Case Study / Public Source Available Reference Implementation / Enterprise Validated

Multi-Agent Memory Coordination System

A deployable private-intranet, source-available reference implementation for coordinating external AI agents through registered identities and scoped grants, persistent reviewed memory, meeting and current-message routing, acknowledgements, and hash/CAS/lease controls for simultaneous local .uai edits.

Portfolio label: Enterprise Validated Evidence category: machine-intelligence-agent-coordination

Problem / constraint

What needed structure

External AI agents working on the same initiative can lose durable context, duplicate work, overwrite local continuity files, or act outside their intended scope when identity, routing, memory, and edit coordination remain implicit.

Legacy risk

What could regress

The service must coordinate external agents and shared memory on a private intranet without becoming the agent runtime, silently promoting unreviewed messages, or granting authority beyond explicit scopes.

Validation method

How the claim is checked

Review the public source and companion documentation, run the repository validation suite, and trace identity, scope, memory, message, acknowledgement, hash/CAS, claim, lease, and persistence contracts while checking every explicit non-claim.

Architecture strategy

How the proof is structured.

Architecture evidence is presented with private implementation details abstracted and explicit not-claimed boundaries.

Make agent identity and scope explicit before accepting shared coordination or memory operations. Separate transient current messages from durable memory that has passed a public-safe review boundary. Route meetings, goals, tasks, targeted messages, broadcasts, and acknowledgements through reviewable contracts. Use hashes, compare-and-swap preconditions, bounded edit claims, and 60-1800 second leases to coordinate simultaneous local .uai edits without claiming automatic merge or distributed consensus. Keep the coordination service independent from model hosting or execution and require human verification where authority matters.

Implementation evidence

  • The public repository implements agent registration, immutable scope grants, persistent scoped memory, meeting-room coordination, current-message routing, and per-recipient acknowledgements.
  • The local AI handoff coordination contract exposes hash-only heads, compare-and-swap checks, bounded edit claims, and 60-1800 second leases.
  • Persistence implementations cover file storage, SQLite, MySQL, and MariaDB while documentation keeps human verification and public-safe memory review explicit.
  • Repository review confirms the service coordinates external agents and does not host or execute their models.

Result / current status

A deployable, reviewable coordination and persistent-memory implementation is publicly inspectable; no hosted-service or production-scale result is asserted.

Technologies

.NET 9 C# HTTP APIs JSON SQLite MySQL MariaDB Hash and CAS Coordination Bounded Leases UAI Memory

Technical value

  • Multi-agent coordination architecture for external agents
  • Persistent AI memory separated from transient current-message delivery
  • Registered identity and immutable scope-grant design
  • Meeting, task, targeted-message, broadcast, and acknowledgement routing
  • Conflict-aware simultaneous local AI handoff edit coordination through hashes, compare-and-swap checks, bounded claims, and leases
  • Enterprise .NET implementation discipline with pluggable persistence and human verification boundaries

Not claimed / boundary

  • Source-available does not mean OSI-approved open source.
  • No hosted SaaS or production-scale operating history is claimed.
  • The service coordinates external agents; it does not host or execute models.
  • Hash/CAS checks and leases are not distributed consensus, CRDT semantics, exactly-once delivery, or operating-system file locks.
  • Simultaneous local AI handoff changes are not auto-merged, and current messages are not automatically promoted into persistent reviewed memory.

Continue the review

Compare this decision with the full evidence library.

Return to the collection, inspect the cross-site evidence map, or contact Mike to discuss the architecture in the context of an open role.