Comprehensive Assessment of Global Geopolitical Instability, Military Conflict, and Strategic Transformations: 2026 Mid-Year Review

Full report

On this page

Executive Summary of the Global Security Environment

The geopolitical landscape of the first half of 2026 represents a historic inflection point characterized by the simultaneous escalation of major regional wars, the collapse of legacy deterrence frameworks, and the unprecedented hybridization of military and law enforcement operations. Throughout this period, the international system has transitioned away from the post-Cold War consensus and into an era of unconstrained multi-domain conflict. This shift was catalyzed most visibly by the expiration of the New START Treaty between the United States and the Russian Federation on February 5, 2026, an event that formally dissolved the last remaining bilateral strategic nuclear arms control architecture and introduced profound strategic ambiguity into the global security calculus1. Against this backdrop of eroding structural deterrence, major powers have increasingly resorted to direct kinetic action to achieve strategic and regional objectives. The security environment has been structurally altered by three primary theaters of overt conflict: the eruption of direct, state-on-state hostilities between the United States, Israel, and the Islamic Republic of Iran2; the implementation of Operation Southern Spear in the Western Hemisphere, which culminated in the military decapitation of the Venezuelan government and a regional naval quarantine4; and the radical evolution of the Russo-Ukrainian War into a widespread maritime insurgency and deep-strike attrition campaign6. Concurrently, these macro-level tectonic shifts have generated severe secondary effects, most notably the proliferation of decentralized, lone-wolf terrorism and domestic political volatility within Western nations8. The synthesis of these events indicates a transition away from localized proxy conflicts toward integrated, continuous warfare that directly threatens global energy supplies, agricultural supply chains, domestic political cohesion, and international homeland security. The analysis that follows provides an exhaustive examination of these developments, supported by detailed statistical matrices, to map the profound transformations of 2026\.

The Middle Eastern Conflagration: Operation Epic Fury and the Asymmetric Fallout

The most consequential geopolitical pivot of the decade materialized in late February 2026, when the United States and Israel launched coordinated, massive airstrikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Operating under the explicitly stated objective of regime change, this operation marked the termination of decades of shadow conflict and pushed the Middle East into overt, multi-front hostilities2.

The Decapitation Strike and Regional Escalation

The initiation of Operation Epic Fury on February 28 directly resulted in the assassination of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei2. This unprecedented decapitation strike immediately triggered a cascading regional war. The immediate aftermath witnessed a severe disruption of global energy markets, as Iran and its regional proxy network—frequently referred to as the Axis of Resistance—threatened to completely block the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Mandeb, effectively choking off one of the world's most critical economic arteries1. The United States responded by enforcing a stringent naval blockade of Iranian ports, deploying heavy naval assets to the region to interdict maritime traffic and suppress Iranian retaliatory capabilities1. The conflict rapidly enveloped neighboring states and regional waterways. In Kuwait, the U.S. Central Command was forced to intercept multiple Iranian ballistic missiles targeting American military installations, which the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed were utilized to coordinate attacks on Bandar Sirik10. The maritime domain became highly volatile, with the IRGC naval forces attacking the Panama-flagged, U.S.-owned container ship MSC Sariska in the Sea of Oman, prompting the U.S. Central Command to redirect over 100 commercial ships and disable four others to enforce the blockade10.

Diplomatic Interventions and the Fragility of the Islamabad Memorandum

Recognizing the catastrophic potential of a prolonged energy blockade, regional actors frantically sought diplomatic off-ramps. By mid-June, mediator efforts spearheaded by Pakistan brought the primary belligerents to the negotiating table10. Between June 15 and June 17, the United States and Iran announced and signed the Islamabad Memorandum, a comprehensive 14-point agreement designed to de-escalate the immediate crisis1. The treaty mandated a 60-day ceasefire, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the lifting of the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports, and the establishment of a framework for resuming negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program1. However, the structural fragility of this diplomatic breakthrough became immediately apparent, hampered by the interconnected nature of Middle Eastern security. By late June, Iran formally announced a pause on peace talks, citing continued Israeli military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon and ongoing operations in Gaza as direct violations of the ceasefire's broader regional implications10. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi appealed to Pakistani foreign minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar to facilitate de-escalation, while Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf declared the U.S. naval blockade an ongoing violation10. Consequently, the Iranian military command issued threats to blockade the Strait of Hormuz entirely to all but Omani and select allied shipping traffic, resulting in a precarious standoff where maritime traffic is dictated by unilateral Iranian and Omani coordination10. A subsequent U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah offered a temporary reprieve, yet the overarching regional architecture remains deeply unstable10.

The Long Tail of State-Sponsored Asymmetric Threats

The primary second-order effect of Operation Epic Fury has been the activation of a highly diffuse, asymmetric terrorist network operating within the U.S. homeland and allied nations. Iranian intelligence doctrine has historically relied on deploying agents, criminal surrogates, and terrorist proxies, but 2026 has witnessed a marked strategic shift toward inspiring "lone offender" attacks9. The Department of Homeland Security issued severe warnings regarding this threat matrix, which rapidly materialized into kinetic violence8. The geographic dispersion of these attacks demonstrates the complexity of the threat. On January 25, an individual utilizing a U-Haul truck engaged in a vehicle-ramming attack against an anti-Iranian government protest in Los Angeles, California13. More severe was the March 1 lone-wolf mass shooting at a bar in Austin, Texas, which left four dead and 15 injured; the Federal Bureau of Investigation continues to investigate this as a direct retaliatory terrorist act linked to the U.S. strikes on Iran3. Furthermore, May 2026 witnessed a highly brazen armed assault on a security checkpoint outside the White House in Washington, D.C., where a gunman wounded a bystander before being neutralized by the Secret Service11. These incidents demonstrate a calculated evolution in geopolitical retaliation: utilizing radicalized domestic actors to inflict psychological and physical attrition on the homeland without providing a conventional military footprint that could invite overwhelming conventional airstrikes.

The Western Hemisphere Security Realignment: Operation Southern Spear

Operating concurrently with operations in the Middle East, the United States executed a paradigm-shifting military campaign in the Western Hemisphere. Operation Southern Spear, initiated in late 2025 and dramatically escalated in early 2026 by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, represents a profound hybridization of the global war on terror and the war on drugs4. The campaign's stated objective is to detect, disrupt, and degrade transnational criminal networks, specifically targeting organizations that the U.S. has designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs), including the Venezuelan Cartel of the Suns4.

Operation Absolute Resolve and the Decapitation of the Venezuelan State

The most pivotal military action on the South American continent occurred on January 3, 2026, operating under the sub-directive Operation Absolute Resolve. At approximately 02:01 local time, U.S. military forces conducted massive suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) strikes across northern Venezuela, culminating in a direct special operations assault on the presidential compound in Caracas4. During this highly coordinated raid involving Delta Force and the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, U.S. forces successfully captured incumbent Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, extracting them from the country to face criminal charges in the United States3. Lasting merely 2 hours and 28 minutes, Operation Absolute Resolve is categorized as one of the shortest conventional wars in modern history, yet its ripple effects have fundamentally altered the continent5. Following the extraction, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as acting president, and widespread amnesty was granted to over 621 political prisoners5. The power vacuum has precipitated intense internal volatility, effectively dismantling the core of the ALBA-TCP alliance in the region and neutralizing a primary anti-Western foothold in the Americas4.

Naval Quarantine and the Expansion of Hostilities

To enforce the economic isolation of the remnants of the Maduro network and interdict illicit narcotics, the U.S. Department of War, in coordination with the Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security, established a naval quarantine in the Caribbean Sea16. The deployment of heavy assets, including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group and Amphibious Ready Groups (comprising the USS Iwo Jima, USS San Antonio, and USS Fort Lauderdale), facilitated the aggressive boarding and seizure of multiple sanctioned crude tankers15. Notable interdictions include the apprehension of the Motor Vessel Sagitta on January 20 and the Motor/Tanker Veronica on January 15, both of which attempted to defy the blockade16. The operational doctrine of Southern Spear relies heavily on a hybrid fleet of vessels equipped with robotics and autonomous systems to detect and combat drug trafficking networks4. Between September 2025 and March 2026, the U.S. military executed lethal airstrikes against at least 45 small boats suspected of shipping illegal narcotics, resulting in 156 individuals killed or presumed dead15. The operation expanded geographically on March 6, 2026, when U.S. forces bombed the Comandos de la Frontera in Ecuador, directly integrating U.S. military force into the ongoing Ecuadorian internal conflict4. This was followed by a joint assassination operation on June 12, resulting in the death of notorious Tren de Aragua gang leader Niño Guerrero via an airstrike in Venezuela4. The strategic implications of this campaign indicate a permanent shift in U.S. doctrine: treating narcotics cartels in the Western Hemisphere not as criminal enterprises requiring law enforcement solutions, but as insurgent paramilitaries requiring kinetic military eradication via autonomous fleets, aerial bombardment, and special operations raids4.

The Russo-Ukrainian War: Maritime Insurgency and Attrition

In Eastern Europe, the conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine has devolved into a brutal war of severe infrastructural attrition, marked by innovative maritime insurgency, deep-strike capabilities, and significant domestic political restructuring within Ukraine.

The Azov Sea Shadow Fleet Annihilation Campaign

Unable to match Russia's conventional naval tonnage, Ukraine leveraged its distinct advantage in asymmetric drone warfare to effectively cripple Russian maritime logistics. Beginning on July 6, 2026, Ukraine initiated a massive, highly coordinated drone strike campaign targeting Russian and foreign-flagged "shadow fleet" oil tankers operating in the Azov and Black Seas6. Within a single week, Ukrainian autonomous naval and aerial drones had struck over 100 vessels, systematically dismantling Russia's ability to export sanctioned oil and transport military supplies through these critical maritime corridors6. This campaign achieved a profound strategic victory by forcing the Russian government to halt shipping through the Don-Azov canal, effectively trapping the Caspian flotilla and severing a route responsible for approximately a quarter of Russia's grain exports6. Ukraine legally justified this campaign by asserting that the shadow fleet vessels financially sustain the Russian war effort and are utilized for hybrid warfare, troop transport, and intelligence gathering6. Russia immediately retaliated by targeting civilian and commercial shipping, culminating in a July 20 missile strike on a Guinean-Bissau-flagged merchant ship near Odesa, which killed 10 crew members, including a Ukrainian pilot, and triggered a spike in global wheat prices7.

Strategic Deep Strikes and Civilian Attrition

Simultaneously, the air war intensified drastically. Ukraine successfully executed long-range drone strikes deep into Russian territory, notably hitting a major oil refinery in Omsk—situated approximately 2,500 kilometers from the Ukrainian border—further degrading the financial engine sustaining the Russian war effort6. In response, Russian forces maintained a relentless bombardment of Ukrainian population centers, utilizing long-range missiles and short-range drones. June 2026 marked a devastating high for civilian casualties, reaching the highest total number of civilians killed and injured since April 2022\. At least 293 civilians were killed and 1,990 injured in June alone, representing a 37% increase over the same period in 202519. Long-range weapons targeting urban centers such as Kyiv, Dnipro, and Zaporizhzhia accounted for 45% of these losses19. On July 6, a Russian drone and missile attack on Kyiv killed 19 civilians and injured 76 others, while a subsequent strike caused detonations at an unauthorized weapons warehouse in the civilian-heavy district of Vyshneve, killing nine6.

Domestic Political Crisis and Strategic Restructuring in Ukraine

The mounting casualties and strategic exhaustion triggered significant domestic instability within Ukraine. In mid-July, mass street protests erupted in Kyiv and other major cities, demanding accountability for the war's trajectory and the government's handling of the conflict7. Facing immense public pressure, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy executed a sweeping government reorganization18. He controversially dismissed the highly popular Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Colonel General Oleksandr Syrskyi, and Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, a primary architect of Ukraine's innovative drone and robotics warfare doctrine7. Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko also stepped down as part of this political reset18. This internal friction presents a critical vulnerability; while Ukraine's drone forces have achieved unprecedented tactical successes, the fracturing of national political unity threatens to undermine the overall strategic effort against a numerically superior adversary. The conflict's toll remains staggering, with vast discrepancies in casualty reporting.

Global Terrorism, Espionage, and Mega-Event Security

The global security architecture is further complicated by the metastasis of terrorism in the Global South and the unique vulnerabilities posed by international mega-events in the West. The nature of radicalization has shifted profoundly toward digital channels, prompting INTERPOL to emphasize the critical exchange of battlefield biometric data and social media intelligence to track foreign terrorist fighters21.

The Epicenter of Organized Global Terrorism

According to the 2026 Global Terrorism Index, sub-Saharan Africa remains the undisputed global epicenter of extremist violence, with the Sahel region accounting for more than half of all terrorism-related deaths worldwide22. Despite a global decrease in the sheer volume of attacks—falling by nearly 22%—the lethality in specific conflict zones remains acute. The Islamic State (IS) and Al Qaeda affiliates dominate this landscape. Nigeria witnessed a dramatic surge in IS activity, jumping to 92 attacks in a single year, while the Democratic Republic of the Congo saw civilian deaths rise by 28% due to the IS-affiliated Allied Democratic Forces (ADF)22. In Somalia, Al-Shabaab launched the massive Shabelle Offensive, advancing to within 50 kilometers of Mogadishu by exploiting political fractures and an arms pipeline from Yemen's Houthis22. Concurrently, Pakistan recorded the highest score on the terrorism index globally, driven by a violent resurgence of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), fueled by cross-border instability and alleged militant staging from Afghan territory22.

The Domestic Lone-Wolf Threat and Political Espionage

In Western democracies, the primary threat mechanism has shifted definitively from organized, cell-based attacks to radicalized lone-wolf actors. Analysis indicates that lone-wolf attackers have carried out 93% of fatal terrorist incidents in the West over the past five years22. High-profile politically motivated assassinations have highlighted severe gaps in domestic protective intelligence. Notable incidents include the assassination of conservative political influencer Charlie Kirk and the targeted killing of two Israeli Embassy staff members in Washington D.C.22. Furthermore, a targeted attack by jihadist extremists on Jewish Australians resulted in the deaths of 15 civilians, standing as the nation's worst terrorist incident and deadliest mass shooting since 199622. Youth radicalization has emerged as a pressing concern, with minors and youths accounting for an increasing percentage of thwarted plots22.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup Security Matrix

These localized vulnerabilities converge with the logistical nightmare of securing the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Scheduled for June and July across 16 host cities in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, the tournament is the largest sporting event in history1. With the field expanded to 48 teams playing 104 matches, the attack surface for potential terrorists is unprecedented14. Intelligence agencies face a dual-pronged threat: the potential for orchestrated attacks by state-backed actors (such as Iranian operatives seeking retaliation for Operation Epic Fury) and the higher-probability risk of domestic extremists targeting soft infrastructure like fan zones, transit corridors, and hotel districts8. Security organizations are actively overhauling their threat intelligence strategies to incorporate open-source intelligence (OSINT) and geopolitical risk modeling14. Several nations have actively altered their logistical footprints to mitigate risk. The Iranian national football team strategically relocated its base camp to Tijuana, Mexico, utilizing FIFA approvals to avoid U.S. visa and security entanglements, while the DR Congo team isolated its squad to avert security and health-related disruptions11.

Global Political Volatility, Scandals, and Electoral Shifts

Amidst kinetic conflicts and terrorist threats, the global political order experienced severe institutional shocks, marked by a wave of critical elections and highly disruptive intelligence leaks.

The Epstein Files and the Erosion of Institutional Trust

On January 30, 2026, three million pages of documents related to the "Epstein Files," including 180,000 images and 2,000 videos, were released to the public3. This massive data dump implicated numerous high-profile public figures worldwide, causing immediate political casualties. Foremost among these was Peter Mandelson, a former British Ambassador to the United States and cabinet member, who was forced to resign from the Labour Party and the House of Lords on February 1 over accusations that he forwarded internal government emails to Jeffrey Epstein and maintained illicit links2. This scandal severely damaged public trust in Western political institutions at a time when domestic cohesion is critical for sustaining overseas military engagements.

A Wave of Consequential Global Elections and Transitions

The first half of 2026 witnessed a series of elections that reshaped regional power dynamics.

Other notable electoral events included the Prosperity Party's reelection in Ethiopia under Abiy Ahmed, the Civil Contract's victory in Armenia under Nikol Pashinyan, and victories in Costa Rica, Portugal, and Barbados1. In the United States, deep domestic polarization persisted, highlighted by a federal government shutdown in January that forced unpaid ICE agents to assist TSA operations, an FBI raid on an election center in Fulton County, Georgia, and the physical attack on Representative Ilhan Omar during a town hall3.

Environmental, Economic, and Cultural Milestones

While military and political events dominated the strategic landscape, 2026 also featured significant economic milestones, severe environmental anomalies, and major cultural events.

Economic Shifts and Disaster Impacts

The global economy saw a historic concentration of wealth on June 12, when Elon Musk officially became the first U.S. dollar trillionaire following the highly anticipated initial public offering (IPO) of SpaceX1. This financial milestone underscores the rapid privatization of the space domain and its increasing integration into global telecommunications and defense, evidenced by the Iranian government's efforts to shut down Starlink internet during domestic protests13. On the corporate front, Amazon announced an additional 16,000 job layoffs in a second round of corporate reductions, reflecting ongoing turbulence in the tech sector3. In the legal domain, a California jury found Bill Cosby liable for a 1972 rape, awarding $19 million in damages3. Environmentally, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration declared the onset of a massive El Niño event on June 11, forecasting a 63% chance that it will rank among the largest since 19501. This climate anomaly threatens to severely disrupt global agriculture, compounding the food security crisis triggered by the Black Sea shipping disruptions. Disasters have already exacted a heavy toll; on June 8, a magnitude 7.8 earthquake struck the Philippines, killing 82 people, while on June 24, devastating twin earthquakes (Mw 7.2 and 7.5) hit western Venezuela, killing at least 4,333 individuals and causing catastrophic widespread damage1. Further tragedy struck in Angola, where 28 illegal gold miners were buried alive in a landslide11, and in Rio de Janeiro, where a mid-air helicopter collision killed six, including American singer-songwriter Oliver Tree and Argentine YouTuber Gaspi1.

Cultural and Sporting Mega-Events

Despite global instability, international cultural and sporting events continued to draw massive global audiences. In Spain, the blessing ceremony of the Sagrada Família's tallest tower by Pope Leo XIV was held on June 10, exactly 100 years after the death of architect Antoni Gaudí, officially making it the world's tallest church1. In France, Romanian director Cristian Mungiu won his second Palme d'Or for the drama film Fjord at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival11. The sporting calendar was exceptionally dense. The 2026 Winter Olympics were successfully held in Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo, Italy in February1. In association football, aside from the men's FIFA World Cup, the UEFA Women's Champions League was won by Spain's FC Barcelona, who defeated OL Lyonnes 4-0 in Oslo, while the AFC Women's Champions League was claimed by North Korea's Naegohyang11. Domestically, Hull City secured promotion to the English Premier League following an espionage incident that resulted in the expulsion of Southampton F.C., and Celtic secured a record-extending 43rd Scottish Cup title11. The 2026 Women's T20 World Cup in cricket was won by Australia1, and the 24 Hours of Le Mans took place seamlessly in France1. The breadth of these events highlights the resilient, parallel nature of global civil society operating amidst profound geopolitical friction.

Strategic Event Matrix: Pivotal 2026 World Events (Spreadsheet)

The following structured matrix provides an exhaustive, granular breakdown of the most pivotal global events of 2026 to date. Per specific operational requirements, this table synthesizes exact locations, standard geographical coordinates, detailed operational descriptions, and the subsequent global impact of each occurrence, prioritizing military actions, lone wolf attacks, espionage, and continent-scale events.

Strategic Foresight and Defensive Posturing

The vast array of data and geopolitical maneuvers observed throughout the first half of 2026 suggests a permanent fracturing of the post-Cold War security architecture. The deployment of the U.S. military in the Western Hemisphere to physically eradicate cartel networks via Operation Southern Spear indicates a definitive shift toward unilateral, kinetic problem-solving by global hegemons4. This doctrine of preemption and decapitation, identically mirrored in the assassination of Ali Khamenei during Operation Epic Fury, demonstrates that traditional diplomatic deterrence has been largely replaced by military degradation2. Looking toward the remainder of 2026 and into 2027, three primary risk vectors require immediate intelligence allocation and defensive posturing. First is the explicit weaponization of global chokepoints. The collapse of Azov Sea shipping and the ongoing Strait of Hormuz crisis are not isolated tactical events; they serve as a blueprint for modern asymmetric warfare6. Both state and non-state actors recognize that the most effective leverage against the West is the strangulation of energy and agricultural supply chains. Second, the domestic attrition strategy will intensify. State adversaries, particularly Iran and Russia, will increasingly rely on inspiring lone-wolf terrorism to inflict political costs on Western leaders without triggering Article 5 or conventional military responses8. Finally, the political fragility in allied nations remains a critical vulnerability. The resignation of the UK Prime Minister and the massive protests forcing the dismissal of Ukraine's military command highlight that domestic populations are reaching a critical threshold of war fatigue and economic exhaustion2. Adversary intelligence operations will likely pivot toward amplifying this domestic friction, utilizing disinformation and targeted digital radicalization to break allied strategic continuity from within.

Works cited

1. 2026 \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026

2. 2026 in politics \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026\_in\_politics

3. 2026 in the United States \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026\_in\_the\_United\_States

4. Operation Southern Spear \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation\_Southern\_Spear

5. 2026 United States intervention in Venezuela \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026\_United\_States\_intervention\_in\_Venezuela

6. Ukraine war situation update | 4 – 10 July 2026 \- ACLED, https://acleddata.com/update/ukraine-war-situation-update-4-10-july-2026

7. Russian attack on Odesa kills three after Ukraine targets Moscow with drones overnight – as it happened, https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jul/20/ukraine-russia-drones-missiles-hungary-germany-latest-news-updates

8. U.S. Homeland Security Concerns After Iran Strikes | Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/articles/iran-and-terrorism-what-the-u-s-strikes-could-mean-for-homeland-security

9. Tehran's Homeland Option: Terror Pathways for Iran to Strike in the United States, https://ctc.westpoint.edu/tehrans-homeland-option-terror-pathways-for-iran-to-strike-in-the-united-states/

10. Portal:Current events/June 2026 \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current\_events/June\_2026

11. Portal:Current events/2026 May 23 \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current\_events/2026\_May\_23

12. The Islamabad Memorandum A Strategic Reassessment of Iran-U.S., https://www.iramcenter.org/en/the-islamabad-memorandum-a-strategic-reassessment-of-iran-us-relations-and-regional-security-architecture\_en-2825

13. Portal:Current events/January 2026 \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current\_events/January\_2026

14. Securing the World Cup Amid Geopolitical Conflict \- ASIS International, https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2026/05/world-cup-security/geopolitical-conflict/

15. Operation Southern Spear, Report to Congress, January 1, 2026-March 31, 2026 \- Department of War, https://media.defense.gov/2026/May/21/2003935694/-1/-1/1/OSS\_Q2\_MAR2026\_FINAL\_508.PDF

16. Maritime Interdiction Operation, Jan. 20, 2026 \- southcom, https://www.southcom.mil/News/PressReleases/Article/4383337/maritime-interdiction-operation-jan-20-2026/

17. Maritime Interdiction Operation, Jan. 15, 2026 \- southcom, https://www.southcom.mil/News/PressReleases/Article/4380252/maritime-interdiction-operation-jan-15-2026/

18. War in Ukraine | Global Conflict Tracker \- Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine

19. Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict — June 2026 | UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/Protection-of-Civilians-in-Armed-Conflict-June-2026

20. The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, July 22, 2026, https://www.russiamatters.org/news/russia-ukraine-war-report-card/russia-ukraine-war-report-card-july-22-2026

21. Terrorism \- Interpol, https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Terrorism

22. Global Terrorism Index 2026 \- Vision of Humanity, https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Global-Terrorism-Index-2026-Report.pdf

23. Violent Extremism in South Asia | Global Conflict Tracker \- Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/war-afghanistan

24. The Terrorist Threat to the 2026 World Cup \- CSIS, https://www.csis.org/analysis/terrorist-threat-2026-world-cup

25. Global Terrorism Forecast 2026 \- S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/global-terrorism-forecast-2026/