The Civil-War Trap: Fragmented Sovereignty, Security Splits, and Urban Collapse

Full report

On this page

1. The Mutation of Modern Internal Conflict

The architecture of contemporary civil war has fundamentally mutated, shifting away from classic dyadic struggles between a unified state apparatus and a singular insurgent movement. Modern internal conflicts have devolved into highly complex, fragmented ecosystems of competing governance, decentralized violence, and catastrophic urban collapse. When political grievances transcend the threshold of civilian protest and civil resistance, the state’s monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force—the foundational definition of sovereignty—fractures1. This rupture initiates a profound institutional crisis characterized by overlapping, competing coercive authorities vying not merely for territorial control, but for the institutional capacity to govern, tax, and regulate civilian populations3. The phenomenon described herein as the "Civil-War Trap" represents a paradigm wherein the initial collapse of state authority generates a self-sustaining cycle of federal fragmentation, security sector mutiny, economic weaponization, and the total failure of urban infrastructure. As conflict increasingly centralizes in densely populated urban centers, the kinetic effects of explosive weapons trigger cascading, reverberating failures across interconnected urban metabolisms. Modern cities rely on an intricate, interdependent web of electricity, water, sanitation, communications, transport, food, and healthcare systems5. Consequently, the failure of a single node cascades across the entire network, ensnaring millions of civilians in a protracted crisis of survival, forced displacement, and structural degradation5.

2. Fragmented Sovereignty and the Architecture of Rebel Governance

The assumption that civil wars merely destroy political orders, leaving behind an ungoverned void, fundamentally mischaracterizes the nature of modern conflict. In reality, civil wars are highly competitive processes of state formation and institutional reconfiguration7. As historical analyses observe, the processes of war-making and state-making are inextricably linked; however, in the modern intra-state context, war often fragments power and sovereignty into localized, competing fiefdoms2. When the issue ceases to be merely a protest against the state and evolves into a systemic challenge for territorial control, the conflict environment transforms into a landscape of dual or multiple sovereignties.

2.1 The Spectrum of Insurgent Rule: From Aliocracy to Rebelocracy

When insurgent groups consolidate territorial control, they are immediately confronted with the strategic necessity of managing the civilian population. Rebel governance involves the organization of civilians for public purposes under armed threat, operating without the benefit of international sovereignty4. The degree to which rebels intervene in civilian life varies drastically depending on their ideological ambitions, their reliance on local resources, and the quality of pre-existing state institutions9. Empirical scholarship identifies a spectrum of rebel governance systems, shaped by the insurgents' need to establish both moral and pragmatic legitimacy among the populace11. In environments characterized by high resource extraction, rebels may bypass civilian governance entirely, relying on brute coercion. However, a more common minimalist governance model is defined as an "aliocracy." Under an aliocracy, the armed actor establishes a monopoly on public order and extracts taxes but deliberately avoids intervening in the broader social, political, or economic lives of the population10. Conversely, a maximalist governance model, termed a "rebelocracy," occurs when the insurgent organization functions as a parallel administration or shadow government. Within a rebelocracy, insurgents actively regulate social conduct, adjudicate disputes through parallel legal systems, dictate educational curricula, and provide public goods such as healthcare and infrastructure maintenance10. The transition toward a rebelocracy is driven by a strategic calculus: maximizing civilian compliance while minimizing the costs of coercion. Indiscriminate violence is an inefficient mechanism for maintaining long-term control; by adjudicating disputes and providing predictable rules, rebels reduce friction and generate a baseline of societal order that facilitates their primary military objectives12.

2.2 Taxation and Information Warfare as Technologies of Governance

A critical dimension of dual sovereignty is the implementation of wartime taxation and the control of information. Rebel taxation is frequently misunderstood as mere extortion; however, it functions as a sophisticated technology of governance that binds the civilian population to the insurgent authority through an implicit fiscal contract4. The routinization of tax collection requires the establishment of insurgent bureaucracies, which inadvertently builds the administrative capacity of the rebel state14. Simultaneously, competing authorities engage in fierce information warfare to legitimize their taxation and governance structures while delegitimizing their adversaries. As the state fragments, control over local telecommunications infrastructure becomes as vital as controlling physical territory. Insurgent groups utilize captured broadcast networks and internet service nodes to disseminate propaganda, project an aura of inevitable victory, and enforce compliance5. Information warfare is utilized to shape civilian behavior, mask atrocities, and manipulate international perception, thereby securing moral legitimacy and framing the insurgency as the true protector of the populace11. The administrative and informational structures forged during the conflict actively subvert the restoration of unified sovereignty long after the cessation of hostilities. When civilians become accustomed to the predictable taxation structures and legal narratives of a rebel authority, it actively erodes the post-war legitimacy of the returning central state. Exposure to rebel governance often results in a diminished sense of civic duty toward the central government and a higher tolerance for anti-state behavior, including post-war tax evasion14.

3. Security Sector Splintering and the Dynamics of Defection

The disintegration of the state’s central authority is inextricably linked to the internal fracturing of its security apparatus. The interactions between the military, the police, the incumbent regime, and the civilian population during moments of acute internal unrest constitute the critical tipping points that dictate whether a state survives a popular uprising or descends into civil war15. Security force defections dramatically alter the balance of power, fundamentally stripping the regime of its primary pillar of support and providing insurgent movements with the tactical proficiency required to challenge the state15.

3.1 The Catalysts of Military and Police Defection

The structural composition of a state's security sector heavily influences its propensity to fracture. Regimes frequently utilize "coup-proofing" strategies, constructing elite security units and police forces around specific ethnic, religious, or tribal loyalties to ensure regime survival15. While this insulates the executive leadership in the short term, it guarantees that marginalized groups within the broader military will defect when ordered to suppress their own ethno-religious constituencies15. The psychological threshold of state violence serves as the primary catalyst for mass defection. Military personnel, particularly conscripts, are highly susceptible to defection when ordered to inflict extreme, indiscriminate violence against unarmed civilian protesters. Crossing this "red line" of civilian suppression frequently triggers mutinies and localized rebellion15. Furthermore, security forces act as rational, self-preserving actors. When portions of the military perceive that the regime is losing the capacity to maintain power, a bandwagoning effect occurs. Factions will pre-emptively defect to the opposition to secure a favorable position in the anticipated post-conflict political order18.

3.2 Army-Splinters and the Lethality of Mutiny

The nature of the security sector’s fragmentation dictates the trajectory and intensity of the ensuing civil war. Conflict scholars distinguish between "coup-related civil wars" and "army-splinter rebellions"19. In coup attempts, a faction of the military seeks a sudden, total overthrow of the regime. If the coup fails but the plotters retain control of military assets, the conflict instantly devolves into a conventional civil war between two heavily armed, highly trained factions representing competing visions of the state apparatus19. Conversely, army-splinter rebellions occur when military or police units defect not to seize the capital, but to secede or align with peripheral insurgent movements. These state-splinter groups bring pre-existing leadership hierarchies, military resources, tactical training, and insider knowledge of the government's operational vulnerabilities to the rebel cause19. The introduction of professional military defectors into an insurgent ecosystem rapidly accelerates the conflict's lethality, transforming disorganized protest movements into capable paramilitary organizations capable of capturing and holding urban centers.

4. Veto Players, Foreign Patronage, and Conflict Intractability

As sovereignty fragments and security forces split, the conflict environment becomes saturated with autonomous armed actors. This proliferation creates a severe structural barrier to peace known as the "Veto Player" dilemma20.

4.1 The Veto Player Framework

Within the context of civil war, a veto player is defined as an actor or faction whose agreement is required to terminate the conflict, and who possesses the military and political capacity to unilaterally continue the war if they reject a peace settlement20. The statistical correlation between the number of veto players and the duration of a civil war is overwhelmingly positive; conflicts with multiple veto players last substantially longer and are significantly more immune to mediation than dyadic conflicts20. The intractability of fragmented conflicts arises from severe bargaining frictions. As the number of armed factions increases, the range of mutually acceptable peace agreements shrinks exponentially. Information asymmetries regarding the relative strength of each group multiply, making it impossible for mediators to accurately gauge the balance of power. Even if a central government signs a comprehensive peace agreement with a primary rebel coalition, outlier veto players can act as "spoilers," resuming hostilities, launching asymmetric attacks, and dragging the reconciled parties back into the conflict21.

4.2 Proxy Warfare and External Intervention

The veto player dynamic is catastrophically exacerbated by foreign intervention. When external states provide financial, military, and logistical patronage to specific factions, they effectively transform local armed groups into proxy forces21. External state sponsors function as remote veto players. Because these foreign actors do not bear the direct human, economic, and infrastructural costs of the fighting occurring on the ground, they possess fundamentally different risk tolerances and incentive structures than the local combatants21. Consequently, external patrons will frequently sabotage peace negotiations to advance broader regional geopolitical interests, subsidizing their proxy forces to continue fighting long after local resources have been exhausted. This external subsidization artificially inflates the military capacity of minority factions, ensuring that the war persists far beyond the natural exhaustion point of the domestic combatants20.

5. Macroeconomic Collapse and the Weaponization of Sovereignty

The institutional fragmentation of the state inevitably cascades into the macroeconomic sphere. Civil wars are often preceded and prolonged by the structural vulnerabilities of "rentier states"—nations that derive a substantial portion of their income from external rents, such as the export of natural resources or foreign strategic aid, rather than domestic taxation22.

5.1 The Vulnerability of the Rentier State

Rentier political economies foster a severe detachment between the government and its citizens. Because the state does not rely on the population for revenue, there is no organic fiscal contract; the state functions merely as an allocation mechanism, distributing patronage to loyalists rather than providing representative governance22. This structural dynamic breeds vast socioeconomic inequality and a lack of merit-based employment24. When global commodity prices collapse, or when external aid is withdrawn, the rentier state loses its capacity to subsidize its patronage networks and security apparatus. Grievances rapidly convert into rebellion, as the opportunity cost for civilians to join insurgencies plummets24. Furthermore, the presence of easily extractable natural resources provides insurgents with the precise financial mechanisms needed to fund their rebellion, incentivizing armed groups to capture resource-rich enclaves and permanently fracture the national economy.

5.2 Monetary Fragmentation: The Yemen Case Study

The ultimate manifestation of economic collapse in civil war is the weaponization of the national currency and the bifurcating of central banking authorities. The ongoing conflict in Yemen provides the definitive empirical model of this phenomenon. Following the outbreak of the war, the Central Bank of Yemen (CBY) split geographically and institutionally between the internationally recognized government (IRG) in Aden and the de facto Houthi authorities in Sanaa25. This institutional schism triggered a devastating sequence of monetary warfare. The Aden-based CBY attempted to address liquidity shortages by printing new Yemeni rial banknotes. In retaliation, the Houthi authorities banned the circulation of the newly printed currency in their territories, declaring it counterfeit and a tool of inflation26. This ban effectively bifurcated the national currency, creating two separate exchange rates. The "old" rial in the north retained an artificially higher value due to extreme scarcity, while the "new" rial in the south rapidly depreciated26. For civilians attempting to send remittances across frontlines to support family members, the currency disparity imposed transfer fees that effectively erased up to fifty percent of the capital's value26. The conflict escalated further when the Houthi-controlled bank in Sanaa minted independent coins and issued un-serial-numbered banknotes, a unilateral sovereign action that cemented the economic fragmentation, isolated the northern banking sector from the global SWIFT system, and severely crippled the import of essential food supplies27. The systematic destruction of the financial sector ensures that even if kinetic military operations cease, the structural economic damage will perpetuate the humanitarian crisis indefinitely29.

6. The Urban Battlefield and Cascading Infrastructure Failure

The most devastating evolution of the Civil-War Trap is the urbanization of armed conflict. As populations globally migrate toward cities, belligerents increasingly fight for control of dense, highly networked urban terrain. Currently, an estimated fifty million people bear the brunt of urban warfare, subjected to the unique, compounded horrors of modern city combat6. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has extensively documented the catastrophic impact of urban warfare, emphasizing that modern cities operate as highly complex, interdependent systems5. An urban center relies on an integrated network of electricity, water, sanitation, communications, transport, food distribution, and healthcare systems. Consequently, the destruction of one node does not result in isolated damage; it triggers a cascading failure across the entire urban ecosystem, amplifying civilian suffering far beyond the immediate kinetic blast zone5.

6.1 The Nexus of Electricity, Water, and Sanitation

The ICRC's technical research details the exact mechanisms through which these cascading failures manifest. The absolute linchpin of modern urban survival is electricity. When combat operations—either intentionally or incidentally—damage power generation plants, high-voltage transmission lines, or local electrical transformers, the life-support systems of the city collapse simultaneously6. The immediate consequence of an electrical blackout is the cessation of the municipal water supply. Water treatment plants and pumping stations rely entirely on high-voltage electricity; when power fails, water pressure drops to zero. In a desperate bid to extract water, urban residents frequently connect private, fuel-powered booster pumps directly to the main water pipes. This action creates a powerful vacuum inside the municipal network, which forcefully sucks surrounding contaminated groundwater and raw sewage through microscopic cracks in the aging pipes. Consequently, the entire drinking water supply becomes heavily contaminated with biological pathogens6. Simultaneously, wastewater treatment facilities cease functioning without power. Raw sewage backs up into the streets and flows untreated into local rivers and aquifers, compounding the contamination of the environment and sparking outbreaks of cholera, dysentery, and hepatitis6.

6.2 The Collapse of Communications, Transport, and Food Systems

The loss of electricity immediately blinds the city's telecommunications architecture. Cell towers and internet service providers fail, severing civilians from critical early warning systems, cutting off contact with displaced family members, and preventing the dispatch of emergency medical services5. This communications blackout is frequently weaponized by armed groups to conduct operations without international scrutiny or to spread panic through targeted disinformation. Concurrently, urban transportation networks are paralyzed. Bridges, roadways, and rail lines are destroyed by heavy artillery, or rendered impassable by the presence of unexploded ordnance (UXO) and improvised explosive devices (IEDs)34. This collapse in transport directly severs the urban food supply chain. Agro-processing facilities, massive storage silos, and local markets dissolve as transport fails and refrigeration systems lose power34. As seen in recent conflicts in cities like Khartoum, the destruction of food storage facilities in the midst of conflict rapidly pushes populations toward catastrophe and famine34.

6.3 Healthcare Collapse and the "Vicious Cycle"

As disease outbreaks surge and food supplies dwindle, the civilian population converges on urban healthcare facilities. However, hospitals are subjected to the exact same infrastructural deprivations. Without electricity, ventilators, incubators, and dialysis machines fail; without clean water, surgical sterilization becomes impossible, and secondary infections proliferate rapidly among the war-wounded5. This infrastructural breakdown initiates what the ICRC terms the "vicious cycle" of protracted urban conflict. As essential services fail, consumers cease paying utility tariffs. Municipal water and power authorities run out of revenue, meaning salaries for technical staff are suspended6. Unable to feed their families and facing the constant threat of bombardment, highly trained engineers, sanitation technicians, and medical professionals flee the city. This resulting "brain drain" ensures that even if spare parts are smuggled through the front lines, the human capital required to repair, calibrate, and maintain the complex urban systems is permanently lost. System rehabilitation becomes mathematically impossible, cementing a generational collapse of public health5.

6.4 Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas (EWIPA) and IHL

The primary driver of this infrastructural devastation is the use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas (EWIPA)37. Heavy explosive weapons—such as unguided artillery, multi-barrel rocket launchers, and large aircraft bombs—were designed for open battlefields. When utilized in dense urban centers, their wide-area effects (blast overpressure and fragmentation) inherently lack the capacity for distinction between military objectives and civilian objects5. The use of EWIPA in urban warfare has sparked intense legal analysis regarding the interpretation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), specifically the principles of proportionality and precautions in attack40. Historically, militaries calculated collateral damage strictly based on the direct, immediate blast radius of the weapon36. However, the ICRC and legal scholars now forcefully argue that commanders must legally account for the "reverberating effects" (or indirect, tertiary effects) of an attack40. Reverberating effects are the delayed but foreseeable consequences of destroying critical infrastructure. If a commander authorizes a strike on a military target positioned within an electrical substation, the direct collateral damage might be minimal. However, the foreseeable reverberating effect is the loss of power to a nearby hospital and water pumping station, resulting in a severe public health crisis40. Because modern urban essential infrastructure is visible, and the catastrophic lessons of recent urban conflicts are public knowledge, the reverberating humanitarian effects of targeting urban infrastructure are objectively foreseeable and must be factored into the proportionality calculus40. Failure to do so constitutes a violation of IHL40. The international recognition of this crisis culminated in the 2022 Political Declaration on Strengthening the Protection of Civilians from the Humanitarian Consequences Arising from the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas, committing endorsing states to restrict the use of heavy explosive weapons in cities and systematically track civilian harm37.

7. Displacement Dynamics and Demographic Engineering

The cascading failure of urban infrastructure and the persistent threat of explosive weapons inevitably lead to mass civilian displacement. However, within the framework of the Civil-War Trap, displacement is not merely an unintended byproduct of hostilities; it is frequently utilized as a deliberate tactic of demographic engineering and territorial control5. As neighborhoods transform into front lines, the fundamental prerequisites for human survival—water, food, healthcare, and shelter—are eradicated5. Parties to the conflict may intentionally sever water pipelines or destroy electrical grids specifically to render a contested urban zone uninhabitable, thereby forcing the opposing constituency to flee and denying the adversary a supportive civilian base44. This forced migration triggers secondary humanitarian crises, as displaced urban populations overwhelm the infrastructure of neighboring cities and host communities, spreading the systemic strain across the region5. The displacement generated by urban warfare is uniquely protracted. Even after the guns have fallen silent, civilians remain in displacement camps for years, if not decades5. The sheer volume of destroyed housing stock, combined with the lack of functioning municipal services, renders immediate return impossible. The societal fabric is torn apart, and the resultant refugee flows frequently destabilize neighboring countries, illustrating how internal urban collapse rapidly metastasizes into a regional security threat.

8. The Reconstruction Trap: Urban Metabolism and Post-Conflict Resilience

When the kinetic phase of an urban civil war eventually subsides, cities find themselves trapped in a developmental abyss. The recovery of these spaces cannot be achieved through traditional, linear humanitarian aid models, which are designed for temporary relief rather than systemic rebuilding. Instead, urban planners and recovery experts approach post-conflict reconstruction through the theoretical framework of "Urban Metabolism"45.

8.1 The Disruption of the Circular Urban Metabolism

The Urban Metabolism (UM) framework conceptualizes a city as a living organism that requires continuous inputs (energy, clean water, construction materials, food) and produces outputs (solid waste, wastewater, emissions)45. Under optimal conditions, urban planners strive for a "Circular Urban Metabolism" (CUM), where waste is recycled back into inputs to promote sustainability and resilience45. Urban warfare brutally severs these metabolic pathways. The supply chains for critical inputs are blockaded, and the centralized mechanisms for processing outputs, such as wastewater treatment plants and municipal garbage collection fleets, are obliterated48. Consequently, the city drowns in its own toxic outputs while simultaneously starving for inputs. Rebuilding the urban metabolism is exceptionally complex because infrastructure must be reconstructed holistically. It is functionally futile to rebuild a water treatment facility if the electrical grid remains incapacitated and the technical workforce remains displaced in refugee camps.

8.2 The Urban Recovery Framework and Weapon Contamination

Recognizing that the scale of destruction in cities like Khartoum, Aleppo, and Sanaa requires a massive paradigm shift, organizations such as UN-Habitat advocate for an area-based, multi-sectoral approach through the Urban Recovery Framework (URF)34. The URF attempts to bypass the paralyzing debate of "relief versus development" by integrating long-term infrastructure repair directly into immediate crisis response, aiming to renew the social contract and build resilience across the humanitarian-development-peace nexus49. However, the physical reconstruction of the urban metabolism is perpetually stalled by the legacy of weapon contamination. Urban battlefields are saturated with unexploded ordnance (UXO), improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and explosive remnants of war (ERW) buried beneath thousands of tons of concrete rubble5. In densely packed urban environments, traditional mine-clearing techniques are wholly inadequate. The presence of booby-traps in civilian homes, schools, and hospitals makes rubble removal incredibly lethal and exorbitantly expensive36. This weapon contamination acts as an invisible, deadly barrier, permanently preventing the safe return of displaced populations and paralyzing large-scale reconstruction efforts36. Without the safe return of the civilian workforce, the local economy cannot restart, municipal tax revenues cannot be generated, and the city remains entirely dependent on international humanitarian financing, which is continually subject to donor fatigue and geopolitical volatility.

9. Conclusion

The Civil-War Trap is a multi-dimensional crisis wherein the initial fragmentation of political sovereignty acts as a catalyst for systemic, irreversible collapse. As state authority fractures, rival factions construct parallel "rebelocracies," institutionalizing taxation and information warfare structures that permanently undermine the legitimacy of the central state. The corresponding splintering of the security sector introduces highly trained combatants into the rebel ecosystem, while the proliferation of veto players and foreign proxies ensures that diplomatic negotiations remain structurally paralyzed. Economically, the weaponization of central banks and the inherent vulnerabilities of rentier states obliterate the macroeconomic mechanisms required for survival, plunging civilian populations into hyperinflation and isolating them from global markets. Concurrently, the migration of combat into urban centers results in the systematic annihilation of interconnected infrastructure. The indiscriminate use of explosive weapons triggers a cascading failure of electricity, water, sanitation, communications, transport, food, and healthcare systems—a reverberating disaster that violates the core tenets of International Humanitarian Law and permanently degrades the urban metabolism, forcing millions into protracted displacement. Ultimately, the Civil-War Trap demonstrates that modern internal conflict does not end when the shooting stops. The destruction of physical infrastructure, the contamination of the urban environment by explosive remnants, and the institutionalization of shadow economies create a highly resilient cycle of state failure. Breaking this trap requires an integrated paradigm that treats security stabilization, economic reunification, and urban infrastructural resilience as inseparable components of conflict resolution. Without addressing the deep, structural reverberations of dual sovereignty and urban collapse, post-conflict environments will remain trapped in a state of suspended devastation.

Works cited

1. Civil Wars as Challenges to the Modern International System, https\://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/146/4/112/27174/Civil-Wars-as-Challenges-to-the-Modern

2. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990, https\://pages.ucsd.edu/\~bslantchev/courses/ps240/06%20Domestic%20Organizations%20and%20International%20Behavior/Tilly%20-%20Coercion,%20capital%20and%20European%20states%20%5BCh%201,3,6%5D.pdf

3. 2 \- Rebel Governance – Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, https\://www\.cambridge.org/core/books/rebel-governance-in-civil-war/rebel-governance-constructing-a-field-of-inquiry-definitions-scope-patterns-order-causes/79377BBCB3E7A314EA9FFCDEE3902203

4. Rebel Governance – Constructing a Field of Inquiry: Definitions, https\://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/79377BBCB3E7A314EA9FFCDEE3902203/9781316182468c2\_p21-46\_CBO.pdf/rebel\_governance\_constructing\_a\_field\_of\_inquiry\_definitions\_scope\_patterns\_order\_causes.pdf

5. Urban warfare and violence | ICRC, https\://www\.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/urban-warfare-and-violence

6. URBAN SERVICES DURING PROTRACTED ARMED CONFLICT, https\://www\.icrc.org/sites/default/files/topic/file\_plus\_list/4249\_urban\_services\_during\_protracted\_armed\_conflict.pdf

7. Rebel Governance and the Politics of Civil War, https\://www\.files.ethz.ch/isn/191183/WP\_1\_2015.pdf

8. War as a Constitutive Moment \- Princeton University, https\://www\.princeton.edu/\~starr/articles/articles08/Starr\_Dodging\_a\_Bullet\_10-19-08.pdf

9. Understanding the Impact of Rebel Legitimation on Civilian Complian, https\://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/252794462/Rebel\_Governance\_and\_Legitimacy\_Understanding\_the\_Impact\_of\_Rebel\_Legitimation\_on\_Civilian\_Compliance\_with\_the\_LTTE\_Rule.pdf

10. Civilian Resistance to Rebel Governance, https\://hicn.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HiCN-WP-170.pdf

11. Full article: Rebel Governance: an analysis of the Taliban's, https\://www\.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09592318.2023.2282817

12. Statebreakers to Statemakers: Strategies of Rebel Governance, https\://slantchev.ucsd.edu/wp/pdf/RebelGovern-W079.pdf

13. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War, https\://books.google.com/books/about/Rebel\_Rulers.html?id=f8gx5tu4OsAC

14. The Legacy of Rebel Taxation on Post-Conflict Fiscal Capacity \- CSEF, https\://www\.csef.it/WP/wp787.pdf

15. A Closer Look at the Factors Influencing Military Defections during, https\://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012\&context=honors\_theses

16. Civil Resistance and Military Dynamics: Examining Security Force, https\://www\.nonviolent-conflict.org/civil-resistance-and-military-dynamics-examining-security-force-defections-in-the-arab-spring/

17. Integrating the Civil–Military Relations Subfield \- Annual Reviews, https\://www\.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060518-025407

18. Does Security Force Fragmentation Make Defections More or Less, https\://warpreventioninitiative.org/peace-science-digest/does-security-force-fragmentation-make-defections-more-or-less-likely/

19. Armed group formation in civil war: 'Movement', 'insurgent', and 'state, https\://www\.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/armed-group-formation-in-civil-war-movement-insurgent-and-state-splinter-origins/6B02E2A9136981C379C9F0989602B0BA

20. Veto Players and Civil War Duration \- IDEAS/RePEc, https\://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v50y2006i4p875-892.html

21. Veto Players and Peace Processes in Civil War, https\://insight.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028\&context=jlia

22. Rentier state \- Wikipedia, https\://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rentier\_state

23. From Rentier State to Failed State : War and the De-Formation of the, https\://shs.cairn.info/revue-a-contrario-2008-1-page-102?lang=fr

24. Rentier States and Conflict: New Concepts, Different Perspectives, https\://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1157529/m2/1/high\_res\_d/OZSUT-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf

25. Economic Fragmentation and External Shocks Hamper Yemen's, https\://www\.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/06/02/economic-fragmentation-and-external-shocks-hamper-yemen-s-recovery-path

26. Central Bank split piles on Yemenis' problems | The Jerusalem Post, https\://www\.jpost.com/middle-east/central-bank-split-piles-on-yemenis-problems-650429

27. Houthis' New Currency Sparks Fears of Renewed Economic, https\://south24.net/news/newse.php?nid=4813

28. Unification of Monetary Policy and the Banking Sector in Yemen, https\://mecouncil.org/blog\_posts/unification-of-monetary-policy-and-the-banking-sector-in-yemen/

29. The Cash Liquidity Crisis in Yemen: How monetary fragmentation, https\://coreinsightsconsults.com/the-cash-liquidity-crisis-in-yemen-how-monetary-fragmentation-sovereign-resource-depletion-and-institutional-collapse-have-strangled-yemens-financial-system-and-what-can-be-done-about-i/

30. 1 The Banking Industry...More Fragmentation and Isolation, https\://yemenief.org/Download\_Center/docment/doc\_3111.pdf

31. The Systematic Destruction of Yemen's Banking Sector \- WCYS, https\://wcys.org/the-systematic-destruction-of-yemens-banking-sector/

32. A PRIMER ON CIVILIAN HARM MITIGATION IN URBAN, https\://civiliansinconflict.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CIVIC\_Primer\_Civilian\_Harm\_Mitigation\_in\_Urban\_Operations.pdf

33. Water and war: The effect of functioning chlorinated water stations in, https\://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10752515/

34. Sudan situational update: Khartoum state \- ACAPS, https\://www\.acaps.org/fileadmin/Data\_Product/Main\_media/20240814\_ACAPS\_Sudan\_-\_Situational\_update\_Khartoum\_state.pdf

35. Post-war challenges in Khartoum: Infrastructure, utilities, demolition, https\://www\.emerald.com/ijdrbe/article/17/3/406/1361096/Post-war-challenges-in-Khartoum-Infrastructure

36. When War Moves to Cities: Protection of Civilians in Urban Areas, https\://www\.interaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/When-War-Moves-to-Cities-Report\_May-2017.pdf

37. Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas — UNODA, https\://ewipa.org/

38. Explosive weapons in populated areas \- OCHA, https\://www\.unocha.org/explosive-weapons-populated-areas

39. FAQs: Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas \- ICRC, https\://www\.icrc.org/en/article/faq-explosive-weapons-populated-areas

40. Proportionality and precautions in attack: The reverberating effects, https\://www\.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/proportionality-and-precautions-in-attack-the-reverberating-effects-of-using-explosive-weapons-in-populated-areas/444D7CE15C0C8B92CCDF67CA1F62D953

41. Reverberating Effects and International Law \- Civic, https\://www\.civiliansinconflict.org/knowledge/reverberating-effects-and-international-law/

42. The Political Declaration — UNODA \- ewipa, https\://ewipa.org/the-political-declaration

43. Implementation Framework \- INEW, https\://www\.inew.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Implementation-Framework.pdf

44. Having access to water is increasingly a matter of survival in conflict, https\://www\.icrc.org/en/document/having-access-water-increasingly-matter-survival-conflict-zones

45. (PDF) Circular Urban Metabolism Framework \- ResearchGate, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/339421054\_Circular\_Urban\_Metabolism\_Framework

46. Integration of Circular Economy and Urban Metabolism for a ... \- MDPI, https\://www\.mdpi.com/2413-8851/8/4/175

47. Urban Metabolism as Framework for Circular Economy Design for, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/299563263\_Urban\_Metabolism\_as\_Framework\_for\_Circular\_Economy\_Design\_for\_Cities

48. Mainstreaming Urban Metabolism: Advances and Challenges in City, https\://www\.researchgate.net/publication/258240161\_Mainstreaming\_Urban\_Metabolism\_Advances\_and\_Challenges\_in\_City\_Participation

49. URBAN RECOVERY FRAMEWORK \- UN-Habitat, https\://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/04/un-habitat\_urf\_advocacy\_note\_march\_2022\_1.pdf

50. Urban recovery framework \- UN-Habitat, https\://unhabitat.org/urban-recovery-framework

51. War in Cities, https\://rcrcconference.org/app/uploads/2022/05/06\_CoD22-War-in-Cities-Background-document-FINAL-EN.pdf