The Sociology of Sedition: Social Belonging, Collective Identity, and the Genesis of Revolutionary Attitudes

Full report

On this page

I. Executive Summary of Principal Findings and Confidence Levels

The etiology of revolutionary attitudes has historically been attributed either to the persuasive power of radical ideology or the acute pressure of material deprivation. However, an exhaustive independent investigation utilizing structural sociology, social psychology, network analysis, and comparative historical studies reveals a profoundly different causal architecture. The evidence indicates that revolutionary preferences are driven fundamentally by the human imperative for social belonging, collective identity, and the psychological rewards of network embeddedness.

To execute this investigation, revolutionary preference is defined strictly as the explicit support for fundamentally replacing prevailing political and economic institutions. This definition is analytically distinct from adjoining phenomena; it is not synonymous with participating in a permitted protest, identifying with a counter-cultural subculture, casting a ballot for anti-establishment political candidates, or broadly supporting political violence. Revolutionary preference is the specific ideological commitment to systemic institutional overthrow.

The primary deliverables of this explanatory social science report—comprising principal findings, causal mechanisms, and confidence levels—are synthesized in the following table to provide a structural overview of the empirical evidence.

 

The subsequent sections of this report systematically unpack these findings, contrasting traditional materialist models with contemporary sociopsychological frameworks, evaluating the direction of causality through longitudinal data, and applying these structural dynamics to both historical case studies and the contemporary ideological landscape of the United States.

II. Theoretical Foundations: Material Grievance versus Social Identity

The study of revolution and collective action has historically oscillated between theories prioritizing material suffering and those prioritizing organizational capacity. Understanding how social belonging acts as the critical bridge requires a brief examination of these foundational paradigms.

Ted Robert Gurr’s landmark 1970 text, Why Men Rebel, established Relative Deprivation Theory as the dominant explanation for political violence20. Gurr posited that rebellion is not triggered by absolute poverty, but by the psychological frustration born of a discrepancy between what people believe they rightfully deserve (value expectations) and what they actually receive (value capabilities)20. This frustration-aggression linkage suggested that perceived injustice fuels the revolutionary impulse23. However, decades of empirical testing revealed a critical limitation: immense populations experience acute relative deprivation without ever developing revolutionary preferences or engaging in collective action21.

In response, sociologists John McCarthy, Mayer Zald, and Charles Tilly advanced Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT). RMT argued that grievances are relatively constant across societies; therefore, discontent alone cannot explain the sudden emergence of revolutions22. Instead, revolutions occur when dissident networks acquire the tangible and intangible resources—leadership, funding, communication channels, and organizational structures—necessary to challenge the state22. While RMT accurately highlighted the necessity of structural organization, it often minimized the psychological motivations that lead individuals to risk their lives for a cause.

Contemporary social science reconciles this divide through the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA). Developed by Martijn van Zomeren and colleagues through a comprehensive meta-analysis of over 180 studies, SIMCA integrates both grievance and organizational efficacy by identifying social identity as the central mobilizing mechanism26. SIMCA demonstrates that perceived injustice and collective efficacy only result in high-risk action when mediated by a "politicized identity"27. An individual must not merely experience deprivation; they must integrate their personal self-concept into a group identity defined by a struggle for power against an out-group. Through SIMCA, it becomes evident that the social network does not merely provide logistical resources (as RMT suggests); it provides the very psychological architecture—the collective identity—that makes revolutionary action conceivable30.

III. The Pre-Radicalization State: Social Isolation and the Cognitive Opening

To comprehend why individuals adopt ideologies seeking the total replacement of societal institutions, it is necessary to examine the psychological vulnerabilities that precede ideological adoption. In the contemporary United States, declining community attachment has fundamentally altered the social landscape, creating vast reservoirs of latent vulnerability.

Research on radicalization frequently identifies the "cognitive opening" as the initial stage of ideological transformation32. A cognitive opening is a psychological state precipitated by profound personal crises, trauma, perceived discrimination, or acute social isolation29. When an individual's prevailing worldview is shattered by these experiences, they experience deep uncertainty regarding their identity, status, and societal role33. This anomia—the breakdown of social bonds between an individual and their community—renders them highly receptive to alternative, often extreme, ideological frameworks that promise to restore order and meaning33.

The contemporary decline in traditional civic associations, religious congregations, and community groups has exacerbated this isolation. In this vacuum, revolutionary groups exploit the cognitive opening by constructing compelling, unambiguous narratives that strictly delineate an oppressed "in-group" from a hostile "out-group"37. The ideological flavor of the group—whether revolutionary left, right-wing libertarian, militant nationalist, or radical environmentalist—is often secondary to its sociological function33. The primary appeal lies in the group's capacity to offer an immediate sense of belonging, a restoration of self-esteem, existential purpose, and a clear moral mandate29.

This dynamic is evident across diverse ideological spectrums in Western societies. Individuals who may appear superficially integrated—possessing formal education and employment—can simultaneously experience profound internal resentment and alienation33. When they encounter a network that provides a powerful, unambiguous radical identity, the emotional rewards of belonging to a political cause frequently supersede the logical coherence or the extreme risks of the ideology itself33.

IV. Causal Direction: The Primacy of Socialization Over Selection

A fundamental question in political sociology is whether radical communities are formed by individuals who independently develop revolutionary beliefs and then seek each other out (selection), or whether individuals join communities for social reasons and subsequently adopt the group's revolutionary beliefs (socialization).

The empirical consensus, supported by longitudinal data and microstructural network analyses, points heavily to the primacy of socialization. Individuals are frequently pulled into movements through pre-existing interpersonal networks, and the adoption of radical ideology functions as a mechanism to maintain and strengthen those social bonds1.

Longitudinal Evidence of Network Contagion

The Political Socialization Panel (PSP) conducted by M. Kent Jennings and Richard Niemi provides extensive longitudinal evidence regarding how political attitudes are formed and transmitted3. While early theories assumed a strict vertical transmission of political ideology from parent to child, four-wave panel data tracking individuals over decades reveals that peer influence, network contagion, and the social environment of educational institutions profoundly shape political identities3. Adolescents and young adults actively crystalize their political behavior based on the normative pressures of their immediate friendship networks44. The social selection of friends is primarily based on proximity and shared non-political interests; once the network is formed, political socialization occurs as individuals align their attitudes to match the network's consensus, reducing cognitive dissonance and securing social approval46.

High-Risk Activism and the Microstructural Approach

The supremacy of socialization over ideological selection is vividly illustrated in Doug McAdam’s seminal study of the 1964 Freedom Summer project1. The project, which recruited primarily white college students to register Black voters in Mississippi, involved extreme personal risk, including the threat of violence and death.

If selection were the primary driver, the most ideologically committed individuals would be the ones who participated. However, McAdam found that the pool of applicants shared nearly identical ideological beliefs and moral commitments1. The critical variable that distinguished those who actually traveled to Mississippi from those who dropped out was their degree of embeddedness in supportive social networks2. Participants had stronger ties to prior civil rights networks, campus activism groups, and friends who were also going48.

Sociologist Florence Passy expands on this by demonstrating that networks perform three distinct functions in the mobilization process:

1. The Socialization Function: Networks build individual identities and sensitize members to specific political issues, creating an initial disposition to act41.

2. The Structural-Connection Function: Networks provide the logistical framework and practical opportunities to engage in collective action2.

3. The Decision-Shaping Function: When an individual faces the threshold of high-risk participation, the emotional assurance and normative pressure provided by interpersonal ties shape the ultimate decision to cross into action2.

Similarly, Ziad Munson’s research on political activism demonstrates that individuals frequently join movements through a social connection (e.g., a friend's invitation) while holding highly variable, ambiguous, or even contradictory views on the movement's core ideological issue1. It is the immersion in the network's daily activities—the shared experiences of protest, the emotional solidarity, and the collective identity—that socializes the individual into adopting the rigid, revolutionary ideology of the group1.

The Sageman-Hoffman Debate and Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Radicalization

Within the context of contemporary violent extremism and revolutionary terrorism, this dynamic is mirrored in the academic debate between Bruce Hoffman and Marc Sageman53. Hoffman advocates a top-down model, arguing that radicalization is driven by formal organizational hierarchies, specialized recruiters, and highly structured propaganda dissemination53.

Conversely, Sageman’s "Bunch of Guys" theory emphasizes a bottom-up, network-driven socialization process34. Sageman posits that radicalization is fundamentally a collective process rooted in local friendship and kinship networks. Alienated individuals form localized cliques—often based on homophilic association in workplaces, campuses, or neighborhoods—that undergo collective radicalization through mutual reinforcement and the creation of an isolated echo chamber55. In these environments, ideology serves as a post-hoc justification for action, while the primary drivers are the preservation of the tight-knit social bond, the defense of a shared martial identity, and the thrill of clandestine collective efficacy38.

Contemporary analysis of online radicalization suggests a synthesis of these models: while organizations provide the ideological framing (top-down), the actual adoption of revolutionary attitudes and the crossing of the threshold into action are driven by decentralized, peer-to-peer swarm dynamics (bottom-up) where the emotional rewards of belonging dictate behavior54.

V. Micro-Foundations of Extremity: Identity Fusion and Moral Conviction

While standard social identity theory explains routine political behavior, revolutionary preferences—which require dismantling the status quo and accepting extreme personal risk—are governed by deeper psychological mechanisms. The combination of identity fusion and moral conviction provides the explanatory framework for why individuals willingly sacrifice material security for revolutionary goals.

The Identity Synergy Principle

Identity fusion is a psychological construct describing an extreme form of alignment where the boundaries between the personal self and the social group become highly porous5. In traditional social identity theory, as a person's group identity becomes salient, their personal identity (their sense of individual agency and uniqueness) diminishes6.

Identity fusion theory, however, operates on the "identity synergy principle." For strongly fused individuals, personal agency and social identity are chronically activated and operate simultaneously6. The group is not perceived merely as a political vehicle, but as an existential extension of the self. Fellow group members are perceived through kinship heuristics—as "brothers" and "sisters" in a substitute family6. Because the personal self remains active, the individual feels a profound sense of personal responsibility and agency to act on behalf of the group.

Sacred Values and the Devoted Actor

Revolutionary attitudes solidify into immovable commitments when identity fusion intersects with "sacred values." Research published by the National Academy of Sciences and elaborated by anthropologist Scott Atran outlines the "devoted actor" framework8. Sacred values are moral beliefs that are treated as absolute, universally true, and entirely immune to material trade-offs or rational cost-benefit analyses39.

Psychologist Linda Skitka’s research demonstrates that when political attitudes are imbued with moral conviction, they become independent of normative peer pressure, state authority, or legal constraints5. An individual with a strong but non-moral preference for institutional reform might abandon that preference if the economic costs are too high. However, if the preference for institutional overthrow is a moral conviction, it must be pursued regardless of the consequences.

When an individual is fused with a revolutionary group, and that group perceives an existential threat to its sacred values, the willingness to engage in extreme, self-sacrificial behavior is maximized63. The social network binds individuals morally; the profound emotional rewards of fighting alongside a perceived brotherhood for a sacred cause provide a psychological dividend that rationalist political science models—which assume humans are utility-maximizing actors—fail to capture65. This mechanism explains how revolutionary cells maintain cohesion and motivation even when facing overwhelming state repression and inevitable defeat.

VI. Systemic Collapse: Threshold Models and Preference Falsification

A persistent challenge in political sociology is explaining how regimes that appear broadly supported and completely stable can collapse in sudden, rapid revolutionary cascades. If revolutionary attitudes are built on deep socialization and identity fusion, how do they suddenly manifest across millions of people? The answer lies in network topology, threshold models, and the fragility of public opinion.

Granovetter’s Threshold Models of Collective Behavior

Mark Granovetter’s threshold model revolutionized the understanding of protest and sedition by demonstrating that collective action is not a simple aggregate of individual ideologies. Instead, an individual's decision to participate depends directly on the proportion of others already participating10.

Every individual possesses a "threshold"—the number of peers who must adopt a behavior before they feel safe or compelled to join.

• A vanguard revolutionary possesses a threshold of 0; they will act regardless of others.
• A highly sympathetic individual might have a threshold of 1 or 2\.
• A moderate citizen might have a threshold of 50\.

If a society possesses a continuous distribution of thresholds (e.g., 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...), a massive revolutionary cascade will occur. The person with a threshold of 0 acts, triggering the person with a threshold of 1, which triggers the person with a threshold of 2, resulting in a systemic chain reaction9.

However, if the distribution is slightly altered (e.g., 0, 1, 2, 4, 5...), the cascade halts permanently at 2, because the individual with a threshold of 4 lacks the necessary social proof. This creates a "predictability paradox": two societies with nearly identical levels of material grievance and ideological discontent can experience wildly different outcomes—one remaining perfectly stable and the other descending into revolution—based entirely on micro-level variations in network connectivity9.

Preference Falsification and Pluralistic Ignorance

Economist Timur Kuran expanded this framework with the theory of preference falsification. In environments where revolutionary attitudes carry severe social or legal sanctions, individuals systematically misrepresent their true political beliefs to accommodate perceived public pressure12. This dynamic severs public opinion (what people say) from private opinion (what people actually believe)12.

When preference falsification is pervasive, it generates pluralistic ignorance—a state where the vast majority of a population privately despises a political system, but because everyone publicly complies, each individual falsely believes that they are totally isolated in their discontent10. The regime's stability is essentially an illusion maintained by collective deception.

Revolutionary networks succeed not by slowly convincing people to adopt radical ideas, but by safely unlocking this latent consensus. When a small, highly clustered core of "true believers" (those with a threshold of 0\) visibly defect and survive, they shatter the pluralistic ignorance10. This provides the requisite social proof for individuals with lower thresholds to reveal their true preferences, rapidly accelerating a cascade. The system collapses almost overnight because the revolutionary attitudes were already present; they simply required the sociological mechanism of the network to be safely expressed12.

VII. Institutional Stability vs. Subversion: The Dual Nature of Civil Society

A foundational premise of democratic theory, popularized by Alexis de Tocqueville and modern neo-Tocquevilleans, is that a robust civil society—characterized by dense community networks, clubs, and voluntary associations—inherently stabilizes political institutions and inoculates the populace against extremism. However, independent structural analysis reveals that strong community networks can act as the very conduits for revolutionary subversion.

Bonding vs. Bridging Social Capital

To understand this duality, it is necessary to disaggregate social capital. As detailed in studies of social capital, networks generate differing types of sociological value16:

 

Institutional stability relies on bridging social capital. However, when bonding social capital is exceptionally high but bridging capital is non-existent, society fragments into deeply loyal, insular tribes16. In these environments, the intense solidarity of the group demands ideological conformity, creating highly fertile ground for revolutionary attitudes that view the outside world with suspicion and hostility72.

Stabilizing Counterexamples

Circumstances where strong community networks stabilize institutions occur precisely when bridging capital is mandated by the social structure. For example, inclusive workplace environments, cross-denominational religious initiatives, and heterogeneous civic organizations force individuals into sustained contact with out-group members. This cross-cutting discourse structurally inhibits group polarization, dismantles the "us vs. them" narratives required for identity fusion, and anchors individuals to the institutional status quo72.

The Weimar Republic Paradox

The catastrophic potential of pure bonding social capital is illustrated by Sheri Berman’s analysis of the collapse of the Weimar Republic. Germany in the 1920s possessed an incredibly vibrant civil society; citizens were heavily embedded in choral societies, hiking clubs, and professional associations15.

However, because the macro-level political institutions of the Weimar Republic were weak, economically ineffective, and widely viewed as illegitimate, this dense civil society did not stabilize the democracy. Instead, it balkanized society along rigid ideological lines15. When the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) sought mass mobilization, they systematically infiltrated these horizontally organized, non-political clubs80. The deep bonds of friendship, status, and social trust within these associations were hijacked. Members frequently adopted revolutionary fascist attitudes not out of profound initial ideological commitment, but to maintain their social standing and emotional belonging within their deeply bonded, infiltrated networks79. Berman’s analysis demonstrates that civil society is a "politically neutral multiplier"—it amplifies the prevailing institutional context, acting as a highly efficient vector for revolutionary contagion when the state fails80.

VIII. Movement Trajectories: Inclusion, Moderation, and Repression

The trajectory of a revolutionary movement—whether it succeeds, fails, moderates, or radicalizes further—is heavily dictated by its interaction with formal institutional structures and its attempts to broaden its coalition.

The Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis

Political science has extensively examined the "inclusion-moderation hypothesis," which posits that allowing radical or revolutionary groups to participate in formal, pluralist political processes will induce ideological and behavioral moderation17.

Jillian Schwedler's comparative studies of Islamist parties demonstrate that successful movements often face a paradox: to achieve structural power, they must broaden their coalitions, appealing to citizens with higher thresholds for action18. By entering electoral politics or negotiating with state actors, the movement is forced to make programmatic compromises. Over time, the structural requirements of institutional participation slowly dilute the movement's revolutionary purity18. The collective identity shifts from that of a radical vanguard to a conventional political actor, stabilizing the very institutions the group originally sought to destroy19.

The Exclusion-Radicalization Dynamic

Conversely, when states utilize severe exclusion and repression, the inverse occurs17. State repression destroys the moderate, bridging networks that seek compromise, leaving underground, high-risk, deeply bonded radical networks as the only viable avenues for political expression17.

When dissent is forced into the shadows, the social isolation of the group increases. The risks associated with participation rise dramatically, which organically filters out moderate members and leaves only the most fused, devoted actors17. The shared experience of state violence serves as a powerful cohesive agent, accelerating identity fusion and ensuring that the group's revolutionary attitudes become absolute, violent, and uncompromising17.

IX. Comparative Historical Evidence of Network-Driven Revolution

To ground these theoretical mechanisms, an examination of three comparative historical cases demonstrates how collective identity, neighborhood mapping, and cross-cutting ties have served as the scaffolding for revolutionary mobilization.

The Paris Commune (1871): Neighborhood Networks Over Class

Classical Marxist historiography interpreted the 1871 Paris Commune as a proletarian uprising driven strictly by class-based material grievances. However, sociologist Roger Gould’s empirical analysis in Insurgent Identities demonstrated that the primary vector of revolutionary mobilization was not occupational class, but neighborhood networks13.

Between the 1848 revolution and the 1871 Commune, Baron Haussmann's massive urban renovations physically displaced workers from the center of Paris to the periphery13. This geographic restructuring fundamentally altered Parisian social networks. By 1871, residential proximity and neighborhood solidarity structured social relations, replacing the occupational solidarity that defined 184813. When the insurrection began, enlistment in the revolutionary National Guard and the fierce, self-sacrificial defense of the barricades were determined by localized friendship and neighborhood ties. The collective identity of the insurgents was rooted in their shared municipal space, proving that network topology dictates the parameters of revolutionary mobilization far more effectively than abstract class consciousness2.

The Iranian Revolution (1979): The Mosque-Bazaar Alliance

The 1979 Iranian Revolution, which replaced the secular Pahlavi monarchy with an Islamic Republic, exemplifies the power of structural connection across diverse social strata. While anti-imperialist and economic grievances provided the fuel, the revolution's success relied heavily on the integration of the "mosque and the bazaar"14.

The bazaar was not merely an economic marketplace; it was a dense, highly structured network of traditional merchants, shopkeepers, and urban workers14. Crucially, the bazaar possessed deep, cross-cutting ties with the Shi'a clerical establishment (the ulama) through marriage, financial patronage, and shared religious rituals14. While individual bazaaris held diverse ideological views—ranging from secular nationalism to strict Islamism—their social embeddedness compelled unified collective action against the Shah's regime14. The mosques provided sanctuary, communication networks, and moral framing, while the bazaar provided logistical resources and mass mobilization capability85. The collective identity forged in these overlapping networks superseded individual ideological differences, rendering the revolution a triumph of social structural alignment.

Poland's Solidarity Movement (1980): Bridging Cleavages

The rise of the Solidarność (Solidarity) movement in 1980 Poland illustrates how overcoming social isolation through dense workplace networks can dismantle totalitarian control. Following decades of economic mismanagement by the Soviet-backed regime, workers at the Lenin Shipyard in Gdańsk utilized existing factory networks to organize coordinated strikes90.

Solidarity's unique power lay in its ability to bridge previously isolated social groups: industrial workers, secular intellectual dissidents, and the powerful institutional network of the Catholic Church91. The movement fostered a collective identity that transcended mere trade unionism, becoming a vehicle for Polish national and spiritual resistance92. The Catholic Church provided a protected physical and psychological space where preference falsification could be safely abandoned, allowing citizens to realize the vast extent of anti-communist sentiment90. This network-driven mobilization shattered pluralistic ignorance and proved impervious to the regime's martial law, ultimately forcing the collapse of the Polish communist state90.

X. Ideological Diversity and the Contemporary United States Context

Applying these structural dynamics to the contemporary United States reveals significant vulnerabilities conducive to the proliferation of revolutionary attitudes. The mechanisms of identity fusion, network threshold manipulation, and pluralistic ignorance are currently amplified by modern sociological and technological shifts.

First, the well-documented decline in broad, bridging civic institutions has left vast segments of the American populace experiencing severe social isolation and anomia33. This deficit in community attachment creates a persistent "cognitive opening" across the ideological spectrum29. Individuals bereft of traditional status, recognition, and belonging increasingly seek refuge in hyper-partisan, digitally mediated networks that offer unambiguous moral narratives and substitute kinship33. This is not limited to a single ideology; collective identity supports revolutionary cadres on the militant left, the nationalist right, anti-government libertarian circles, and radical environmentalist factions equally33.

Second, the digitization of socialization has fundamentally altered the threshold models of collective behavior. Historically, preference falsification was maintained because dissidents were geographically isolated and incapable of assessing true public opinion10. Today, algorithms bypass geographic limitations, allowing individuals with radical predispositions to seamlessly discover and connect with like-minded peers globally53. This rapid clustering shatters pluralistic ignorance almost instantly, lowering the threshold for revolutionary action because "social proof" of a radical consensus is continuously generated within the algorithmic echo chamber54.

Third, these digital networks function exactly as Sageman's "Bunch of Guys" model dictates, operating on a macro scale38. Extremist ideologies serve as the binding agents for these networks, but the primary utility for the user is the emotional reward of belonging, status elevation within the in-group, and the shared experience of moral outrage29. As these online cohorts transition into offline interactions, identity fusion takes hold. The political opposition is no longer viewed as citizens with differing policy preferences, but as existential threats to the sacred values of the newly forged collective6. Consequently, revolutionary attitudes in the US are increasingly decentralized, emotionally driven, and dictated by the sociological imperatives of the network rather than formal political logic53.

XI. Conclusion

This independent investigation yields a robust explanatory framework regarding the genesis of revolutionary attitudes. While ideological paradigms and material grievances provide the lexicon and the raw fuel for social unrest, they are analytically insufficient to explain the adoption of preferences for total institutional replacement.

The social science literature overwhelmingly confirms that revolutionary attitudes are driven fundamentally by the human need for social belonging, status, and collective identity33. The causal arrow points predominantly from socialization to ideological adoption; individuals become embedded in radical networks that offer identity and community, and subsequently align their political beliefs to maintain those critical social bonds1. When this network embeddedness achieves identity fusion, and the group's political goals are elevated to sacred values, individuals become immunized against rational deterrence, willing to endure extreme sacrifice for the collective5.

Furthermore, macro-level societal stability is highly dependent on network topology. Thick civil society and strong community attachments are not inherently stabilizing; if comprised solely of inward-looking bonding capital, they can facilitate the rapid, catastrophic spread of extremist ideologies—as demonstrated by historical precedents13.

Ultimately, revolutionary movements are socially constructed phenomena. They emerge and succeed not merely by possessing the most compelling ideology or exploiting the deepest material deprivation, but by constructing the most resilient, deeply fused social networks capable of overcoming preference falsification and unlocking the latent thresholds of collective action.

Works cited

1. McAdam et al-final-final \- Krystal Laryea, https://krystallaryea.com/uploads/macadam\_predicting\_2022.pdf

2. (PDF) Social Networks Matter. But How? \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265005454\_Social\_Networks\_Matter\_But\_How

3. Intergenerational transmission of political participation intention \- Lirias, https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/280052

4. Childhood Socialization and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a, https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=\&httpsredir=1\&article=1011\&context=econ\_fac

5. Why True Believers Make the Ultimate Sacrifice: Sacred Values, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8634031/

6. Identity Fusion, Extreme Pro-Group Behavior, and the Path to Defusion, https://labs.la.utexas.edu/swann/files/2016/03/compass.pdf

7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology \- Artis International, https://artisinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024\_Journal-of-personality-and-social-psychology\_Gomez\_vazquez.pdf

8. Scott Atran on what sustains war: will to fight versus military might, https://fordschool.umich.edu/news/2025/scott-atran-what-sustains-war-will-fight-versus-military-might

9. (PDF) Threshold Models of Collective Behavior II: The Predictability, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347175703\_Threshold\_Models\_of\_Collective\_Behavior\_II\_The\_Predictability\_Paradox\_and\_Spontaneous\_Instigation

10. The Emperor's Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self‐Enforcing, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/427321

11. The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology \- PDF Free Download, https://epdf.pub/the-oxford-handbook-of-analytical-sociology.html

12. Preference falsification \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference\_falsification

13. Insurgent Identities \- The University of Chicago Press, https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo3635234.html

14. Collective action with and without Islam mobilizing the Bazaar in Iran, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289715166\_Collective\_action\_with\_and\_without\_Islam\_mobilizing\_the\_Bazaar\_in\_Iran

15. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic \- SciSpace, https://scispace.com/papers/civil-society-and-the-collapse-of-the-weimar-republic-1a5lncsbec

16. Social capital \- Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social\_capital

17. Why Exclusion and Repression of Moderate Islamists Will Be, https://pomeps.org/why-exclusion-and-repression-of-moderate-islamists-will-be-counterproductive

18. Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen, https://books.google.com/books/about/Faith\_in\_Moderation.html?id=DVwHXnOSeNUC

19. Schwedler, J. (2011). Can Islamists Become Moderates Rethinking, https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2837153

20. WHY MEN REBEL TED GURR \- old.lytlesrebc.edu, https://old.lytlesrebc.edu/document/zuD28t3AD099/Why-Men-Rebel-Ted-Gurr

21. Why Men Rebel? The History of the Great Question since ... \- Brill, https://brill.com/display/book/9781848884564/BP000002.pdf

22. Domestic Political Violence \- Digital Commons @ IWU, https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030\&context=polisci\_honproj

23. Why Men Rebel, https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781317248941\_A30904330/preview-9781317248941\_A30904330.pdf

24. SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, http://mrtno.com/soc3/doc/08.pdf

25. Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation\*, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0FB089F66B863A8C04C05751BF1033C7/S0003055400104010a.pdf/div-class-title-conflict-power-and-relative-deprivation-a-href-fn01-ref-type-fn-a-div.pdf

26. The Social Identity Model of Collective Action at Age10: A potential, https://www.southampton.ac.uk/psychology/news/seminars/2018/05/the-social-identity-model-of-collective-action-at-age-10.page

27. (PDF) Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5246838\_Toward\_an\_Integrative\_Social\_Identity\_Model\_of\_Collective\_Action\_A\_Quantitative\_Research\_Synthesis\_of\_Three\_Socio-Psychological\_Perspectives

28. Toward an integrative Social Identity model of Collective Action, https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/toward-an-integrative-social-identity-model-of-collective-action-/

29. Full article: The Putative Effect of Identity on Extremist Radicalization, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2247621

30. A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

31. Social identity model of collective action (SIMCA). \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Social-identity-model-of-collective-action-SIMCA\_fig2\_5246838

32. How did a Western-born come to Muslim radicalize? Salient identity, https://iro.uiowa.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01IOWA\_INST\&filePid=13813351560002771\&download=true

33. IDENTITY CRISES & RADICALIZATION IN WESTERN SOCIETIES, https://sawabcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Sawab-Center\_Road\_to\_extremism\_Identity\_crises\_\_radicalization\_in\_Western\_societies\_E.pdf

34. What Everybody Should Know about Radicalization and the DRIA, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738669

35. The role of ideology in the radicalization process \- LuissThesis, https://tesi.luiss.it/27141/

36. Radicalization Processes and Transitional Phases in Female ... \- PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10603938/

37. Social Identity, Self-Uncertainty, and Violent Extremism (Chapter 12), https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-the-psychology-of-violent-extremism/social-identity-selfuncertainty-and-violent-extremism/9A58B8E7269E3F35A043CBA6B7A79A8F

38. Interview \- Marc Sageman \- E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2014/11/20/interview-marc-sageman/

39. Why True Believers Make the Ultimate Sacrifice: Sacred Values, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.779120/full

40. Social movements and collective behavior: an integration of meta, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10162496/

41. socialization, connection, and the structure/agency, https://mobilization.kglmeridian.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/maiq/6/2/article-p173.pdf

42. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the, https://dokumen.pub/becoming-a-citizen-incorporating-immigrants-and-refugees-in-the-united-states-and-canada-9780520940024-9780520248991.html

43. Education, Socialization, and Political Trust \- DASH (Harvard), https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/7312037d-c84a-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b/download

44. Political Socialization \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284587670\_Political\_Socialization

45. Social network position mediates the effect of education on active, https://mikaelpersson.org/pp12.pdf

46. The 'Friendship Dynamics of Religion,' or the 'Religious ... \- PMC \- NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3461188/

47. Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225840149\_Friendship\_Networks\_and\_Delinquency\_The\_Relative\_Nature\_of\_Peer\_Delinquency

48. HOW INDIVIDUALS BECOME INVOLVED IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, https://users.manchester.edu/facstaff/aafuller/Files/chapter%204.pdf

49. \[PDF\] The Costs and Risks of Social Activism: A Study of Sanctuary, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Costs-and-Risks-of-Social-Activism%3A-A-Study-of-Wiltfang-McAdam/6d3746d9c09c4759114ff538374b230c1b583a68

50. Explaining differential participation in social movements, https://access.archive-ouverte.unige.ch/access/metadata/a5f8486d-9817-47a7-8b8d-9cf3c51a8f0d/download

51. Social Relays: Micro-Mobilization via the Meso-Level, https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/1992/iii92-104.pdf

52. How Organizations Developed Activistscivic Associations and, https://www.scribd.com/document/1035231146/OceanofPDF-com-How-Organizations-Developed-Activistscivic-Associations-and-Leadership-in-the-21st-Century-Hahrie-Han

53. The Future of Terrorism | National Institute of Justice, https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/future-terrorism

54. 'Virtual jihad': What is the role of terrorist organizations in online, https://projects21.org/2018/01/31/virtual-jihad-what-is-the-role-of-terrorist-organizations-in-online-radicalization/

55. Is it Just A Bunch of Guys? \- Evaluating the Sageman Theory of, https://www.orau.gov/dhssummit/presentations/March17/Panel5/Hendrickson\_Mar17.pdf

56. The Radicalization Process of Homegrown Terrorists, https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/5999n7469

57. Fishermen or Swarm Dynamics? Should we Understand Jihadist, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330360103\_Fishermen\_or\_Swarm\_Dynamics\_Should\_we\_Understand\_Jihadist\_Online-Radicalization\_as\_a\_Top-Down\_or\_Bottom-Up\_Process

58. Understanding Identity Fusion | PDF | Cognition \- Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/688581389/Swann-Identity-Fusion

59. Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause \- PNAS, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1420474111

60. The devoted actor's will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human, https://blogs.uned.es/idenfusion/wp-content/uploads/sites/553/2024/10/Gomez-et-al.-2017\_The-devoted-actor-s-will-to-fight.pdf

61. Why Sacred Values Are Dangerous | The MIT Press Reader, https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/why-sacred-values-are-dangerous/

62. The Psychological Foundations of Moral Conviction \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Linda-Skitka/publication/303265164\_The\_psychological\_foundations\_of\_moral\_conviction/links/5813b12908ae90acb23b7b02/The-psychological-foundations-of-moral-conviction.pdf

63. What motivates devoted actors to extreme sacrifice, identity fusion, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/what-motivates-devoted-actors-to-extreme-sacrifice-identity-fusion-or-sacred-values/9C4C879FEC599F3EE665C2BF8689FD79

64. The Role of the Devoted Actor in War, Revolution, and Terrorism, https://radicalisationresearch.org/research/atran-actor-in-war-revolution-terrorism/

65. (PDF) Moral binding: How emotions, convictions, and identity fusion, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326824303\_Moral\_binding\_How\_emotions\_convictions\_and\_identity\_fusion\_shape\_progroup\_behavior

66. Collective Behavior Research Essay | UsefulResearchPapers.com, https://usefulresearchpapers.com/collective-behavior-research-essay/

67. The cultural evolution of pluralistic ignorance \- PMC \- NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12913015/

68. Mathematical Sociology: Models, Structures, and Open Problems, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/18/3363

69. Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/379/1897/20230027/109434/Modelling-social-norms-an-integration-of-the-norm

70. 'Everybody's doing it': on the persistence of bad social norms, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333518405\_'Everybody's\_doing\_it'\_on\_the\_persistence\_of\_bad\_social\_norms

71. The Standing Ovation Problem | Request PDF \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220657540\_The\_Standing\_Ovation\_Problem

72. Bonding and Bridging Social Capital: The Interactive Effects on, https://libanswers.unomaha.edu/loader?fid=1819\&type=1\&key=28dd7506fed75b4e7788eb1d362052f6

73. Bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative, https://findresearcher.sdu.dk:8443/ws/files/141830051/Exploring\_the\_Social\_Capital\_Grid\_last\_text\_version\_PURE.pdf

74. BRIDGING, LINKING, AND BONDING SOCIAL CAPITAL ... \- CGSpace, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstreams/48a52da9-83ca-453e-ad87-f231e80c521a/download

75. The Ties That Bind: Bonding Versus Bridging Social Capital and, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364327/

76. (PDF) Bonding and Bridging Social Capital A Relevant Concept for, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268049210\_Bonding\_and\_Bridging\_Social\_Capital\_A\_Relevant\_Concept\_for\_Political\_Participation

77. Identity fusion does not quell personal self-interest, https://www.southampton.ac.uk/\~crsi/Gaertner,%20Heger,%20&%20Sedikides,%202018.pdf

78. The Workplace as a Context of Cross-Cutting Political Discourse, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227625116\_The\_Workplace\_as\_a\_Context\_of\_Cross-Cutting\_Political\_Discourse

79. Civil Society and Democracy: Weimar Reconsidered | Request PDF, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233471531\_Civil\_Society\_and\_Democracy\_Weimar\_Reconsidered

80. The Conservative Hijack of Indian Civil Society \- Democratic Erosion, https://democratic-erosion.org/2021/05/06/the-conservative-hijack-of-indian-civil-society/

81. Rethinking the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis \- Project MUSE, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/430297/summary

82. Reassessing the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis, https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/studentTheses/reassessing-the-inclusion-moderation-hypothesis/

83. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris ... \- eBay, https://www.ebay.com/itm/398010014532

84. The Political Nature of the Paris Commune of 1871 and, https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6513\&context=etd

85. COLLECTIVE ACTION WITH AND WITHOUT ISLAM Mobilizing the, https://www.benjaminbsmith.net/uploads/9/0/0/6/9006393/bazaar.pdf

86. Iran's Islamic Revolution in Comparative Perspective, http://www.rochelleterman.com/ComparativeExam/sites/default/files/Bibliography%20and%20Summaries/Arjomand%201986.pdf

87. When ties don't bind: smuggling effects, bazaars and regulatory, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085147.2014.909986

88. CHAPTER 2 FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIAL MOVEMENT THEORY, https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/30008/CHAPTER\_II\_THEORY.pdf?sequence=18\&isAllowed=y

89. Routinizing the Iranian Revolution \- Kadivar.com English, https://english.kadivar.com/2013/11/22/routinizing-the-iranian-revolution/

90. Surviving the Underground \- American Federation of Teachers, https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2005/puddington

91. From anti-authoritarian resistance to democratic ... \- Monika Nalepa, https://www.monikanalepa.com/uploads/6/6/3/1/66318923/folsznalepa.pdf

92. The Rise of Solidarity in Poland | European History \- Fiveable, https://fiveable.me/europe-since-1945/unit-17

93. Poland's Solidarity Movement (1980-1989) \- Nonviolent-conflict.org, https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/polands-solidarity-movement-1980-1989/

94. The Durable Nature and Community Structure of Collective Civic, https://faculty.washington.edu/matsueda/courses/590/Readings/Sampson%20et%20al.%20Civic%20Society%20AJS.pdf

95. Identity complexity, uncertainty, and belongingness, https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1880\&context=cgu\_etd

96. Jihadism as a Subcultural Response to Social Strain \- ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233135552\_Jihadism\_as\_a\_Subcultural\_Response\_to\_Social\_Strain\_Extending\_Marc\_Sageman's\_Bunch\_of\_Guys\_Thesis

97. The Dual Nature of Identity Fusion: A Unifying Force or a Source of, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/e6ad0b63-f368-419a-9fe9-596b30d973eb/download

98. Jihad Dramatically Transformed? Sageman on Jihad and the Internet, https://www.hsaj.org/articles/90

99. The Role of Group Identity in Initiating, Sustaining, and Disengaging, https://warpreventioninitiative.org/peace-science-digest/the-role-of-group-identity-in-initiating-sustaining-and-disengaging-from-participation-in-violent-extremism/