When the Unheard Become Loud: Protest, Repression, and Escalation

Full report

On this page

The trajectory between latent public dissatisfaction and structural political outcome is rarely linear. Across contemporary democracies, sustained grievances—whether rooted in economic precarity, state violence, or democratic deficits—frequently manifest through non-institutional channels. When formal representative mechanisms fail to absorb or address public discontent, citizens deploy repertoires of contention ranging from peaceful marches and labor strikes to nonviolent civil disobedience, property destruction, and political violence1. In response, state security apparatuses deploy strategies of physical containment, judicial pre-emption, or statutory bypass5. Understanding the conditions under which collective mobilization yields organized peaceful reform, prolonged institutional stalemate, or violent escalation requires a systematic examination of protester strategies, state policing doctrines, and legal frameworks across comparative contexts1.

Grievance Dynamics, Structural Triggers, and Repertoires of Contention

Social movements do not emerge in a vacuum; they develop through the dynamic interplay of structural vulnerabilities and immediate catalytic events11. Structural grievances—such as long-term wage stagnation, wealth inequality, racialized policing, and executive overreach—create systemic instability11. However, mass mobilization typically requires a specific policy trigger that symbolizes broader institutional neglect or unfairness12.

In France, the 2018 Yellow Vests (Gilets Jaunes) movement demonstrated how an environmental policy—a scheduled hike in the fuel carbon tax—acted as a tipping point for rural and peri-urban populations reliant on personal automobiles13. The tax was perceived not as a sincere ecological measure, but as a regressive levy imposed on working-class citizens to offset tax cuts for higher earners13. This dynamic re-emerged during the 2023 pension reform protests, where the underlying structural issue was executive governance and the perceived erosion of the social safety net3. When the government utilized Article 49.3 of the French Constitution to bypass a final vote in the National Assembly, the grievance transitioned from a specific debate over raising the statutory retirement age from 62 to 64 into a broader crisis of democratic legitimacy3. In the United States, contestation frequently centers on race, state violence, and the expansion of police infrastructure11. The "Stop Cop City" movement in Atlanta, Georgia, initiated in response to the planned construction of an 85-acre, \$90 million police training facility in the Weelaunee Forest, combined environmental justice grievances with anti-carceral abolitionist philosophies4. Mobilization strategies diverged between public educational campaigns, legal actions, and direct-action tactics such as tree-sits, equipment destruction, and spatial occupations4. In Chile, the 2019 Estallido Social illustrated how a minor policy change—a 30-peso increase in Santiago metro fares—catalyzed broader resistance against decades of structural socioeconomic inequality, privatized healthcare, and underfunded pension systems12. High school students initially organized coordinated fare-evasion campaigns, which rapidly expanded into multi-million-person demonstrations demanding systemic constitutional reform12. Across these contexts, the choice of protest repertoire heavily influences both political impact and the nature of state intervention1. Organized labor strikes, such as those coordinated by French trade union confederations, leverage structural economic power to create non-violent disruption3. Conversely, decentralized direct-action movements rely on spatial disruption, civil disobedience, and occasionally property destruction to impose immediate political costs4.

Determinants of Movement Outcomes: Peaceful Reform, Stalemate, or Escalation

The trajectory of a social movement toward successful policy negotiation, prolonged stalemate, or violent escalation depends on the strategic interaction between protester tactics, public opinion dynamics, and government responsiveness2.

Quantitative Efficacy of Nonviolent vs. Violent Campaigns

Empirical evidence from global conflict datasets demonstrates a consistent historical advantage for nonviolent civil resistance over armed or violent rebellion in achieving maximalist political objectives2. Quantitative analysis of the Nonviolent and Violent Campaigns and Outcomes (NAVCO) dataset, covering major resistance campaigns globally, confirms that nonviolent movements achieve success at more than double the rate of violent campaigns2.

Data derived from 622 campaigns between 1900 and 2019 indicates that nonviolent resistance movements achieved a 46.9% overall success rate, compared to a 23.2% success rate for violent campaigns ([Figure omitted from source export])2. When focusing specifically on maximalist objectives such as regime change or the removal of incumbent national leaders, the success rate of nonviolent campaigns reached 51.7%, whereas violent campaigns succeeded in only 26.1% of cases ([Figure omitted from source export])2. This strategic advantage is primarily driven by participation scale and loyalty shifts23. Nonviolent campaigns lower the physical, moral, and informational barriers to civic participation, enabling diverse demographic coalitions—including elderly citizens, youth, and civil servants—to mobilize23. This broad-based participation increases the likelihood of security force defections and economic disruption23. Quantitative research underscores the "3.5% rule": no national regime has withstood an active, sustained participation threshold of 3.5% of the population during a peak mobilization event, a threshold historically achieved almost exclusively by nonviolent campaigns25.

The Activist's Dilemma, Tactical Extremity, and Public Opinion Dynamics

While nonviolent discipline enhances broad-based mobilization, social movements frequently confront tactical dilemmas when attempting to force policy concessions from non-responsive governments22. When peaceful demonstrations produce institutional stalemate, activist factions often escalate to "extreme protest tactics," such as blocking critical transportation corridors, vandalizing public infrastructure, or conducting property sabotage22. Experimental and observational research on social movement tactics identifies an inherent psychological trade-off termed the "activist's dilemma"22. While disruptive and extreme tactics successfully capture media attention and apply immediate economic or operational pressure, they frequently trigger public backlash22.

Across multiple experimental studies, exposure to extreme protest actions systematically reduced public support for the acting activist group and, to a lesser extent, lowered public backing for the underlying policy cause22. Mediation analyses reveal that observers interpret tactics like highway closures or property vandalism as harmful and counter-normative22. This perception diminishes emotional connection and social identification with the movement, alienating bystander publics whose support is critical for political leverage22. However, the presence of radical factions can produce complex "radical flank effects"27. While an extreme radical flank incurs public disapproval, it can alter the perceived position of moderate groups within the same movement27. By framing the radical flank as unreasonable or dangerous, institutional elites may feel compelled to negotiate with moderate leaders to avert further disruption, provided the broader movement retains institutional channels for compromise27.

State Repression, Policing Doctrines, and Escalation Mechanics

State responses to mass protest dictate whether public disorder de-escalates into peaceful resolution or spirals into sustained violent confrontation6. Governments utilize a spectrum of tactics ranging from physical public order policing to judicial pre-emption and legislative maneuvering5.

France: Maintien de l'Ordre, Hyper-Executive Bypassing, and Tactical Escalation

The French model of crowd management, historically anchored in the doctrine of maintien de l'ordre, has undergone a structural shift from passive containment toward mobile, confrontational intervention6. Historically managed by specialized units such as the Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (CRS) and the Gendarmerie Mobile, public order policing increasingly incorporates specialized motorized units like the Brigades de répression de l'action violente motorisée (BRAV-M)7. During the Gilets Jaunes mobilizations and environmental protests (such as the 2023 Sainte-Soline reservoir demonstrations), the deployment of intermediate force weapons—specifically the Lanceur de balle de défense (LBD 40\) rubber bullet launcher and GM2L sting grenades—resulted in elevated protester casualty rates6. Human rights monitors documented over 2,400 protester injuries during the Gilets Jaunes actions, including 344 head injuries, 29 instances of permanent loss of sight, and 5 hand amputations caused by explosive munitions6. Data from ACLED highlights that this confrontational posture extended into urban unrest following the fatal police shooting of a youth in Nahel Merzouk in mid-202336. ACLED recorded over 450 demonstration events across nearly 300 cities and towns, marking the most intense surge in street violence recorded in France since ACLED coverage began in 202036. The unrest involved over 150 targeted attacks on municipal buildings, mayor's offices, and police stations, resulting in approximately 700 injured police personnel and over 3,000 protester detentions36. This kinetic escalation was complemented by judicial pre-emption7. French authorities expanded the use of vague legal offenses, such as "participating in a group formed with a view to preparing violence or damage" (groupement en vue de commettre des violences)7. This legal mechanism allows law enforcement to preemptively detain individuals traveling to demonstrations, effectively converting intent into a criminal offense and restricting assemblies prior to any disruptive act7. At the governance level, hyper-executive maneuvers have deepened public opposition5. The reliance on constitutional mechanisms like Article 49.3 to pass controversial pension legislation without a final parliamentary vote bypasses political negotiation5. By closing parliamentary channels for institutional compromise, executive reliance on Article 49.3 transforms peaceful, policy-focused union strikes into confrontational street mobilization3.

United States: Police Militarization, Judicial Overreach, and Institutional Contestation

In the United States, protest response is characterized by material militarization and judicialization8. Through the federal 1033 Program, authorized under the National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. Department of Defense has transferred surplus military equipment—including armored Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles, high-caliber rifles, tactical gear, and grenade launchers—to state and local Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs)8. Empirical research linking 1033 equipment transfers to police behavior demonstrates a positive and statistically significant relationship between police militarization and violent outcomes19. Quantitative models confirm that law enforcement agencies receiving higher levels of military transfers exhibit significantly higher rates of officer-involved civilian shootings and fatalities19. Holding all covariates at their means, moving from the minimum to the maximum value of military equipment receipts increases expected annual civilian fatalities from officer-involved shootings by approximately 129% ([Figure omitted from source export])19. The material acquisition of military gear fosters a psychological "warrior mindset," shifting the operational threshold for acceptable force toward lethal measures during public assemblies19. Simultaneously, state prosecutors have increasingly utilized judicial levers to suppress organized civil disobedience9. The legal response to the "Stop Cop City" movement in Georgia illustrates this approach9. In 2023, the Georgia Attorney General's Office indicted 61 individuals under the state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute, alongside domestic terrorism charges under a 2017 state statute9. The state's broad indictment framed mutual aid funds, legal support operations, and decentralized forest defense as an overarching criminal conspiracy9. This judicialization created a chilling effect on First Amendment activities20. However, this strategy faced significant constitutional and evidentiary hurdles in court38. In September 2025, a Fulton County Superior Court judge dismissed the core RICO conspiracy counts covering 100 pages of the state's 109-page indictment, alongside dropping domestic terrorism charges against key defendants, highlighting the legal fragility of overextended conspiracy charges against political movements38.

Chile and the Repression Backfire Mechanism

The systematic application of state repression does not automatically suppress mobilization; under predictable conditions, it triggers a "backfire effect"10. Repression backfire occurs when state violence against peaceful or non-lethal protesters violates widely held societal norms, generating moral outrage among bystander publics, elite allies, and security personnel10. This outrage shifts public perception, reframing the state as an illegitimate aggressor and transforming passive sympathetic observers into active movement participants43. During the 2019 Chilean Estallido Social, violent repression by the Carabineros—which resulted in hundreds of severe ocular injuries caused by rubber and lead kinetic rounds—failed to clear the streets12. Instead, it mobilized over 1.2 million citizens in Santiago, forcing political elites to initiate a constitutional reform process to rewrite the country's Pinochet-era constitution12.

De-escalation Pathways, Harm Reduction, and Responsive Governance

Preventing violent escalation and preserving democratic rights requires structural adjustments to both public order policing and government negotiation practices15.

Dialogue Policing and the Elaborated Social Identity Model (ESIM)

Conventional public order policing frequently treats crowds as homogenous, volatile masses prone to collective madness—a theoretical perspective derived from outdated crowd psychology41. Modern public order management relies on the Elaborated Social Identity Model (ESIM), which recognizes that crowds consist of diverse subgroups with varying levels of commitment to disruptive action41. When police apply indiscriminate force, such as tear gas or baton charges, against an entire crowd in response to minor disruptive acts by a small radical subgroup, they alter the collective identity of the crowd41. Peaceful participants come to view the police as an indiscriminate threat, uniting the crowd behind the radical subgroup and escalating violent conflict41. To break this escalation cycle, police forces in Sweden, Denmark, and select international jurisdictions developed "Dialogue Policing" doctrines40. Dialogue policing operationalizes four core principles derived from ESIM:

• Education: Police must understand the specific culture, goals, grievances, and intra-group dynamics of protesting groups41.
• Facilitation: Law enforcement actively assists protesters in exercising their constitutional right to assemble and communicate their message41.
• Communication: Dedicated, unarmed dialogue officers maintain continuous, transparent communication with movement organizers before and during demonstrations to manage expectations and de-escalate tension40.
• Differentiated Intervention: Police target interventions strictly at specific individuals committing violent offenses, isolating them without disrupting or using force against the surrounding peaceful crowd41.

Empirical evaluations show that dialogue policing encourages self-regulation within crowds41. Protesters themselves isolate and discourage violent behavior within their ranks when they perceive police actions as procedurally fair, legitimate, and proportionate41.

Deliberative Democracy and Institutional Follow-Through

Beyond public order tactics, preventing prolonged stalemate and violent escalation requires genuine mechanisms for institutional responsiveness15. Governments frequently attempt to manage mass grievances through formalistic deliberative exercises15. Following the Yellow Vests crisis, French President Emmanuel Macron launched the Grand Débat National alongside the Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat—a deliberative body of 150 randomly selected citizens recruited by Harris Interactive with a €5.4 million budget, tasked with formulating proposals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40%15. While the convention produced 149 detailed policy proposals, its long-term impact was undermined by a lack of institutional follow-through44. When the executive branch modified or discarded key recommendations despite initial commitments to submit them "without filter" to parliament or referendum, public trust eroded44. Deliberative initiatives that lack binding legislative mechanisms risk being perceived as co-optation tactics, exacerbating institutional distrust and reigniting street protests15.

Strategic Conclusions and Policy Implications

The dynamic between public protest and state power reveals that democratic resilience depends on the structural capacity of state institutions to process conflict without resorting to military force or judicial overreach2. State responses that prioritize kinetic containment, broad conspiracy indictments, and executive maneuvers often achieve temporary tactical control at the expense of long-term democratic legitimacy5. To reduce harm, prevent violent escalation, and preserve democratic stability, state institutions and social movement actors should consider several structural reforms:

• De-militarize Domestic Law Enforcement: Governments should curtail or eliminate programs that transfer surplus military weaponry, armored vehicles, and tactical gear to civilian police departments8. Empirical evidence confirms that militarization increases civilian casualties without enhancing public safety8.
• Institutionalize Dialogue Policing: Law enforcement agencies should replace confrontational crowd management doctrines with frameworks built on the Elaborated Social Identity Model (ESIM)41. Public order strategies must prioritize continuous communication, facilitation of peaceful assembly, and targeted interventions over indiscriminate force41.
• Prevent Legal Overreach Against Civil Society: Prosecutors and state legislatures must avoid using racketeering, domestic terrorism, and overbroad conspiracy statutes against nonviolent activists, legal observers, and bail funds9. Overbroad judicialization damages state credibility when charges fail under constitutional scrutiny38.
• Maintain Institutional Pathways for Negotiated Compromise: Executive bodies must resist bypassing legislative procedures during periods of intense public opposition5. When governments establish deliberative assemblies or participatory forums, they must establish binding legislative pathways to ensure citizen input leads to actionable policy outcomes44.
• Sustain Nonviolent Strategic Discipline: Social movements aiming for durable structural change achieve significantly higher success rates by maintaining nonviolent discipline2. While disruptive tactics can highlight urgent issues, movements must weigh tactical disruption against the risk of public backlash and alienation22.

When democratic states treat mass protest as a threat to be neutralized through physical and judicial coercion rather than a signal of unaddressed grievance, they risk transforming policy disputes into constitutional crises10. Sustainable stability requires maintaining responsive channels for dissent, ensuring procedural fairness in policing, and honoring the fundamental right to public assembly35.

Works cited

1. United States: Scope and coverage in ACLED data, https\://acleddata.com/methodology/united-states-scope-and-coverage-acled-data

2. (PDF) Empirical Analysis of Resistance Outcomes: Violent vs. Non, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/415258644\_Empirical\_Analysis\_of\_Resistance\_Outcomes\_Violent\_vs\_Non-Violent\_Campaigns

3. 2023 French pension reform strikes \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023\_French\_pension\_reform\_strikes

4. Stop Cop City \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop\_Cop\_City

5. French Pension Reform Brings Moderate Fiscal Benefit, Shows, https\://www\.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/french-pension-reform-brings-moderate-fiscal-benefit-shows-challenges-22-03-2023

6. Police violence and the state: The negotiation of the boundaries, https\://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9091386/file/9091395.pdf

7. France: Dropping Out of Democracy, https\://www\.omct.org/site-resources/legacy/20250922\_Rapport-OBS-FRANCE\_EN-WEB\_2025-09-24-205445\_ibfq.pdf

8. Federal Militarization of Law Enforcement Must End | ACLU, https\://www\.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/federal-militarization-of-law-enforcement-must-end

9. 61 indicted in Georgia on racketeering charges connected to 'Stop, https\://apnews.com/article/atlanta-cop-city-protests-rico-charges-3177a63ac1bd31a1594bed6584e9f330

10. Justifications of repression in autocracies: an empirical analysis of, https\://www\.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569775.2023.2265287

11. Chapter 1: Police Militarization: Implications for Communities of Color, https\://www\.emerald.com/books/edited-volume/13508/chapter/84135380/Police-Militarization-Implications-for-Communities

12. Chile's constitutional awakening | OpenGlobalRights, https\://www\.openglobalrights.org/chiles-constitutional-awakening/

13. Yellow Vests: Anti-austerity, pro-democracy, and popular (not populist), https\://www\.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.1037942/full

14. (PDF) The 2023 France Pension Reform \- ResearchGate, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/371623068\_The\_2023\_France\_Pension\_Reform

15. Macron, the Yellow Vests and the National Debate, https\://www\.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2019C17/

16. 'Democracy is broken': French public divided on pensions and protests, https\://www\.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/25/democracy-is-broken-france-view-of-pension-reform-and-protests

17. The French Protest Pension Reform, [https\://cdn.website-editor.net/s/9cbc1728769a439897acc7f1557971d9/files/uploaded/M2023FrenchProtestPensionReform.pdf?Expires=1793405376\&Signature=TZoBle16ww11kE\~LKdC21WdqD8X0ZWt-M\~oNKi7s7xDoysLEYKGFcmPjTheEAeZAyqvVWbfcNSdPXfNwDHuFF23SxD8Wxnc9C1HueFxmNJMzVgT-GhOJ9bSVRHE-3XzArhe13vdsxrXx6DyLoCreZnTAHNMHf7ZGlOVnkL8q-V5GUn49aVHIDfzR5o1pdFaNf-sudK8wuK8wqHkdbT3c7uyfTkyyytGpoSY98BRXeFC9PWAyN2ek1dsq2DcRsHQH0AGRx0A9jvaQBn7s1RDTD0VTY23bovOk0To9CIMTobK5RwDru1C\~0pGPBEZwcp4mcMfNKgxto4ASEjDzWkGqGg\_\_\&Key-Pair-Id=K2NXBXLF010TJW](https://cdn.website-editor.net/s/9cbc1728769a439897acc7f1557971d9/files/uploaded/M2023FrenchProtestPensionReform.pdf?Expires=1793405376&Signature=TZoBle16ww11kE~LKdC21WdqD8X0ZWt-M~oNKi7s7xDoysLEYKGFcmPjTheEAeZAyqvVWbfcNSdPXfNwDHuFF23SxD8Wxnc9C1HueFxmNJMzVgT-GhOJ9bSVRHE-3XzArhe13vdsxrXx6DyLoCreZnTAHNMHf7ZGlOVnkL8q-V5GUn49aVHIDfzR5o1pdFaNf-sudK8wuK8wqHkdbT3c7uyfTkyyytGpoSY98BRXeFC9PWAyN2ek1dsq2DcRsHQH0AGRx0A9jvaQBn7s1RDTD0VTY23bovOk0To9CIMTobK5RwDru1C~0pGPBEZwcp4mcMfNKgxto4ASEjDzWkGqGg__&Key-Pair-Id=K2NXBXLF010TJW)

18. Massive nationwide strike hits France over pension reform \- Al Jazeera, https\://www\.aljazeera.com/news/2023/3/7/1-28m-people-protest-macrons-pension-reform-plan-ministry

19. Militarization and police violence: The case of the 1033 program, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/317581659\_Militarization\_and\_police\_violence\_The\_case\_of\_the\_1033\_program

20. Cop City and Terrorism\_Final \- Costs of War, https\://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/sites/default/files/papers/Cop-City-and-Terrorism.pdf

21. Chile's Estallido Social and the Art of Protest \- Sociologica, https\://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/16817

22. (PDF) The Activist's Dilemma: Extreme Protest Actions Reduce, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/338562538\_The\_activist's\_dilemma\_Extreme\_protest\_actions\_reduce\_popular\_support\_for\_social\_movements

23. Why Civil Resistance Works \- Nonviolent-conflict.org, https\://www\.nonviolent-conflict.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Why-Civil-Resistance-Works..The-Strategic-Logic-of-Nonviolent-Conflict.pdf

24. Are peaceful protests more successful than violent ones?, https\://www\.datawrapper.de/blog/are-peaceful-protests-more-successful-than-violent-ones

25. Civil Resistance and the 3.5% Rule: An Overview \- Commons Library, https\://commonslibrary.org/chenoweth-3-5percent-rule/

26. The Harvard Professor Who Quantified Democracy, https\://www\.harvardmagazine.com/2025/07/erica-chenoweth-democracy-data-harvard

27. Extreme Protest Tactics Reduce Support for the Climate Movement, https\://osf.io/download/n6aw2

28. Interview with Inside Climate News \- Jarren Nylund \- Medium, https\://jarrennylund.medium.com/interview-with-inside-climate-news-9cefd7537199

29. How disruptiveness and logic influence media coverage and, https\://commonslibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/Making-a-scene-and-making-sense-How-disruptiveness-and-logic-influence-media-coverage-and-support-for-protests-Social-Change.pdf

30. Extreme Protest Tactics Reduce Popular Support for Social, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/314949726\_Extreme\_Protest\_Tactics\_Reduce\_Popular\_Support\_for\_Social\_Movements

31. Better for Animals: The Evidence Behind Protests, https\://animalcharityevaluators.org/blog/better-for-animals-the-evidence-behind-protests/

32. The effect of disruptive protests on public opinion \- PMC \- NIH, https\://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13064859/

33. Tactics from Social Movements: Analysis for animal advocacy, https\://www\.animalask.org/post/choosing-tactics-evidence-from-social-movement-theory

34. Analyzing the (De)Escalation of Protest Violence \- CityUHK Scholars, https\://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/repression-emotion-contagion-analyzing-the-deescalation-of-protes/

35. MAINTAINING LAW AND ORDER: AT WHAT COST? \- Statewatch, https\://statewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/fr-acat-policing-public-order-3-20.pdf

36. Fact Sheet: Unrest Spikes in France After Fatal Police Shooting, https\://acleddata.com/brief/fact-sheet-unrest-spikes-france-after-fatal-police-shooting

37. Causes and Consequences of Police Militarization, https\://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6139\&context=etd

38. Prosecutors' 'Cop City' case collapses as judge tosses Rico, https\://www\.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/cop-city-case-georgia-prosecutors

39. NLG Condemns Georgia Indictments of Stop Cop City Protesters, https\://www\.nlg.org/national-lawyers-guild-condemns-georgia-indictments-of-stop-cop-city-protesters/

40. Crime Prevention Studies, Volume 26, https\://www\.popcenter.org/content/crime-prevention-studies-volume-26-volume-26

41. The Columbus model: crowd psychology, dialogue policing and, https\://www\.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10439463.2025.2532546

42. Dialogue Police, Decision Making, and the Management of Public, https\://www\.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/dialogue-police-decision-making-and-the-management-of-public-orde/

43. The Paradox Of Repression And Nonviolent Movements, https\://works.swarthmore.edu/context/fac-soc-anth/article/1178/viewcontent/fac\_soc\_anth\_179.pdf

44. The Citizens' Convention on Climate \- Participedia, https\://participedia.net/case/the-citizens-convention-on-climate

45. Unique Citizens' Convention initiates referendum on climate change, https\://www\.democracy-international.org/unique-citizens-convention-initiates-referendum-climate-change-france

46. The Rise of Police Militarization and Impact on Civilians, https\://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088\&context=themis