Report 3 — The Person and the Description: An AMIAN Theory of Identity

Full report

On this page

Introduction: The Ontological Gap Between Map and Territory

The central proposition of the AMIAN theory of identity is deceptively simple: a description of a person is not the person. Grounded in the rich semantic tradition of Alfred Korzybski, who famously observed that "the map is not the territory," AMIANISM asserts that human identity suffers an ontological violation when an individual is conflated with the symbols, texts, and metrics used to represent them1. Language and bureaucratic records serve as necessary maps that allow society to navigate complex interpersonal and institutional terrain. However, just as an anatomical diagram removes unnecessary details to function as a medical guide, societal records inherently strip away the profound complexities of human existence to function as instruments of categorization2. The danger arises when the map is confused for the territory it describes, a fallacy of misplaced concreteness that replaces the living subject with a static, historical artifact3. This report establishes the major philosophical and sociological treatment of personal identity within the AMIAN framework. At its core, AMIANISM stands in fierce opposition to what we term "identity foreclosure." In developmental psychology, particularly within the framework of James Marcia and Erik Erikson, identity foreclosure denotes a state wherein an individual commits to an identity—often inherited from parents or dictated by societal expectations—without undergoing the necessary crisis of active exploration5. AMIANISM expands this psychological concept into a sociological and political critique, arguing that modern institutions forcibly impose identity foreclosure upon individuals. By treating historical information as though it permanently finishes the definition of a person, systems of power artificially arrest human development. To take this simple proposition extremely seriously requires a rigorous examination of identity across time, the imperative of temporal context for all records, and a deep exploration of eight critical dialectics that define the human experience. Furthermore, it demands a robust confrontation with the problem of moral accountability, definitively establishing that the perpetual revisability of identity does not grant an individual the right to falsify their past or escape the consequences of their actions.

Part I: The Metaphysics of Identity Across Time

To understand why a description cannot equate to a person, one must interrogate the nature of identity across time. Who is the person recorded twenty years ago? Who is the person today? How much continuity truly exists, which changes matter, and ultimately, who holds the authority to decide the parameters of that identity?

The Process of Becoming versus the Stasis of Substance

Traditional Western philosophy has often relied on a substance ontology, presuming a static, enduring "self" that merely accumulates experiences over time while remaining fundamentally unchanged at its core. AMIANISM rejects this in favor of a process ontology, drawing heavily on the metaphysics of Alfred North Whitehead. In Whitehead's cosmological framework, reality is not composed of inert material substances but of momentary energetic events, or "actual occasions"8. Identity is a continuous, dynamic process of becoming, where "the many become one, and are increased by one"9. Under a process paradigm, the person of twenty years ago is not identical to the person of today3. The individual is a historic route of successive perspectives, inheriting the past but perpetually transcending it through the integration of novel experiences11. The person recorded two decades ago was an actual occasion that has since perished, objectively immortalized in the causal chain but entirely distinct from the subjective, living immediacy of the person today11. A record, therefore, captures a ghost. It documents an entity that no longer exists in the exact state recorded. To insist that the present self is utterly defined by a past record is to deny the fundamental metaphysical reality of change.

Psychological Continuity and Connectedness

This temporal distance is further illuminated by Derek Parfit's reductionist views on personal identity. Parfit distinguishes between psychological continuity (the overlapping chain of psychological states extending through time) and psychological connectedness (the direct psychological links, such as memory and intention, between a past and present self)13. While a person today is continuous with the person they were twenty years ago, the degree of direct connectedness may be vanishingly weak13. The beliefs, desires, and cognitive frameworks that drove an individual's behavior two decades ago may have entirely dissipated. When institutions retrieve a decades-old record and utilize it to judge an individual's present character, they operate under the false assumption of strong psychological connectedness. They presume that the motives of the past remain the motives of the present. AMIANISM argues that because psychological connectedness diminishes over time, the relevance and definitional authority of historical records must correspondingly diminish.

The Authority of the Observer versus the Subject

If the self is continuously shifting, who possesses the authority to decide which changes matter and who the person ultimately is? Thomas Nagel, in The View from Nowhere, identifies the profound tension between the subjective perspective (how it feels to be a specific person navigating the world) and the objective perspective (an external, impersonal view of that same person)15. Records operate almost entirely from the objective, external standpoint. They seek to quantify, measure, and define the individual from "nowhere," entirely missing the subjective continuities and discontinuities of the individual's actual mental life16. Authority over identity, AMIANISM concludes, must fundamentally reside with the subject. While external objective facts (e.g., "this event occurred") belong to the historical record, the interpretation of those facts, their ongoing relevance, and their integration into the present self must remain the sovereign domain of the individual.

Part II: The Imperative of Temporal Context

Because human beings are entities of continuous becoming, AMIANISM dictates an absolute principle for all data governance, social judgment, and institutional memory: records require temporal context. Modern society has evolved into what Marion Fourcade and Kieran Healy term an "ordinal society," wherein individuals are perpetually sorted, slotted, and ranked into classification situations based on their digital, financial, and behavioral histories18. The primary weapon of the ordinal society is the "data double"—a composite profile constructed from surveillance and institutional data that circulates independently of the physical person, determining their access to capital, employment, and societal participation21. A record captures something at a particular time and under particular conditions. When society extracts these localized artifacts and grants them permanent definitional power, it engineers identity foreclosure. To illustrate the breadth of this crisis, we must examine the specific mechanics of various record types and their temporal distortions.

The devastating consequences of ignoring temporal context are most starkly visible in the criminal justice system. Sociologist Devah Pager's research, The Mark of a Criminal Record, empirically demonstrated how a criminal history functions as a permanent negative credential, slicing employer callback rates in half and effectively barring individuals from the labor market indefinitely23. This stigma is heavily racialized, combining with systemic biases to create insurmountable barriers to reentry25. AMIANISM aligns philosophically with the "Clean Slate" legislative movement, which advocates for the automated expungement of non-violent criminal records after a period of crime-free behavior27. Automated expungement is the legal manifestation of temporal context: it formally acknowledges that after sufficient time has passed, the past behavior no longer serves as an accurate or just predictor of the present person29.

Part III: The Eight Dialectics of the Amian Theory

To deepen the philosophical framework of AMIANISM, the theory explores eight dialectical tensions that govern the relationship between the individual and the forces that seek to define them.

3.1 Self-Description versus External Description

The conflict between how one understands oneself and how one is classified by institutions is central to the politics of identity. Philosopher Ian Hacking highlights the phenomenon of "looping effects" in human classifications31. Unlike natural kinds (e.g., gold or water), which remain indifferent to how they are categorized, "human kinds" are acutely aware of their classifications31. When an institution creates a new external description—such as a psychiatric diagnosis or a sociological label—the individuals assigned to that category internalize it, alter their behavior to fit the label, and ultimately change the nature of the classification itself31. While external descriptions can be useful administrative tools, they possess an inherent danger of epistemic injustice. When clinical or institutional assessments are prioritized over the individual's internal lived experience, the person is reduced to an object of taxonomy35. AMIANISM insists on the primacy of self-description. External descriptions must be recognized as contingent, utilitarian maps, whereas self-description remains the authentic articulation of the territory.

3.2 Chosen versus Inherited Identity

In Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, Amartya Sen argues that much of global conflict is driven by the false presumption that individuals possess a singular, supreme, and inherited identity (such as religion, race, or nationality) that overrides all other affiliations37. This "illusion of destiny" allows political actors to martial people into homogenous, violent factions38. Similarly, Kwame Anthony Appiah's The Ethics of Identity emphasizes that the modern moral project is about forging one's own path, asserting identity defiantly rather than passively accepting the categories dictated by birth40. AMIANISM vehemently opposes the foreclosure of the individual through inherited categorizations. The right to become requires that chosen identities—the affiliations and values a person actively selects and cultivates—take precedence over the unchosen accidents of geography, genetics, and historical bloodlines.

3.3 Behavior versus Character

Institutional records operate on the assumption that a recorded behavior is a direct and permanent window into a person's character. Philosophical situationism, as developed by John Doris and Gilbert Harman, fundamentally dismantles this assumption41. Drawing on robust social psychology data, situationists argue that human behavior is far more dependent on immediate situational factors (stress, environment, social pressure) than on robust, cross-situational character traits41. If "character" is highly localized, then extrapolating a permanent identity from an isolated behavioral record is scientifically and philosophically invalid44. A single failure to act compassionately, or a single lapse in judgment, does not render a person intrinsically vicious, just as a single success does not render them eternally virtuous43. AMIANISM separates the behavior (the event in time) from the character (the enduring self). A record only captures the former; it has no empirical right to assert the latter.

3.4 Identity versus Affiliation

The digital era blurs the line between who a person is (identity) and the groups or ideologies they temporarily associate with (affiliation). Digital surveillance and social media profiles incentivize individuals to lock themselves into tribal algorithms, generating meta-identities based on hyper-specific affiliations18. AMIANISM maintains a strict conceptual firewall between identity and affiliation. Affiliations are tools for social engagement, political action, and intellectual exploration; they are meant to be donned and discarded as the individual evolves. When society treats a past affiliation (a political donation, a social media "like," a membership in a controversial group) as an unalterable definition of the core identity, it paralyzes intellectual and social mobility. The person must always remain conceptually larger than the sum of their affiliations.

3.5 Memory versus Record

The human relationship to the past is inherently dualistic: we possess biological memory, and we possess externalized records. In Archive Fever, Jacques Derrida observes that the archive is not merely a neutral container for memory; it actively structures, filters, and alters the memory it purports to save46. The act of archiving is driven by what Freud called the "death drive"—a desire to stabilize, freeze, and essentially kill the living, evolving nature of human memory to render it controllable47. Biological memory is reconstructive. It updates past experiences with present wisdom, allowing the individual to learn, heal, and contextualize trauma. The institutional record, conversely, is dead and spectral. It haunts the present without the capacity for self-reflection48. AMIANISM privileges the living memory over the dead record. The record must only exist as a subordinate tool, requiring the breath of living human context to grant it valid meaning.

3.6 Reputation versus Reality

How does a name connect to a person? Saul Kripke’s Naming and Necessity revolutionized the philosophy of language by defeating the descriptivist theory of reference49. Prior to Kripke, philosophers argued that a name was simply a bundle of descriptions (e.g., "Aristotle" means "the pupil of Plato and teacher of Alexander")50. Kripke argued that names are "rigid designators" that pick out the same individual across all possible worlds, regardless of whether the descriptions attached to them change or are proven false50. In the Amian framework, Kripke's logic separates reputation from reality. A person's reputation is merely a cluster of societal descriptions (records, rumors, credit scores, evaluations)50. The reality of the person—the rigid designator of their core self—exists entirely independent of these descriptions. A person’s identity remains intact and sovereign even if every institutional record describing them is fundamentally incorrect. The description is contingent; the person is necessary.

3.7 Prediction versus Destiny

The apotheosis of identity foreclosure is algorithmic prediction. Machine learning models, such as the COMPAS system used in the criminal justice system to predict recidivism, digest historical data to forecast future human behavior52. These algorithms frequently encode historical biases, operating on flawed datasets that conflate systemic disadvantage with individual criminality52. More insidiously, prediction masquerades as destiny. By assigning an individual a high-risk score, the algorithm influences judicial and institutional behavior in a way that actively manufactures the predicted outcome—a devastating algorithmic loop53. AMIANISM rejects the use of statistical aggregates to determine individual destiny. Because humans possess agency, creativity, and the capacity for spontaneous moral shifts, their future is empirically unwritten. To treat a predictive score as a finished destiny is an affront to human freedom.

3.8 Continuity versus Change

The ultimate tension lies in reconciling the profound changes a person undergoes with the feeling of continuous existence. Narrative identity theorists, like Marya Schechtman, argue that we constitute ourselves by weaving our past, present, and future into a coherent, authored story56. However, Galen Strawson, in Against Narrativity, argues that many individuals are naturally "Episodic." They live beautifully rich lives without feeling strongly connected to their deep past or distant future, viewing their past selves almost as strangers58. Institutions demand that everyone exist as a Diachronic, narrative subject. A job interview, a parole hearing, and a credit application all demand that the individual narrativize their life, explaining how past actions perfectly align with present reality57. AMIANISM defends the Episodic right. We must recognize that individuals can change so fundamentally that their continuity is strictly biological and legal, rather than psychological. A just society allows individuals to change their minds, alter their trajectories, and break the narrative arc without being accused of inauthenticity.

Part IV: The Anchor of Accountability and the Rejection of Falsification

A theory that aggressively defends the revisability of identity, dismantles the permanence of character, and demotes the authority of the historical record invites a profound and difficult counterargument. If identity is always fluid, and the past self is psychologically distant from the present self, can an individual simply escape accountability for their crimes, debts, or betrayals by declaring, “That isn't who I am anymore?” The Amian answer is an unequivocal no. Change does not erase consequences. The right to become is not a right to falsify the past. This distinction is the essential ethical anchor of the AMIAN theory.

4.1 The Objective Immortality of the Past

While the subjective experience of the self is in constant flux, the actions committed by that self are indelible facts of the universe. To borrow again from Whitehead, once an actual occasion has perished, it becomes "objectively immortal"61. It is a settled fact that exerts causal influence on the present9. If a person inflicted harm upon another, broke a contract, or committed a crime, the objective reality of the victim’s suffering and the tear in the social fabric remain, regardless of the perpetrator's subsequent psychological evolution. To deny that the event occurred, or to refuse to acknowledge one's role as the causal agent of that event, is to engage in historical falsification. The right to revise one's identity moving forward does not grant permission to gaslight reality or abdicate responsibility for historical truth.

4.2 The Principle of Custodianship

If the present self feels episodic—if they look back upon the person who committed the offense twenty years ago and feel they are looking at a stranger59—why must they bear the punishment? The answer lies in the principle of custodianship. The present iteration of the self is the sole biological, legal, and historical custodian of the past self's causal chain. Much like a newly appointed head of state cannot repudiate the sovereign debts incurred by their predecessor, the present self inherits the moral ledgers of their past iterations. We hold individuals accountable not necessarily because they possess the exact same psychological mindset they did during the transgression, but because accountability is the mechanism through which the present self addresses the debts of its history. As Antony Duff explores in Trials and Punishments, moral accountability is not merely an act of state retribution; it is a communicative enterprise designed to bring an offender to recognize the wrong they have done, facilitating repentance and reintegration62. The assertion "that isn't who I am anymore" is only valid if it is accompanied by the willingness to repair the damage caused by who one was. Accountability is the crucible through which authentic change is validated.

4.3 The Amian Synthesis: Finite Punishment, Infinite Becoming

The Amian framework resolves this tension by demanding a strict reciprocity between the individual and society. The individual must accept absolute accountability for their past actions, making restitution and facing the consequences without attempting to falsify history. In return, society must accept that punishment and record-keeping are finite. Identity foreclosure occurs when society demands permanent, unending punishment for a finite crime. Once a debt is paid, a sentence served, or accountability achieved, the record must be stripped of its power to dictate the future. Society must close the book. The Amian synthesis recognizes that we hold people rigorously accountable for what they have done precisely so they can earn the right to transcend it. True justice does not freeze a person in the moment of their worst transgression; it requires them to answer for it, and then steps aside to let them become.

Conclusion: The Horizon of the Amian Subject

To declare that a description of a person is not the person is to wage a necessary philosophical defense of the human soul against the encroaching architectures of data, surveillance, and algorithmic determinism. A résumé, a criminal record, a credit report, and a psychological assessment are merely maps. They are localized, temporally frozen approximations of a territory that is inherently dynamic, infinite, and alive. AMIANISM provides the metaphysical, sociological, and ethical vocabulary required to resist identity foreclosure. By integrating process ontology, we recognize that the person is an entity of continual becoming8. By applying semantic theory, we separate the reality of the individual from the shifting, often inaccurate bundle of descriptions society applies to them49. By acknowledging the looping effects of external labels and the dangers of algorithmic destiny, we protect the sovereign right of self-definition31. Yet, this absolute freedom to become is anchored by an uncompromising commitment to historical accountability. The individual remains the unbroken custodian of their past actions. We do not achieve a new identity by running from the past or falsifying the record, but by courageously confronting the consequences of our actions62. The Amian Theory of Identity ultimately demands a profound shift in how civilization manages human information. Records must be subordinated to time. Data must not dictate destiny. The description must always yield to the person. Only by recognizing the profound limitations of the archive can we safeguard the endless horizon of human potential, ensuring that the right to become remains the fundamental privilege of every living subject.

Works cited

1. RATIONALE OF THE IRRATIONAL | Skemman, https\://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/35165/5/MA\_Rationale%20of%20the%20Irrational.pdf

2. Language Is the invisible ceiling of human thought. : r/DeepThoughts, https\://www\.reddit.com/r/DeepThoughts/comments/1qjy4y0/language\_is\_the\_invisible\_ceiling\_of\_human\_thought/

3. Non-Identity & Non-Allness in General Semantics \- Academia.edu, https\://www\.academia.edu/34682650/Non\_Identity\_and\_Non\_Allness\_in\_General\_Semantics

4. When the Part Mirrors the Whole: Interactions Beyond “Simple, https\://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7862103/

5. Identity formation \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity\_formation

6. Identity Status Model: Pathways to Finding Yourself, https\://psychologyfanatic.com/marcias-identity-status-model/

7. Identity Formation: The Journey of Self-Discovery \- Psychology Fanatic, https\://psychologyfanatic.com/identity-formation/

8. Truth in the Making: On the Possibility of Metaphysics in a World-in, https\://footnotes2plato.com/2026/01/24/truth-in-the-making-on-the-possibility-of-metaphysics-in-a-world-in-process/

9. Process Philosophy and Exceptional Experience: Whitehead and, https\://www\.zygonjournal.org/article/id/27985/

10. Multiplicity and The Self : r/Jung \- Reddit, https\://www\.reddit.com/r/Jung/comments/p39r0f/multiplicity\_and\_the\_self/

11. Whitehead's Metaphysics as a Cosmological Framework for, https\://ctr4process.org/article/whiteheads-metaphysics-as-a-cosmological-framework-for-transpersonal-psychology/

12. Whitehead's Principle of Process \- Religion Online, https\://www\.religion-online.org/article/whiteheads-principle-of-process/

13. (PDF) Derek Parfit on Personal Identity: Relation-R and Moral, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/374928084\_Derek\_Parfit\_on\_Personal\_Identity\_Relation-R\_and\_Moral\_Commitments

14. Personal Identity and Ethics \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https\://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/identity-ethics/

15. How Nowhere Can You Get (and do Ethics)?, https\://www\.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/292920

16. The View From Nowhere PDF \- Bookey, https\://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/the-view-from-nowhere.pdf

17. The view from nowhere \- LSE, https\://personal.lse.ac.uk/ROBERT49/teaching/ph103/pdf/nagel1986.pdf

18. Classification Situations: Life-Chances in the Neoliberal era, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/259127091\_Classification\_Situations\_Life-Chances\_in\_the\_Neoliberal\_era

19. From the subprime to the premium, from California to fascism?, https\://www\.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17530350.2025.2523771

20. Housing, debt, and credit score classification situations, https\://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/755ea1a7-6b92-4e43-af46-23e52a3f980c/content

21. Notes on Incompleteness in Biometric Infrastructures \- Platypus, https\://blog.castac.org/2026/08/a-horse-in-the-archive-notes-on-incompleteness-in-biometric-infrastructures/

22. data double \- the social thinker, https\://thesocialthinker.wordpress.com/tag/data-double/

23. The Mark of a Criminal Record \- Office of Justice Programs, https\://www\.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/198320.pdf

24. The Mark of a Criminal Record \- University of Wisconsin–Madison, https\://users.ssc.wisc.edu/\~gwallace/Papers/Pager%20(2003).pdf

25. Investigating Prisoner Reentry: The Impact of Conviction Status on, https\://www\.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228584.pdf

26. MASS INCARCERATION, EX-FELON DISCRIMINATION, & BLACK, https\://www\.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/segall\_mass\_incarceration\_ex-felon\_discrimination\_and\_black\_labor\_market\_disadvantage.pdf

27. Advocacy Toolkit \- National Employment Law Project, https\://www\.nelp.org/app/uploads/2017/11/Clean-Slate-Advocacy-Toolkit.pdf

28. PAPER NO. 19-001 EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS, https\://gould.usc.edu/assets/docs/workshops-and-conferences/downloads/1000137.pdf

29. Safer Communities Through Second Chances: The Case for Federal, https\://rightoncrime.com/safer-communities-through-second-chances-the-case-for-federal-expungement/

30. Expungement of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical Study, https\://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=14327\&context=journal\_articles

31. (PDF) Hacking on the Looping Effects of Psychiatric Classifications, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/248961783\_Hacking\_on\_the\_Looping\_Effects\_of\_Psychiatric\_Classifications\_What\_Is\_an\_Interactive\_and\_Indifferent\_Kind

32. Kinds of People: Moving Targets \- The British Academy, https\://www\.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/2043/pba151p285.pdf

33. The role of clinicians in the looping effect: epistemic injustices and, https\://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12380643/

34. Embracing Social Media in Identity Exploration and Treatment, https\://encompass.eku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071\&context=psych\_doctorals

35. Psychological Testing Insights & Resources, https\://www\.sycamorecaps.com/blog

36. Psychiatric Diagnostic Classification System Based on New Forms, https\://www\.qeios.com/read/RSU5BD

37. Identity and Violence PDF \- Bookey, https\://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/identity-and-violence.pdf

38. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny Amartya Sen 2006, https\://www\.postcolonial.org/index.php/pct/article/download/807/501

39. Amartya Sen \- Identy & Violenice\_ : The illusing of Destiny \- Kyoo Lee, http\://www\.kyoolee.net/FRG\_Violence\_of\_Illusion\_IDENTITY\_AND\_VIOLENCE\_-\_Amartya\_Sen.pdf

40. From Principle American: The Immigrant Founders of America, https\://carnegie.org/article/from-principle-american-the-immigrant-founders-of-america/

41. The situationist critique of virtue ethics (Chapter 13), https\://www\.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-virtue-ethics/situationist-critique-of-virtue-ethics/AEE1CAE7E78A3DD0170F2B7D002FDF70

42. Character and Situation \- Tyler Lefevor, https\://tylerlefevor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/character-and-situation.pdf

43. Virtue Ethics vs. Situationism Debate | PDF \- Scribd, https\://www\.scribd.com/document/75173191/Virtue-Ethics-and-Social-Psychology

44. Ordinary Virtue \- Bates College, https\://www\.bates.edu/philosophy/files/2010/07/Res-Philosophica-Feb-2015-FINAL.pdf

45. Situationists such as John Doris (1998, 2002, 2005, 2 \- Jason D'Cruz, https\://jasondcruz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/trustandsituationismjapafinal.pdf

46. Archive Fever Chapter Summary | Jacques Derrida, https\://www\.bookey.app/book/archive-fever

47. Self-Preservation: Autobiography as a Form of Archivization as Seen, https\://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1226\&context=etd

48. The Future Performative: Staging the Body as Failure of the Archive, https\://gps.psi-web.org/article/view/35/34

49. \[Book Summary\] Naming and Necessity｜pairu \- note, https\://note.com/ready\_honest8301/n/n81a9aad86961?hl=en

50. Saul Kripke: Naming and Necessity \- Medium, https\://medium.com/@adecressac/7-saul-kripke-naming-and-necessity-f220bfb6ee18

51. Kripke: “Naming and Necessity”, https\://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/453/KripkeNamingDisplay.pdf

52. Role of dataset bias in ML :- Identifying, Measuring and Mitigating, https\://medium.com/@mraadilthim/role-of-dataset-bias-in-ml-identifying-measuring-and-mitigating-837682d947e0

53. Compas Risk Assessment Test, https\://sanandres.uep.edu.py/fetch.php/T8CFmR/705714/Compas%20Risk%20Assessment%20Test.pdf

54. Ethical AI Sentencing: A Framework for Moral Judgment in Criminal, https\://criticaldebateshsgj.scholasticahq.com/article/125464.pdf

55. Biased Algorithmic Risk Assessment in criminal justice settings, https\://www\.scielo.br/j/rbdpp/a/DHq43sYJzX9ZQtMjFhBQ8qM/?format=pdf\&lang=en

56. The Narrative Self: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review, https\://snakecult.net/posts/narrative-self-overview/

57. The Importance of Narrative Autonomy in the Narrative Self, https\://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/v118rk925

58. AGAINST NARRATIVITY Galen Strawson, https\://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/against\_narrativity.pdf

59. Galen Strawson against Narrativity \- Philosophical Reflections, http\://hauskeller.blogspot.com/2016/12/galen-strawson-against-narrativity.html

60. In Against Narrativity, the philosopher Galen Strawson challenges, https\://www\.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/1r85xqe/in\_against\_narrativity\_the\_philosopher\_galen/

61. Process and Reality \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process\_and\_Reality

62. Legal Punishment \- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https\://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/legal-punishment/