Before Yahweh: El, the Divine Family, and the Historical Distinction of El Elyon

Full report

On this page

Historical Profile of El in West Semitic Religion

The supreme deity of the Late Bronze Age West Semitic pantheon was El (written ʾIl or ʾIlu in Ugaritic, translating broadly as "God" or "Deity"), whose characteristics and functions are recorded in the cuneiform tablet archives discovered at Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit) on the northern Syrian coast, dating from roughly 1550 to 1200 BCE1. In these Ugaritic mythological, epic, and administrative texts, El is portrayed as the venerable, patriarchal monarch of the cosmos1. He resides in a royal tent dwelling situated at the "source of the two rivers" (mbk nhrm) amidst the "springs of the two deeps" (qrb ʾfq thmtm), a cosmic location marking the junction between the ordered universe and primordial subterranean waters1. Ugaritic texts record several epithets that define El's divine character and administrative status1:

• Lṭpn ʾIl d Pʾid ("The Benevolent / Kind-Hearted, El the Compassionate"): Expresses his role as a judicious, merciful monarch who exercises supreme executive power while maintaining ultimate wisdom and judicial restraint5.
• ʾAb ʾAdam ("Father of Humanity"): Asserts his primary role in the procreation and creation of mortal human beings, as explicitly recorded in the Epic of Kirta (KTU 1.14)6.
• Bny Bnwt ("Creator of Created Things" or "Progenitor of Creatures"): Establishes El as the ultimate cosmic generator from whom all existence originates6.
• Tṣr ʾIl ("Bull El"): Symbolizes his procreative power, physical strength, spiritual vitality, and paternal authority over the divine assembly7.
• Mlk ("King"): Designates his formal status as the enthroned sovereign over the council of deities1.

A critical methodological distinction must be maintained between what is explicitly recorded on the Ugaritic tablets and what scholars reconstruct from fragmentary mythic narratives. Explicitly attested in texts such as the Epic of Kirta (KTU 1.14) and the Baal Cycle (KTU 1.1–1.6) is El's judicial supremacy: no subordinate deity can construct a royal palace, claim earthly kingship, or execute major cosmic initiatives without seeking El's formal permission and decree (tʿm)1. Furthermore, tablet KTU 1.114 explicitly records El hosting a divine banquet (mrzḥ) in his palace, where he drinks wine to extreme intoxication, experiences visions, and collapses in his own excrement, requiring assistance from minor deities such as Thukamuna and Shunama4. This proves that Ugaritic theology did not view El as an abstract, unchangeable sovereign, but as an anthropomorphic, corporeal patriarch who embodied both supreme judicial majesty and physical vulnerability5. Reconstructed mythology includes theoretical models regarding El's alleged political decline or "otioseness" (idleness). Earlier twentieth-century scholars hypothesized that El was a fading deity being displaced by the energetic storm-god Baal Hadad. Epigraphic re-evaluations by scholars such as Mark S. Smith demonstrate that El never lost his ultimate sovereign status at Ugarit1. While Baal exercised active governance over rain, storm weather, and seasonal agricultural fertility, he remained subordinate to El's royal authority1. El ruled the assembly of gods (ʿdt ʾil), served as supreme judge, and remained the divine father from whom executive legitimacy flowed1.

The Divine Designation Elyon and Historical Attestation

The term ʾElyon (Hebrew: עֶלְיוֹן; Ugaritic: ʿly; Phoenician/Aramaic: ʿlyn) functions grammatically as an adjectival modifier meaning "High," "Upper," or "Most High"2. In Northwest Semitic epigraphy and ancient literature, its occurrence as an independent proper name versus an adjectival title varies across geographical regions and chronological eras2. The epigraphic and literary evidence for Elyon spans three primary domains:

1. Aramaic Royal Inscriptions: The earliest extra-biblical epigraphic attestation of Elyon occurs in the mid-eighth century BCE Aramaic treaty stelae from Sefire (near Aleppo, Syria; KAI 222–224)2. In Sefire I (Face A, line 11), the treaty invokes divine witnesses in paired sequences, including the phrase ʾl wʿlyn ("El and Elyon")2. Epigraphers debate whether ʾl wʿlyn denotes two separate, distinct deities ("El and Elyon") joined by a copulative waw, or a hendiadys forming a single divine title ("El, the Most High")2. If read as two distinct entities, it confirms that in eighth-century North Syria, Elyon was remembered or worshipped as a divine figure alongside El2. If read as a single title, it proves the integration of the epithet into El's formal nomenclature20.

2. Classical Literary Accounts: In the Hellenistic-Roman period, Philo of Byblos (c. 64–141 CE), claiming to translate the ancient Phoenician history written by Sanchuniathon (allegedly pre-Trojan War), recorded a detailed euhemeristic Phoenician cosmogony preserved in Eusebius's Praeparatio Evangelica (1.10.15–29)14. Philo explicitly distinguishes between Elioun (designated Hypsistos, "the Most High") and Elus (also identified as Cronus, representing the supreme god El)14. According to Philo's narrative, Elioun and his wife Berouth lived near Byblos and fathered Epigeius (Ouranos/Sky) and Ge (Earth); Elioun was subsequently killed in an encounter with wild beasts and deified14. Generations later, Elus/Cronus emerged as a distinct ruler who deposed Ouranos14. While Philo's account reflects Hellenistic Roman-era euhemerism and thematic borrowing from Hesiodic theogony, it preserves a West Semitic tradition where Elioun had an independent mythic history separate from El14.

3. Biblical Textual Attestations: In the Hebrew Bible, Elyon occurs both as an independent title ("the Most High") and as an epithet compounded with other divine names, including El Elyon (Genesis 14:18–22) and Yahweh Elyon (Psalm 7:17, Psalm 47:2)2. In Genesis 14:18–22, Melchizedek, king of Salem, is introduced as the "priest of El Elyon" (kohen le-ʿEl ʿElyon), who blesses Abram by "El Elyon, Creator of Heaven and Earth" (ʿEl ʿElyon qoneh shamayim va-aretz)13. Abram identifies his own God with this title, declaring he raises his hand to "Yahweh, El Elyon"20.

Structure of the Ugaritic Divine Family and Regional Pantheons

Analysis of Ugaritic ritual texts, sacrifice lists (e.g., KTU 1.47, 1.118), and mythological cycles reveals a structured four-tiered hierarchy governing the West Semitic divine family1. This cosmic administration mirrored the political and kinship structures of Bronze Age earthly royal courts1. At the apex of the Ugaritic pantheon sat Tier 1, occupied exclusively by the sovereign royal couple: El, the supreme patriarch and monarch, and Athirat (biblical Asherah), the queen mother and lady of the sea1. Together, they formed the authoritative pair who ratified divine decrees and procreated the remaining pantheon1. Tier 2 comprised the active royal deities who managed the dynamic forces of the cosmos under El's ultimate judicial sovereignty1. This group included Baal Hadad (the storm king and lord of rain), Anat and Astarte (goddesses of war, love, and hunting), Yam (god of the chaotic sea), Mot (personification of death and sterility), and Resheph (god of plague and fire)1. These deities engaged in active struggles for terrestrial dominion, yet all were required to seek El's approval for royal palace construction and formal royal status1. Tier 3 consisted of specialist and craft deities who provided technical expertise to the higher gods1. The primary figure in this category was Kothar-wa-Khasis ("Skillful and Wise"), the divine architect and craftsman who forged magical weapons for Baal and constructed divine palaces, alongside the Kotharat, a group of birth-goddesses who presided over human conception and royal lineage1. Tier 4 occupied the base of the hierarchy, housing messenger and servant deities1. Exemplified by Gupan and Ugar (the dual messengers of Baal), these entities lacked administrative autonomy and functioned solely to convey decrees between higher gods, serve at divine banquets, or execute executive commands across cosmic realms1.

Religious practice varied across West Semitic urban centers1. At Ugarit, Baal Hadad occupied a prominent role due to the maritime coastal city's dependence on seasonal rain and maritime stability1. In inland urban centers such as Byblos, Sidon, Tyre, and Damascus, local patron deities like Melqart (Tyre), Eshmun (Sidon), or Hadad (Damascus) assumed distinct regional roles13. Consequently, the ancient Levant did not maintain a single standardized pantheon, but rather shared an underlying West Semitic conceptual structure—specifically the supreme authority of El, the divine family, and council administration—tailored to local ecological and political realities1.

Comparative Chronology of Ugarit and Ancient Israel

The development of ancient West Semitic religious systems spans more than fifteen centuries, transitioning from Late Bronze Age Ugaritic polytheism to the post-exilic emergence of monotheism in Judah2.

Geographical Mapping of Ancient West Semitic Cult Centers

To understand the geographical distribution of West Semitic religious traditions, key cultic and epigraphic sites across the Levant must be evaluated1.

Yahweh in the West Semitic Context and Divine Council Dynamics

Unlike El, Baal, and Athirat, Yahweh does not appear in Late Bronze Age Ugaritic mythological or ritual texts1. Theoretical attempts to identify Yahweh in isolated, broken Ugaritic fragments (such as yw in KTU 1.1 IV 14\) have been widely rejected by modern epigraphers as philologically unsustainable13. The earliest extra-biblical attestations of Yahweh appear in Egyptian New Kingdom topographical lists from the reign of Amenhotep III (fourteenth century BCE) and Ramesses II (thirteenth century BCE) at Soleb and Amrah West, which reference t3 š3sw jhw3 ("The Land of the Shasu \[nomads\] of Yhw")13. This geographical designation places the earliest worship of Yahweh in the arid southern desert regions of Seir, Edom, Paran, and Midian—a geographic origin preserved in the archaic poetic layers of the Hebrew Bible13:

• "Yahweh came from Sinai and dawned from Seir upon us; he shone forth from Mount Paran" (Deuteronomy 33:2).
• "Yahweh, when you went out from Seir, when you marched from the region of Edom, the earth trembled" (Judges 5:4).
• "God (Eloah) came from Teman, the Holy One from Mount Paran" (Habakkuk 3:3).

This geographical data forms the foundation of the Midianite-Kenite Hypothesis, which posits that Yahweh was originally a southern storm and desert deity adopted by proto-Israelite highland tribes and integrated into the central highland religious system, where El was already worshipped as the supreme deity13. The structural relationship between Elyon, El, Yahweh, and the divine assembly is preserved in three biblical passages when evaluated alongside comparative Ugaritic council texts1. In the archaic Hebrew text of Deuteronomy 32:8–9, a textual tradition is preserved that reveals a hierarchical division of cosmic authority7. The text reconstructed from the Dead Sea Scrolls (4QDeutʲ) and supported by the Septuagint (LXX) records that when the Most High (ʿElyon) divided mankind and gave nations their inheritance, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the "sons of God" (bne ʾElohim / bne ʾEl)7. Yahweh's specific portion was defined as his people, Jacob being his allotted heritage7. By contrast, the medieval Masoretic Text (MT) modified "sons of God" to "sons of Israel" (bne Yisraʾel)25. Textual critics agree that 4QDeutʲ preserves the original reading25. The reading "sons of Israel" represents a deliberate scribal revision introduced to eliminate the polytheistic implication that the high god Elyon distributed world governance among a council of divine beings, of whom Yahweh received Israel as his personal allotment13. In this ancient tradition, Elyon acts as the supreme monarch distributing territory, while Yahweh functions as one of the subordinate divine sons receiving his individual national domain7. Psalm 82 presents a dramatic scene of divine judicial judgment that documents the transition from a divine council model to radical monolatry7. The text describes God (ʾElohim) taking his place in the divine council (ʿadat ʾEl) to hold judgment among the gods (ʾelohim)7. The opening line explicitly uses the Ugaritic technical term for the supreme divine council: ʿadat ʾEl (identical to Ugaritic ʿdt ʾil)1. In verse 1, Yahweh/Elohim stands up within the assembly—a posture indicating a prosecutorial figure rather than the presiding monarch—and condemns the national guardian deities (bne ʿElyon) for failing to execute justice for the poor and oppressed7. He strips these subordinate gods of their immortality and sentences them to die like mortals, effectively dissolving the traditional divine assembly and assuming direct global sovereignty over all nations7. Psalm 89 reflects an intermediate theological stage where Yahweh is elevated above all other divine beings within the heavenly council13. Asking who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh or who among the heavenly beings (bne ʾElim) is like Yahweh, the text describes him as a God greatly to be feared in the council of the holy ones (sod qedosim)13. Here, the members of the old pantheon are retained as a "council of holy ones," but their independent power is stripped; they serve as an awestruck court surrounding Yahweh, who has absorbed the sovereign attributes of El1. In Ugaritic mythology, the divine sons of El and his consort Athirat are explicitly defined as seventy in number13. A phrase in the Baal Cycle, sbm bn ʾatrt ("seventy sons of Athirat"; KTU 1.4 VI 46), establishes that the procreative yield of the sovereign royal pair constituted the complete body of governing cosmic deities13. This numerical tradition directly informs the biblical worldview13. Genesis 10 outlines the "Table of Nations," enumerating precisely seventy foreign nations descending from Noah's sons13. When read alongside Deuteronomy 32:8–9 (4QDeutʲ), the conceptual parallel becomes clear: Elyon partitioned humanity into seventy distinct nations, matching the number of the seventy divine sons (bne ʾElohim)7. Each divine son was assigned as a patron ruler over a specific nation, while Yahweh claimed Jacob/Israel7. This framework persisted into later Jewish apocalyptic and rabbinic literature, where the seventy gods of the West Semitic assembly were reinterpreted as seventy patron angels presiding over the seventy nations of the earth (e.g., 1 Enoch 89:59; Targum Pseudo-Jonathan on Deut 32:8; Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 88b)13. From a sociological and historical perspective, the divine assembly functioned as a projection of earthly governance onto the cosmic realm1. The structure of the Ugaritic and Israelite councils closely mirrored Bronze Age royal courts, complete with a supreme king, royal family members, executive ministers, craft specialists, and messengers1. While modern alternative-history theories speculate that divine councils represent ancient encounters with physical nonhuman intelligences or extra-terrestrial visitors, critical academic analysis demonstrates that the council model is fully explained by sociological projection1. Human political hierarchies and kinship systems were metaphorically reflected onto the heavens to explain cosmic administration, seasonal weather cycles, and international political boundaries1.

Historical Mechanisms of El–Yahweh Convergence and Syncretism

The process by which Yahweh absorbed the identities, epithets, and mythic attributes of El and Elyon constitutes a well-documented historical phenomenon: syncretic convergence1. Rather than representing a sudden theological fabrication, this process unfolded over centuries through five distinct historical mechanisms1. Direct theological identification served as the primary initial mechanism13. Proto-Israelite tribes settling in the central highlands already revered El as the supreme local deity, as evidenced by the name Isra-el ("El strives" or "May El rule")13. Rather than outlawing El worship, early religious leaders declared that the southern desert deity Yahweh was none other than El himself under a newly revealed personal name13. This explicit theological strategy is documented in Exodus 6:2–3, where God informs Moses that he appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as El Shaddai, but was not known to them by his personal name Yahweh26. Epithet assimilation and literary synthesis provided a second mechanism1. As Yahweh became the dominant deity of Israel and Judah, he systematically absorbed the titles, liturgical formulas, and cosmic attributes of older Canaanite deities1. From El, Yahweh acquired the titles El Elyon ("God Most High"), El Shaddai ("God of the Mountain/Steppe"), and Qoneh Aratz ("Creator of the Earth")13. From Baal Hadad, Yahweh absorbed storm-god imagery, including riding upon the clouds (rokeb ba-ʿarabot; cf. Ugaritic rkb ʿqrt), wielding thunderbolts, and battling the chaotic primeval sea monster Leviathan/Tannin (cf. Ugaritic Ltn / Tunnanu)1. Political centralization and monolatrous elevation acted as a third mechanism5. The rise of the Davidic monarchy and the establishment of the Jerusalem Temple centralized political and cultic authority5. To unify diverse tribal factions worshipping different patron deities, royal theologians elevated Yahweh to the supreme head of the state pantheon5. Secondary gods were reinterpreted as Yahweh's heavenly court, while Asherah's role as divine queen was reduced to a cultic symbol (the asherah pole) beside Yahweh's altar, as documented at Kuntillet 'Ajrud and Khirbet el-Qom13. Geographical southern migration and cultic fusion formed the fourth mechanism13. Trade networks and military movements between Edom, Midian, the Negev, and the central highlands facilitated the northern movement of Yahwism13. Shrine sites like Kuntillet 'Ajrud serve as material evidence of this fusion, where inscriptions combine the southern desert title "Yahweh of Teman" with the northern monarchic title "Yahweh of Samaria," showing how regional cults merged into a unified tradition27. Redactional polemic and divine council deposition formed the fifth mechanism7. During the late monarchic and exilic periods, Israelite writers engaged in deliberate theological polemics designed to dismantle surrounding polytheistic structures7. Passages like Psalm 82 reinterpreted the traditional divine council, declaring that non-Israelite gods were stripped of divinity and doomed to die7. This transformed Israelite religion from monolatry (worshipping one god among many) to strict monotheism (asserting that only one God exists)11. Similar processes of divine fusion are widely documented throughout the ancient Near East and Mediterranean7. In New Kingdom Egypt, the local deity Amun was merged with the ancient sun god Re to form Amun-Re, acquiring universal creator attributes while retaining distinct origins7. In Iron Age Aram, Hadad was combined with Rimmon to form Hadad-Rimmon (Zechariah 12:11)7. In Hellenistic Syria and Phoenicia, local storm and sky gods were routinely synthesized with classical Greek deities, producing compound cults such as Zeus-Helios or Zeus-Adad38. These parallels demonstrate that a deity could routinely acquire another's epithets, family relationships, and cosmic functions without being originally identical7.

Comparative Synthesis of West Semitic Divine Entities

To evaluate the original distinctness and subsequent synthesis of West Semitic deities, the following evidence matrix synthesizes epigraphic, textual, and historical data across the five primary divine entities1.

Comparative Cosmology and Cosmic Order

The cosmological models of ancient Ugarit and early Israel share a common West Semitic worldview regarding primeval origins, spatial geography, and divine administration, while diverging on ultimate divine governance1.

Candidate Documentary Artifact Catalog

The following catalog identifies ten physical artifacts and textual discoveries essential for reconstructing the history of El, Elyon, Yahweh, and the West Semitic divine family3.

Synthesis of Findings and Certainty Assessment

The following findings summarize the historical, epigraphic, and textual research regarding El, Elyon, Yahweh, and West Semitic religion1.

Historical Plausibility and Missing Evidence Assessment

The ancient Canaanite and West Semitic evidence provides a historically credible, highly plausible framework for interpreting El Elyon and Yahweh as originally distinct divine identities1. The convergence of epigraphic, textual, and comparative data supports this historical reconstruction1. El was the supreme patriarch of the Canaanite central highlands and northern Levant (Ugarit, Byblos, Syria) during the Late Bronze Age1. Yahweh emerged from the southern arid desert zones (Edom, Seir, Midian, Paran), bearing storm and desert warrior attributes absent from El's venerable character13. Furthermore, archaic poetic texts like Deuteronomy 32:8–9 (4QDeutʲ) explicitly preserve a polytheistic layer where Elyon acts as the supreme administrative monarch dividing humanity among seventy divine sons, while Yahweh functions as one of these subordinate sons who receives Israel as his allotment7. Passages like Psalm 82 record Yahweh rising within the divine assembly of El (ʿadat ʾEl) to condemn foreign patron gods (bne ʿElyon) and assume universal executive control over the earth7. Finally, the Hebrew Bible itself acknowledges this theological fusion in Exodus 6:2–3, explicitly stating that the God of Israel was previously known to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as El Shaddai, but was only later identified by the personal name Yahweh26. While this historical reconstruction is supported by biblical textual criticism and comparative West Semitic epigraphy, critical gaps in the primary evidence prevent treating this hypothesis as fully established history1:

• Absence of Midianite / Edomite Textual Archives: No extensive Late Bronze or Iron I textual archives have been recovered from Edom, Midian, or Seir. Without indigenous southern epigraphic records documenting Yahweh's early character and his relationships to El or Elyon prior to his arrival in the central highlands, Yahweh's early southern history remains partially reconstructed from Egyptian lists and later biblical poetry13.
• Epigraphic Ambiguity of Aramaic and Phoenician Inscriptions: The critical extra-biblical phrase ʾl wʿlyn on the Sefire I Stele (mid-8th c. BCE) can be translated either as two distinct deities ("El and Elyon") or as a single compound divine title ("El, the Most High")2. Until a West Semitic inscription is discovered that clearly narrates an explicit mythic interaction or familial relationship between El and Elyon in an early Bronze or Iron Age context, Elyon's status as a fully independent deity prior to the first millennium BCE remains an unproven hypothesis2.
• Lack of Proto-Israelite Highland Texts: Archaeological excavations in the central highlands of Canaan (the territorial core of early Israel) have produced pottery, architecture, and settlement patterns, but no native written mythic archives from the twelfth to tenth centuries BCE. Textual evidence for early Israelite theology relies on later biblical traditions preserved through generations of scribal copying and theological redaction5.

Consequently, while the historical distinction and subsequent syncretic convergence of El Elyon and Yahweh represents the most coherent academic model for explaining biblical and epigraphic data, its absolute historical confirmation awaits future epigraphic discoveries in the Southern Levant and Northern Arabia1.

Works cited

1. An Analysis of the Function of Yahweh in the Divine Council of, https\://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1143\&context=masters

2. God, Names of \- Encyclopedia.com, https\://www\.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/god-names

3. File:Baal Ugarit Louvre AO17329.jpg \- Wikimedia Commons, https\://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baal\_Ugarit\_Louvre\_AO17329.jpg

4. Marzeah Papyrus \- Grokipedia, https\://grokipedia.com/page/marzeah\_papyrus

5. Kandidatuppsats (Slutliga versionen) \- Lund University Publications, https\://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9219565/file/9219566.pdf

6. Když Bůh mluví ve snu: Zploď syna, proslav svůj dům, zbuduj chrám, https\://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/206867/120532461.pdf?sequence=1

7. The Most Heiser: Yahweh and Elyon in Psalm 82 and Deuteronomy 32, http\://religionatthemargins.com/2011/07/the-most-heiser-yahweh-and-elyon-in-psalm-82-and-deuteronomy-32

8. FILLETS OF FATLING AND GOBLETS OF GOLD \- dokumen.pub, https\://dokumen.pub/download/fillets-of-fatling-and-goblets-of-gold-the-use-of-meal-events-in-the-ritual-imagery-in-the-ugaritic-mythological-and-epic-texts-9781463216139.html

9. Nursing a Hangover in the Biblical World, https\://www\.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/nursing-hangover-in-biblical-world/

10. The Marzeah Festival and the Judgment of Israel in Amos 6:4–7, https\://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058\&context=apms

11. the divine council in late canonical and \- SciSpace, https\://scispace.com/pdf/the-divine-council-in-late-canonical-and-non-canonical-4ba39rzk77.pdf

12. There is evidence of a strong polytheistic background in the Bible, https\://www\.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/oqqk7s/there\_is\_evidence\_of\_a\_strong\_polytheistic/

13. The Evolution of Yahweh: Archaeology, Polytheism, and ... \- Medium, https\://medium.com/@greyslayer76\_59122/the-evolution-of-yahweh-archaeology-polytheism-and-the-question-of-gods-existence-4ebc4cf6e220

14. Elyon \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elyon

15. Elyon עליון \- Brill \- Reference Works, https\://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/DDDO/DDDO-Elyon.xml

16. Chapter 1 Divine Witnesses in Greece and Anatolia: Iliad 3.276–280, https\://brill.com/display/book/9789004508828/BP000002.xml?language=en

17. Sefire steles \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sefire\_steles

18. Contract Allies in: Vetus Testamentum Volume 76 Issue 3 (2026) \- Brill, https\://brill.com/view/journals/vt/76/3/article-p336\_3.xml?language=en

19. AncientIndo-European LanguagesbetweenLinguistics andPhilology, https\://www\.changeprin.it/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=upload\_old:bianconi\_divinewi\_2022\_pub.pdf

20. el elyon \- Medium, https\://medium.com/yahweh-elyon-yeshuas-teachings/el-elyon-c9fd74fd856

21. Elyon עליון \- Brill \- Reference Works, https\://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/DDDO/DDDO-Elyon.xml?language=en

22. Lucian, Philo of Byblos, and Ps.-Meliton JL Lightfoot, https\://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7bbd17ac-1e35-4d10-a324-f17cae5c5bc9/files/rf4752h476

23. Olden Gods \- Brill \- Reference Works, https\://referenceworks.brill.com/doi/10.1163/2589-7802\_DDDO\_DDDO\_Oldengods

24. the social memory of Melkiedeq through the Second Temple Period., https\://iro.uiowa.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01IOWA\_INST\&filePid=13730830320002771\&download=true

25. Deuteronomy 32:8 \- The BAS Library \- Biblical Archaeology Society, https\://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/sidebar/deuteronomy-328/

26. Biblical Contradiction \#27. Are Yahweh and El the same god or not?, http\://contradictionsinthebible.com/are-yahweh-and-el-the-same-god/

27. Kuntillet Ajrud inscriptions \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuntillet\_Ajrud\_inscriptions

28. Ancient Damascus: A historical study of the Syrian city-state from, https\://dokumen.pub/ancient-damascus-a-historical-study-of-the-syrian-city-state-from-earliest-times-until-its-fall-to-the-assyrians-in-732-bce-0931464242-0931464277-0931464250.html

29. the divine council in late canonical and \- LU Faculty SHARE, https\://facultyshare.liberty.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/40214537/fulltext.pdf

30. A Response to Michael Heiser concerning the LDS Use of Psalm 82, https\://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1702\&context=msr

31. Hand motif carved in the shape of a Hamsa at Khirbet el-Qom, https\://www\.reddit.com/r/ArtefactPorn/comments/1x7hbe1/hand\_motif\_carved\_in\_the\_shape\_of\_a\_hamsa\_at/

32. Arrowhead \| The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, https\://www\.imj.org.il/en/collections/375512-0

33. Bottle \| The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, https\://www\.imj.org.il/en/collections/375285-0

34. Balaam Son of Beor Inscription Discovery \| PDF \- Scribd, https\://www\.scribd.com/document/721954691/Book-of-Balaam-Son-of-Beor-Inscription-at-Tell-Deir-Alla

35. The Prophet Who Wasn't Only Biblical: What the Deir 'Alla Inscription, https\://medium.com/@misaampolskij/the-prophet-who-wasnt-only-biblical-what-the-deir-alla-inscription-tells-us-about-balaam-372a1225213d

36. Dead Sea Scrolls and New Testament Insights \| PDF \- Scribd, https\://www\.scribd.com/document/752294796/The-Dead-Sea-Scrolls-and-the-New-Testament

37. The Current State of Ugaritic Studies \| The Ancient Near East Today, https\://anetoday.org/ugaritic-levant-writing/

38. God as Chronos in Philo, Quod Deus Sit Immutabilis 30ff \- Page 3, https\://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8077\&start=20

39. 2014 \- Biblical Archaeology, https\://biblicalarchaeologygraves.blogspot.com/2014/

40. Fragments from the Book of Balaam Found at Deir Alla, https\://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/fragments-from-the-book-of-balaam-found-at-deir-alla/

41. Israelite Inscriptions from the Time of Jeremiah and Lehi, https\://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4653\&context=facpub

42. IVORIES FROM THE NORTH WEST PALACE (1845-1992), https\://www\.bisi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/publications/IN6\_book.pdf

43. figurine \- Louvre site des collections, https\://collections.louvre.fr/en/ark:/53355/cl010144161

44. On the Appearance of Royal Inscriptions in Alphabetic Scripts in the, https\://www\.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/MAR201923207