating ... \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/ErickWendel/myownnode
22. Getting started with embedding V8 \- V8 JavaScript engine, accessed July 1, 2026, https://v8.dev/docs/embed
23. Beginner's questions about embedding SpiderMonkey \- Mozilla Discourse, accessed July 1, 2026, https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/beginners-questions-about-embedding-spidermonkey/92996
24. spidermonkey-embedding-examples/docs/Migration Guide.md at esr115 \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/mozilla-spidermonkey/spidermonkey-embedding-examples/blob/esr115/docs/Migration%20Guide.md
25. Bind class instance function to v8::FunctionTemplate \- Stack Overflow, accessed July 1, 2026, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56419664/bind-class-instance-function-to-v8functiontemplate
26. Wrapping C++ code | v8pp \- GitHub Pages, accessed July 1, 2026, http://pmed.github.io/v8pp/wrapping.html
27. How to bind a std::function to JavaScript V8? \- c++ \- Stack Overflow, accessed July 1, 2026, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15731699/how-to-bind-a-stdfunction-to-javascript-v8
28. GitHub \- pmed/v8pp: Bind C++ functions and classes into V8 JavaScript engine, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/pmed/v8pp
29. Roll your own JavaScript runtime | Deno, accessed July 1, 2026, https://deno.com/blog/roll-your-own-javascript-runtime
30. Supercharge your app with user extensions using Deno runtime \- Secutils.dev, accessed July 1, 2026, https://secutils.dev/docs/blog/rust-application-with-js-extensions
31. How to use Deno as a Rust crate but with the complete Node & Deno standard library, module resolution, commonjs support, etc? \#21968 \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/denoland/deno/discussions/21968
32. holepunchto/bare-module: Module support for JavaScript \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/bare-module
33. holepunchto/bare-node-runtime: Compatibility layer for Node.js builtins and globals in Bare, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/bare-node-runtime
34. holepunchto/libqjs: ABI compatible replacement for https://github.com/holepunchto/libjs built on QuickJS · GitHub \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/libqjs
35. Modern JavaScript in NGINX: QuickJS Engine Support for njs, accessed July 1, 2026, https://blog.nginx.org/blog/quickjs-engine-support-for-njs
36. QuickJS Javascript Engine \- Fabrice Bellard, accessed July 1, 2026, https://bellard.org/quickjs/quickjs.html
37. Anatomy of QuickJS garbage collection algorithm | by Landerl Young \- Medium, accessed July 1, 2026, https://medium.com/@landerlyoung/anatomy-of-quickjs-garbage-collection-algorithm-fc02f6813ba1
38. bellard/mquickjs: Public repository of the Micro QuickJS Javascript Engine \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs
39. Duktape Programmer's Guide, accessed July 1, 2026, https://duktape.org/guide
40. How to optimize performance \- (o) Duktape Wiki, accessed July 1, 2026, https://wiki.duktape.org/performance
41. Performance comparison between JerryScript vs Duktape · Issue \#768 \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/jerryscript-project/jerryscript/issues/768
42. Duktape 2.1.0 performance measurement, accessed July 1, 2026, https://wiki.duktape.org/performance210
43. JavaScript language considerations on embedded devices using the XS engine \- Moddable, accessed July 1, 2026, https://www.moddable.com/documentation/xs/XS%20Differences
44. moddable/documentation/xs/preload.md at public \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/Moddable-OpenSource/moddable/blob/public/documentation/xs/preload.md
45. Documentation | XS | Mods – User Installed Extensions \- Moddable, accessed July 1, 2026, https://www.moddable.com/documentation/xs/mods
46. Embedded Challenge \- Hardened JavaScript, accessed July 1, 2026, https://hardenedjs.org/challenge/embedded/
47. Hermes vs QuickJS | What are the differences? \- StackShare, accessed July 1, 2026, https://stackshare.io/stackups/hermes-vs-quickjs
48. holepunchto/bare \- GitSummarize, accessed July 1, 2026, https://gitsummarize.com/holepunchto/bare
49. GitHub \- holepunchto/bare-make: Opinionated build system generator based on CMake, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/holepunchto/bare-make
50. Optimize npm package size by downloading platform-specific binaries in postinstall (\~100MB \-\> \~20MB) · Issue \#2766 · openai/codex \- GitHub, accessed July 1, 2026, https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/2766