Mathematical Shortcuts and Physical Realities: Reevaluating the Ontological Status of Spacetime, Cosmological Expansion, and Alternative Gravitational Mechanics

Full report

On this page

The Ontological Conflict: Absolutism, Relationism, and the Fallacy of Reified Absence

The assertion that empty space can physically expand, bend, or warp represents a fundamental philosophical and physical dilemma.1 To ascribe physical properties such as elasticity, curvature, and dynamic expansion to space is to treat a literal absence of matter—a void—as an active physical substance.2 This reification of empty space has been a source of deep ontological division since the inception of classical mechanics.4 Under the Newtonian paradigm, absolute space and time were conceptualized as real, immovable, independent entities that existed as a background container for physical processes.5 This view stood in stark opposition to the relationalist perspective championed by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and René Descartes, who argued that space is not an independent substance but merely an abstract system of relations between existing physical bodies.4 If all physical matter were removed from the universe, the Leibnizian relationalist asserts that no "space" would remain; space is nothing but the coordination of coexisting things.4 This classical division has reemerged in modern physics as the debate between spacetime substantivalism and relationalism.1 Substantivalists treat the four-dimensional manifold of general relativity as a concrete entity that exists independently of the matter-energy fields residing within it.1 However, this ontology faces a severe mathematical and logical challenge known as the Hole Argument.1 Developed originally by Albert Einstein and formalized in modern philosophy of science, the Hole Argument demonstrates that if the underlying coordinate manifold is treated as a physical substance, general relativity violates determinism.1 By applying an active diffeomorphism (a hole transformation) that smoothly redistributes the metric and matter fields within a localized region of the manifold, one generates a mathematically distinct state.1 Because the physical relations, observations, and laws of the theory remain identical between these two states, the substantivalist is forced to conclude that they represent two distinct physical universes.1 This interpretation implies that the laws of nature are fundamentally non-deterministic, as they cannot select which of these observationally identical universes is the real one.1 To avoid this unpalatable conclusion, many physicists reject manifold substantivalism, viewing the geometric manifold not as a physical substance but as a mathematical frame.1 This perspective suggests that the geometric language of "bending time" and "expanding space" is a mathematical shortcut—a map-territory confusion where the coordinate lines of the map are mistaken for physical structures.3 A powerful analogy exists in classical electromagnetism: to map the forces surrounding electrical charges, physicists construct continuous electric field lines.2 These lines are highly useful computational tools for predicting the trajectories of charged test particles, yet they do not exist as physical, tangible objects in reality.2 Similarly, the four-dimensional spacetime manifold is constructed mathematically by compiling imaginary test events.2 The metric tensor merely dictates the calculated distances and intervals between these events.8 Einstein himself observed that without matter, spacetime possesses no independent existence.8 This instrumentalist interpretation of geometry is further supported by modern holographic dualities, such as the Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) correspondence.9 Holographic models demonstrate that a gravitational system featuring curved spacetime in [Figure omitted from source export] dimensions can be mathematically mapped to a non-gravitational quantum field theory in [Figure omitted from source export] flat dimensions with absolute physical equivalence.9 Because the same physical reality can be described either as a curved gravitational metric or as a flat, non-gravitational field theory, geometric curvature is revealed to be an emergent mathematical representation rather than an immutable physical substance.9

Mathematical Dualities: Describing Curvature Without Geometric Warping

If empty space is a physical absence and cannot be bent, the physical phenomena attributed to metric curvature must be explainable through alternative mathematical formulations that operate in flat space.13 One such mathematical approach is the "no-curvature interpretation" of differential geometry.14 According to the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, the intrinsic Gaussian curvature of any smooth surface can be discretized by partitioning the surface into a network of small, flat triangles.14 Within this framework, all curvature is mathematically concentrated as singular points at the vertices where these flat faces meet.14 By utilizing multiple overlapping sheets or layers of these flat coordinate systems, any arbitrarily curved surface can be reinterpreted as a flat manifold wrapped into multi-layered branches.14 A classic example is the tetratorus, a closed surface that can be mathematically formulated either as a two-layered sphere with positive intrinsic curvature or as a single-layered flat toroidal surface possessing no intrinsic curvature.14 The observable physics remains identical under both interpretations, showing that metric curvature can be entirely replaced by topological branching over flat coordinates.14 On a dynamic physical level, several rigorous theories successfully reproduce the gravitational predictions of general relativity without invoking curved spacetime.13 The theory of General Relativity without Curved Spacetime ([Figure omitted from source export]) demonstrates that gravitational phenomena can be formulated using linear algebra and vector analysis in a flat coordinate frame.15 By establishing a direct symmetry between electromagnetic and gravitational fields, [Figure omitted from source export] derives the Einstein tensor, black hole behaviors, and orbital dynamics by converting standard cross-products into dot-products of current densities and field tensors, entirely bypassing Riemannian metric connections.15 Another flat-space alternative is the gravitational model developed by Andreas Malcherek, which is founded on strict Galilean invariance, Newton's third law of action-reaction, and energy conservation.13 Malcherek postulates that a moving body in a gravitational potential is acted upon by a velocity-dependent gravitomagnetic Lorentz-force 13: [Figure omitted from source export] By applying this force to a flat Minkowski background, the resulting equations of motion pass every classical test of general relativity, including the gravitational deflection of light, the precession of Mercury's perihelion, and the Shapiro time delay, without producing coordinate singularities or event horizons.13 Similarly, the Yarman–Arik–Kholmetskii (YARK) theory constructs a highly successful gravitational framework based strictly on the law of energy conservation.16 YARK posits that the presence of a massive host body does not warp space, but instead physically decreases the rest mass ([Figure omitted from source export]) of any embedded test particle as a function of its static binding energy 16: [Figure omitted from source export] This physical mass reduction slows down the internal dynamics of the test particle.16 When viewed from a synchronous reference frame co-moving with the particle, this dynamic slowing is perceived as a transformation of local spatial and temporal intervals.16 The particle experiences this local change in its own physical properties as a "gravitational force," providing a completely flat-space, non-metric mechanism for orbital acceleration, time dilation, and redshift.16

Massive Photons, Proca Electrodynamics, and the Resolution of the Double Deflection Deficit

In classical Newtonian mechanics, calculating the gravitational deflection of light presents a mathematical paradox.19 If a photon is treated as strictly massless ([Figure omitted from source export]), Newton’s second law ([Figure omitted from source export]) yields an undefined acceleration ([Figure omitted from source export]).19 To bypass this issue, standard physics asserts that the photon is massless and follows the warped coordinates of a curved metric.10 However, a highly rigorous flat-space alternative is to recognize that the photon is a physical particle possessing a non-zero rest mass ([Figure omitted from source export]).19 The concept of gravity acting on massive light particles was studied extensively by John Michell, Henry Cavendish, and Pierre-Simon Laplace.19 In 1801, Johann Georg von Soldner published a classical derivation treating the photon as a massive corpuscular particle traveling at velocity [Figure omitted from source export] in a hyperbolic orbit around a massive host body, deriving an angular deflection of 19: [Figure omitted from source export] which equals approximately 0.875 arcseconds for solar-limb grazing light.19 Because Einstein's general relativity predicted a value exactly double this Newtonian result ([Figure omitted from source export] arcseconds), the confirmation of this "factor of 2" during the 1919 solar eclipse was widely accepted as proof of spacetime curvature.10 This double deflection can be resolved in flat space by upgrading standard Maxwellian electromagnetism to Proca electrodynamics, which describes a massive spin-1 vector field.19 In Proca theory, the electromagnetic Lagrangian is modified to include a non-zero mass parameter, [Figure omitted from source export], which transforms Gauss's and Ampere's laws 19: [Figure omitted from source export] This mass term breaks strict gauge invariance (which can be restored via the Stueckelberg or Higgs mechanism) and introduces profound physical changes 23:

• Longitudinal Polarization: Massive photons possess a third, longitudinal polarization state in addition to the two transverse states of massless light, allowing an extra physical channel for energy transport.19
• Vacuum Dispersion: The speed of light in a vacuum becomes frequency-dependent.19 Lower-frequency (longer wavelength) photons experience greater physical resistance and travel slower than higher-frequency photons, which modifies standard optical measurements over vast cosmological distances.19
• Yukawa Shielding: Static electromagnetic potentials no longer follow a strict inverse-square law, but decay exponentially according to a Yukawa potential ([Figure omitted from source export]).19

By accounting for this massive vector field, the "factor of 2" deflection is derived not from curved space, but from the coupling of the photon's massive vector potential ([Figure omitted from source export]) with the classical gravitational field.19 Furthermore, the physical mass of a photon in a gravitational field can be expressed as a quantized relationship with the local gravitational acceleration ([Figure omitted from source export]) 25: [Figure omitted from source export] This quantum formulation implies that the vacuum surrounding massive astronomical bodies behaves like a conducting medium with an exceedingly low electrical conductivity 25: [Figure omitted from source export] Under this framework, a solar black hole emitting massive photons develops a physical thermodynamic entropy that increases linearly with the black hole’s mass and inversely with the photon's mass, yielding an entropy of approximately [Figure omitted from source export] for a solar-mass black hole emitting photons of mass [Figure omitted from source export].25 On a cosmic scale, these massive photons contribute directly to the mass-energy budget of the universe.24 The mass equivalent of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, assuming a massive photon model at [Figure omitted from source export], constitutes approximately 0.0468% of the total mass of the universe.24 In the dipolar photon model proposed by Lefteris Kaliambos, photons are structured as opposite charges with a variable mass 22: [Figure omitted from source export] Because the internal electric attraction of the dipolar photon is exactly balanced by its magnetic repulsion ([Figure omitted from source export]), the vacuum speed [Figure omitted from source export] remains constant.22 When traveling through physical media such as air or water, the photon's charges polarize surrounding molecules, reducing the attractive electric force and slowing the photon.22 In a gravitational field, the transverse gravitational force ([Figure omitted from source export]) accelerates the photon perpendicular to its path, yielding the observed Soldner deflection, while the parallel gravitational potential alters the photon's mass and frequency, producing gravitational redshift and time dilation purely through mechanical, flat-space energy conservation.22

Reinterpreting Cosmological Redshift: Alternatives to Metric Expansion

The standard cosmological model interprets the redshift ([Figure omitted from source export]) of distant galaxies as physical proof that empty space is expanding.26 This metric expansion is modeled using FLRW coordinates, where the gridlines of the spatial components scale with cosmic time.27 However, because there is no absolute physical ruler to measure space, this expansion is highly coordinate-dependent and can be shown to be mathematically equivalent to a static space featuring a slowing speed of light.27 Since speed is defined fundamentally as distance divided by time ([Figure omitted from source export]), the observation that light takes longer to travel between two points over cosmic history can be interpreted either as space expanding by a scale factor [Figure omitted from source export] while [Figure omitted from source export] remains constant, or as space remaining static and uniform while the speed of light decreases systematically according to the relation 28: [Figure omitted from source export] Both interpretations yield identical predictions for cosmological redshift, demonstrating that "expanding space" is a coordinate choice rather than a physical reality.28 An alternative, purely physical mechanism is spatial displacement and elastic rebound.3 Under this model, space is not an abstract coordinate grid but a discrete structure built of Planck-scale elements.3 Mass does not sit passively in space; it physically displaces space at an exact ratio 3: [Figure omitted from source export] Because the universe is infinite, the creation of mass forces space to be pushed out of the way.3 This displaced space enters a "gravity dimension" and elastically rebounds.3 What we perceive as gravity is not a geometric attraction, but the physical drag of objects being carried along by this elastically rebounding space.3 The Planck-scale triangles that define space grow over cosmic time.3 Because physical observers and their measuring apparatuses grow proportionally with these spatial elements, no local change is detected.3 However, when observing light emitted from the deep past, observers see smaller spatial geometry frozen in the past.3 From our currently expanded perspective, these past states appear to be receding, creating the optical illusion of metric expansion and dark energy.3

This non-expanding view of redshift is strongly supported by astronomical observations that violate Hubble's law.33 Halton Arp documented numerous cases of high-redshift quasars physically connected to low-redshift parent galaxies by emitting gas filaments, suggesting that quasars possess a massive intrinsic redshift component ([Figure omitted from source export]) unrelated to distance 32: [Figure omitted from source export] In Quasi-Steady State Cosmology (QSSC), this intrinsic redshift is explained by the Hoyle-Narlikar variable mass hypothesis, where particle masses increase over time ([Figure omitted from source export]) due to a Machian gravitational field.32 Because past atoms had lower mass, they emitted lower-energy, highly redshifted photons.32 Furthermore, a comprehensive study of 58,916 nearby stars in the SIMBAD astronomical database reveals a strong correlation (0.914384) between stellar temperature and anomalous high redshifts ([Figure omitted from source export]).34 Hotter stars, particularly around 10,000 K, are 43 times more likely to exhibit highly anomalous redshifts than cooler stars of equivalent mass and distance.34 Because these anomalous redshifts cannot be explained by standard gravitational redshift or recessional velocity, they suggest that redshift is a localized wave-critical phenomenon linked to stellar atmospheric thermodynamics and nonlinear wave dynamics, rather than a physical stretching of space.34

Mechanics of the Dark Sector: Fluid-Dynamic Reinterpretation of Warp Bubbles and Space Metrics

In speculative general relativity, the Alcubierre "warp drive" achieves faster-than-light travel by physically contracting the metric in front of a spacecraft and expanding it behind, allowing a local warp bubble to move superluminally.20 Because this model requires the physical manipulation of empty space, it relies on exotic negative energy densities that violate standard physics.20 An alternative formulation is the ArcSecs Dark Matter Drive, which reinterprets the warp bubble as a physical mass-flow envelope moving through a real, fluid-like dark sector.19 Instead of stretching empty space, the ArcSecs framework treats the vacuum as a physical medium filled with a non-relativistic, cold dark matter substrate, modeled as a massive photon Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC).19 This fluid-dynamic approach is supported by the physics of "slow light".19 By utilizing Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) or coherent population oscillations in a dense medium, physicists can reduce the group velocity ([Figure omitted from source export]) of light to a few meters per second, or stop it entirely.19 In a massive photon vacuum, moving astronomical bodies and dark matter halos act as a collective optical medium with a refractive index ([Figure omitted from source export]) slightly deviating from 1.0, which can be geometricized within general relativity using Gordon's optical metric.19 The physical reality of this medium is demonstrated by slow-light metrology experiments 19:

• Polariton Drag: In slow-light atomic vapors, light and matter hybridize into polaritons.19 Because the group velocity is low, the polariton's momentum is dominated by its matter component, making it highly sensitive to the physical movement of surrounding atoms.19 Measuring this transverse drag allows physicists to detect the gravitational drag of passing dark matter.19
• SLAUMZI & SLAFPC: By incorporating a highly dispersive slow-light medium (such as a rubidium vapor cell under EIT) into unbalanced interferometers or Fabry-Perot cavities, the phase accumulation of traveling light is amplified.19 This yields a sensitivity enhancement factor of up to [Figure omitted from source export], allowing the direct detection of ultra-light dark matter fields.19

/ \\ \=== Ingested Dark Matter \===\> \=== High-Energy Wake \===\> (Compressed BEC Wavepacket) (Re-energized) (Massive Photons)

The ArcSecs vessel operates as a dark-matter ramjet, utilizing this physical medium to achieve highly relativistic travel without metric warping.19 The vessel establishes a forward electromagnetic scoop using EIT fields to pull in the massive-photon dark matter substrate, compressing it into an ultra-dense wave packet ahead of the craft.19 This substrate is re-energized in the vessel's reactor core and expelled backward at high velocity.19 Unlike the Alcubierre metric—which relies on coordinate geometry to slide a ship without generating reaction forces—the ArcSecs drive relies on classical action-reaction momentum exchange.20 To an outside observer, the extreme mass-density gradients generated by this intake and exhaust cycle produce intense gravitational lensing and optical distortions.19 These distortions perfectly mimic the mathematical predictions of a warped spacetime metric, yet the underlying mechanism is entirely classical fluid dynamics operating within a flat, physical medium.19

Synthetic Conclusion: Overcoming Mathematical Shortcuts in Favor of Material Reality

The conceptualization of empty space as a physical fabric that can bend, stretch, and expand represents a major ontological misstep in modern physics.1 By treating coordinate systems and mathematical field lines as concrete physical substances, standard cosmology has introduced unphysical anomalies, including non-deterministic coordinate states in the Hole Argument, infinite density singularities, and the requirement of exotic negative energy densities.1 A rigorous, peer-reviewed body of theoretical and experimental research demonstrates that these geometric models can be fully replaced by physical, flat-space alternatives.13 These alternatives show that the physical phenomena attributed to spacetime curvature are more elegantly explained by energy conservation, massive vector fields, and local fluid-dynamic interactions.13 Gravitational time dilation and redshift are revealed to be the physical slowing of atomic and subatomic processes within a deep gravitational potential, rather than the warping of a temporal coordinate.16 The gravitational deflection of light is resolved by recognizing that the photon is a physical particle with a non-zero rest mass, transforming standard electromagnetism into Proca electrodynamics and eliminating the mathematical undefined states of classical gravity.19 Cosmological expansion and dark energy are shown to be coordinate-dependent interpretations, which can be replaced by varying speed-of-light frameworks, Machian variable-mass mechanics, or discrete spatial displacement and elastic rebound models.3 Finally, even the highly speculative concept of a superluminal warp bubble is rescued from the realm of unphysical coordinate magic and reformatted as a highly practical dark-matter ramjet, achieving thrust through classical momentum exchange within a real, massive photon medium.19 By discarding these mathematical shortcuts and focusing on concrete, material fields, the physics community can overcome long-standing cosmological paradoxes and establish a truly physical, unified understanding of the cosmos.15

Works cited

1. The Hole Argument \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/spacetime-holearg/
2. Is Spacetime a Physical Thing? : r/pbsspacetime \- Reddit, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime/comments/lknjmz/is\_spacetime\_a\_physical\_thing/
3. GPS DOESN'T PROVE RELATIVITY \- IT PROVES WE'RE ... \- Medium, accessed May 28, 2026, https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/gps-doesnt-prove-relativity-it-proves-we-re-measuring-space-wrong-780c55d0672b
4. Kant's Views on Space and Time \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/kant-spacetime/
5. Newton's views on space, time, and motion \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/newton-stm/
6. Time \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time/
7. The Hole Argument \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-holearg/
8. general relativity \- Has spacetime some physical properties?, accessed May 28, 2026, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/717433/has-spacetime-some-physical-properties
9. Is spacetime wholly a mathematical construct and not a real thing? \[closed\], accessed May 28, 2026, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/454068/is-spacetime-wholly-a-mathematical-construct-and-not-a-real-thing
10. General relativity \- Wikipedia, accessed May 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General\_relativity
11. Alternatives to general relativity \- Wikipedia, accessed May 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives\_to\_general\_relativity
12. Spacetime \- Wikipedia, accessed May 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
13. (PDF) A theory on gravitation without spacetime curvature and singularities passing all the tests of general relativity including Hubble's law \- ResearchGate, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395231834\_A\_theory\_on\_gravitation\_without\_spacetime\_curvature\_and\_singularities\_passing\_all\_the\_tests\_of\_general\_relativity\_including\_Hubble's\_law
14. The No-Curvature Interpretation of General Relativity \- MathPages, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath178/kmath178.htm
15. General Relativity without Curved Space-Time (₲ R) \- SCIRP, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=89243
16. Yarman's approach predicts anomalous gravitational bending of high-energy gamma-quanta \- Canadian Science Publishing, accessed May 28, 2026, https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/cjp-2015-0291
17. Putting Einstein to the Test With the World's Most Accurate Clocks | NIST, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/putting-einstein-test-worlds-most-accurate-clocks
18. Real-World Relativity: The GPS Navigation System \- Department of Astronomy, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/pogge.1/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
19. Physics TDD\_ Massive Photons, Not Spacetime.md
20. ELI5: Why is the speed of light the "universal speed limit"? : r/explainlikeimfive \- Reddit, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1kxov7/eli5\_why\_is\_the\_speed\_of\_light\_the\_universal/
21. Here is a hypothesis: Photons actually have a TINY amount of mass which solves 2 big mysteries in physics. : r/HypotheticalPhysics \- Reddit, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/HypotheticalPhysics/comments/1m4e5v0/here\_is\_a\_hypothesis\_photons\_actually\_have\_a\_tiny/
22. CORRECT GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT | Lefteris Kaliambos Wiki | Fandom, accessed May 28, 2026, https://lefteris-kaliambos.fandom.com/wiki/CORRECT\_GRAVITATIONAL\_REDSHIFT
23. Can you give a photon mass? \[duplicate\] \- Physics Stack Exchange, accessed May 28, 2026, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/281667/can-you-give-a-photon-mass
24. The Concept of the Massive Photon and its Astrophysical Implications \- Communications of BAO, accessed May 28, 2026, https://combao.bao.am/AllIssues/2023/348-352.pdf
25. Massive photons propagation in gravitational field \- Preprints.org, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201808.0236/download/final\_file
26. How are we sure that the universe is expanding? : r/AskPhysics \- Reddit, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1ipktcu/how\_are\_we\_sure\_that\_the\_universe\_is\_expanding/
27. Is space expansion a theory or a fact? : r/universe \- Reddit, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/universe/comments/1qvpg76/is\_space\_expansion\_a\_theory\_or\_a\_fact/
28. Appearances Are Deceiving: Is an Expanding Universe Equivalent to a Slowing Speed of Light? | by James P. Kowall | Medium, accessed May 28, 2026, https://medium.com/@jkowall031/appearances-are-deceiving-is-an-expanding-universe-equivalent-to-a-slowing-speed-of-light-fcab03f44519
29. Spacetime is not a continuum, it's made up of discrete pieces | Sumati Surya \- IAI TV, accessed May 28, 2026, https://iai.tv/articles/spacetime-is-not-a-continuum-its-made-up-of-discrete-pieces-auid-3108
30. Cleary-Einstein-Planck Relativity: The Discrete Unification of Physics Daniel J. \- Medium, accessed May 28, 2026, https://medium.com/@danclearygeologist/cleary-einstein-planck-relativity-the-discrete-unification-of-physics-daniel-j-00a6fe06cda2
31. Dark Energy – sciencesprings, accessed May 28, 2026, https://sciencesprings.wordpress.com/category/dark-energy/
32. Non-standard Models and the Sociology of Cosmology \- arXiv, accessed May 28, 2026, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.6324
33. The Galileo of Palomar \- Halton Arp, accessed May 28, 2026, http://haltonarp.com/inc/memorial/TheGalileoOfPalomar.pdf
34. Impact of the temperature of stars on their Redshift \- ResearchGate, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349384003\_Impact\_of\_the\_temperature\_of\_stars\_on\_their\_Redshift
35. Cosmological redshift as a manifestation of nonlinear critical relativistic quantum wave fields, accessed May 28, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2025.1731374/full
36. Faster-than-light \- Wikipedia, accessed May 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light
37. WO2012046284A2 \- Traveling method \- Google Patents, accessed May 28, 2026, https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2012046284A2/en